<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T19:06:15Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:drum.lib.umd.edu:1903/35430" metadataPrefix="dim">https://api.drum.lib.umd.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:drum.lib.umd.edu:1903/35430</identifier><datestamp>2026-07-01T07:48:33Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1903_2263</setSpec><setSpec>com_1903_1654</setSpec><setSpec>com_1903_2</setSpec><setSpec>col_1903_33173</setSpec><setSpec>col_1903_3</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Groth, Katrina</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Joyner, Janell</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="publisher" lang="en_US">Digital Repository at the University of Maryland</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="publisher" lang="en_US">University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Reliability Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2026-07-01T05:36:40Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2025</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier">https://doi.org/10.13016/kayg-6nay</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1903/35430</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">As part of system testing and verification (STV) for devices, designers must empiricallydemonstrate that their products can be used safely before they reach the market. Regulatory
agencies such as the FDA require evaluation of human performance, both psychomotor and
cognitive activities in the use of medical devices. Traditional human factors evaluations
emphasize psychomotor activities, limiting the ability to identify cognitive root causes of use
error. Existing Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) methods offer structured approaches for
modeling cognition, but these methods were designed for experts with a background in cognitive
sciences. These methods also lack standardized syntax for describing the tasks, a discrete list of
tasks to use, and were not designed for integration with product documentation. These
limitations will be addressed by developing and validating a structured, designer-accessible CTA
method that embeds cognitive and perceptual tasks within psychomotor task flows.
A five-phase methodology was used to construct and validate this method. Phase 1
involved selecting, refining, and embedding conceptual models of cognitive and psychomotor
task lists. Phase 2 involved combining the unified model with an information processing model,
establishing information sequencing rules. Phase 3 called for analyzing Instructions for Use
(IFUs) to derive Task Categories, creating a bridge between human–machine interactions (HMI)
and the unified model. Phase 4 involved the development of rule-based cognitive sentence syntax
and CTA templates to standardize task decomposition. Phase 5 empirically validated the latent
constructs of the unified model through a study with 145 subjects using exploratory structural
modeling (ESEM) to ensure the model was designer accessible and that it aligned with its
theoretical underpinnings.
ESEM factor loadings demonstrated theoretical coherence, supporting the validity of the
standardized structure. The outcome of this research is an empirically validated method for use
in CTA creation that reduces bias in task decomposition, improves repeatability, and combines
cognition with product design in a form accessible to designers. The method strengthens risk
analysis and STV by providing design teams with a standardized way to represent cognition
alongside psychomotor tasks, improving the traceability of use error pathways and supporting
safer, more reliable products.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">en</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">COGNITIVE MODELING FOR HUMAN FACTORS TESTING: DEVELOPING A STRUCTURED TASK ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK FOR DESIGNERS</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Dissertation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pqcontrolled" lang="en_US">Cognitive psychology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Cognitive Taxonomy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Human-Machine Interaction</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Information Processing Models</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Psychomotor Taxonomy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Risk Mitigation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="pquncontrolled" lang="en_US">Usability Testing</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">embargo</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>