ABSTRACT 
 
 
 
Title of Thesis:​ ​ ​ ​ VACANT TO VIBRANT – Revitalizing Urban Spaces through  

Adaptive Reuse 
 

Christophe Tanis, Master of Architecture, 2025 
 

 
Thesis Directed By:​ ​ ​ Clinical Professor Matthew Bell, School of Architecture,  

Planning, and Preservation 
 
 

How can adaptive reuse design strategies be applied to support urban renewal and better 

placemaking? Urban areas globally face continuous evolution driven by population, economic, and 

environmental shifts. This evolution often leads to development projects that prioritize demolition over 

preservation, resulting in the loss of cultural landmarks, increased waste, and urban sprawl. Adaptive 

reuse presents a sustainable alternative, challenging the misconception that it merely involves preserving 

structures in static forms. Instead, adaptive reuse reimagines existing buildings, transforming them into 

vibrant, multifunctional spaces that meet modern programmatic demands while preserving cultural and 

environmental assets. 

This thesis explores how adaptive reuse strategies can serve as tools for urban renewal and 

placemaking, addressing challenges like demolition bias and the underutilization of existing structures. 

By integrating innovative architectural interventions as a kit of parts, adaptive reuse enables the creation 

of spaces that foster community engagement, stimulate local economies, and enhance sustainability. A 

proposed “kit of parts” framework offers adaptable design strategies, such as vertical additions, facade 

rejuvenation, and interior reconfigurations, that empower stakeholders to implement adaptive reuse 

dynamically and effectively. 

By positioning adaptive reuse as a catalyst for urban regeneration, this research highlights its 

potential to drive economic growth, reduce environmental impact, and strengthen social and cultural 

cohesion, ultimately reframing it as a cornerstone of sustainable urban development. 

 



 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 

 
 
 

VACANT TO VIBRANT – Revitalizing Urban Spaces through Adaptive Reuse 
 
 

by 
 
 

Christophe Tanis 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the 
University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment 

of the requirements for the degree of 
Master of Architecture 

2025 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Advisory Committee: 
Clinical Professor Matthew Bell, Chair 
Professor Brian Kelly 
Professor Ken Filler 

 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

© Copyright by 
Christophe Tanis 

2025 
 

 



Preface 
 
This project examines how transforming abandoned and underused buildings can breathe new life into 

struggling urban areas. By prioritizing adaptive reuse over demolition, it advocates for sustainable growth 

that honors the existing character of the built environment. The work highlights design strategies and 

real-world examples that showcase the potential of renewal through thoughtful intervention. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

ii 
 



Dedication 
 
I dedicate this work to my mom and my family, whose unwavering support, love, and encouragement 

have carried me through every challenge and milestone. Your belief in me gave me the strength to keep 

going, even when things felt impossible. Thank you for always being my foundation, my inspiration, and 

my greatest source of comfort and motivation. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

iii 
 



Acknowledgements  
 

I would like to express my deepest gratitude to Professor Matthew Bell for his invaluable insights, 

thoughtful critiques, and for consistently pushing me to broaden my perspective throughout the semester. 

His deep knowledge, generous guidance, and steady support made this thesis process both enriching and 

inspiring. I am also incredibly thankful to my classmates, whose camaraderie, positive energy, and honest 

advice created a motivating environment that kept me going. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

iv 
 



Table of Contents 
 

Preface ……………………………………………………………………………………………………..ii 
Dedication ………………………………………………………………………………………………...iii 
Acknowledgments ..………………………………………………………………………………………vi 
Table of Contents………………………………………………………………….…..………………..….v 
List of Figures ……………………………………………………….………………………………...…vii 
List of Illustrations ……………………………………………………...………………………………viii 
Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………..1 

Problem Area………………………………………………………………………………………2 
​ Built Environment Response………………………………………………………………………2 

Research Approach………………………………………………………………………...………3 
Chapter 2: Literature Review ……………………………………………………………………………4 
​ Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………...……4 
​ Adaptive Reuse……………………………………………………………………………….……5 
​ ​ Historical Context and Preservation ………………………………………...……………5 
​ ​ Adaptive Reuse as a Strategic Tool for Urban Renewal …………………….……………6 
​ Urban Identity and Placemaking ………………………………………………………………..…6 
​ ​ Integration with Urban Goals …………………………………………..…………………7 
​ Economic Advantages………………………………………………………………………...……8 
​ ​ Economic Impact of Placemaking.…………………………………..……………………8 
​ ​ An Asset for Large-Scale Projects………………………………………...………………9 
​ Social and Cultural Impact …………………………………………………...……………………9 
​ ​ Strengthening Community Engagement …………………………………...……………10 
​ Challenges and Opportunities……………………………………………………………….……10 
​ ​ Financial Considerations …………………………………………………...……………11 
Chapter 3: Strategies – The Kit of Parts ……………………………………………………….…...… 12 
​ Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………12 
​ Shift ………………………………………………………………………………………………13 
​ Vertical Addition …………………………………………………………………………………13 
​ Gutted …………………………………………………………………………………….………14 
​ Reskin ……………………………………………………………………………….……………14 
​ Attachment ………………………………………………………………….……………………15 
​ Wrap ……………………………………………………………………………………...………15 
Chapter 4: Methodologies.……………………………………………………………...…………….…17 
​ Field Studies and Site Observations ………………………………………………..…………… 17 
​ Archival Research ………………………………………………………………………….… …17 

Community Engagement through Interviews and Surveys ………………………………………18 
Economic Analysis.………………………………………………………………………………18 
Zoning, Policy, and Land Use Research …………………………………………………………18 
Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………..…………19 

Chapter 5: Precedent Studies ………………………………………………………………..…………20 
​ Case Study: Louvre Modernization ……………………………………………………..……… 20 

Case Study: Library Escuelas Pías ……………………………………………….………………22 
Case Study: Coal Drops Yard ……………………………………………………….……………25 
Case Study: Port House ………………………………………………………………………..…28 
Case Study: Zeitz MOCAA.…………………………………………………………...…………30 

Chapter 6: Zones and Programming of Space…………………………………………………………33 
​ The Programmatic Goals for the Adaptive Reuse Project ……………………………………….34 

Coal Drops Yard: A Precedent for Adaptive Reuse in Urban Renewal ……………………….…35 
 

v 
 



Chapter 7: Site Selection …………………………………………………………………….……….…38​ 
Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………38 

​ Site Criteria ………………………………………………………………………………………38 
​ Site Selection ……………………………………………………………………………….……39 
​ ​ Site A: The American Ice Company …………………………………………….………39 
​ ​ Site B: Hendler Creamery …………………………………………………….…………43 
​ ​ Site C: Uptown Theatre ………………………………………………………...……….47 
​ Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………………….51 
Chapter 8: Exploring Strategies………………...………………………………………………………52 
​ Exploration 1: Duo …………………………………………………………………………….. 53 
​ Exploration 2: Parasite ……………………………………………………………………….…53 
​ Exploration 3: Continuation ………………………………………………………………….…54 

Chapter 9: Design Evolution………………………………………….…………………………………55 
Chapter 10: Conclusion …..………………………………………………………………….………….62 
​ Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………62 
​ Findings ………………………………………………………………………………………..…62 
​ Development ……………………………………………………………………………………..62 
Appendices …………………………………………………………………………………..…………...64 
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………….…………..66 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

vi 

 



List of Figures 
 
Figure 1 - Plan Diagrams of Louvre Modernization……………………………………….……………...22 
Figure 2 - Section Diagram of Louvre Modernization……………………………………….…………....22 
Figure 3 - Exterior of Library Escuelas Pias……………………………………………….……………...23 
Figure 4 - Interior of Library Escuelas Pias………………………………………………….……………23 
Figure 5 - Coal Drops Yard Exterior Photo………………………………………………….…………….25 
Figure 6 - Coal Drop Yards Touching Curves……………………………………………….…………….26 
Figure 7 - Prerenovated Section…………………………………………………………….……………..26 
Figure 8 - Exterior Photo of Port House…………………………………………………………………..28 
Figure 9 -  Section Port House Diagram…………………………………………………………………..29 
Figure 10 - Exterior Photo of Zeitz MOCCA……………………………………………………………..30 
Figure 11 - Heatherick Studio Rendering…………………………………………………………………30 
Figure 12 - Zeitz MOCAA Floor Plans……………………………………………………………………31 
Figure 13 - Coal Drops Yard Aerial Photo………………………………………………………………...35 
Figure 14 - Aerial Map…………………………………………………………………………………….40 
Figure 15 - Street Views…………………………………………………………………………………...41 
Figure 16 - Baltimore City American Ice Company Plat Map……………………………………………42 
Figure 17 - Hendler Creamery Area Map…………………………………………………………………43 
Figure 18 - Hendler Creamery Streets Views……………………………………………………………..44 
Figure 19 - Hendler Creamery Plans………………………………………………………………………46 
Figure 20 - Uptown Theatre Site Area…………………………………………………………………….47 
Figure 21 - Uptown Theatre Street Views…………………………………………………………………48 
Figure 22 - Uptown Theatre Plan………………………………………………………………………….50 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

vii 
 



 
 
 
 

List of Illustrations 
 
Illustration 1 - Potential Adaptive Reuse Strategies. Drawings by Author ...……………………………..12 
Illustration 2 - Shift Design Strategy. Drawings by Author ...………………………………………….....13 
Illustration 3 - Vertical Addition Design Strategy. Drawings by Author……………………………….…13 
Illustration 4 - Gutted Design Strategy. Drawings by Author………………………………………..……14 
Illustration 5 - Reskin Design Strategy. Drawings by Author…………………………………………….14 
Illustration 6 - Attachment Design Strategy. Drawings by Author………………………………………..15 
Illustration 7  - Wrap Design Strategy. Drawings by Author……………………………………………...15 
Illustration 8 - Louvre Figure Ground. Drawing by Author………………………………………………21 
Illustration 9 - Plan Diagrams. Diagrams by Author………………………………………………….…..24 
Illustration 10 - Section Diagram. Diagram by Author………………………………………………...….26 
Illustration 11- Diagrams. Diagrams by Author…………………………………………………………...27 
Illustration 12 - Diagrams. Diagrams by Author………………………………………………………….29 
Illustration 13 - Diagrams. Diagrams by Author……………………………………………………….…32 
Illustration 14 - Program Goals Diagram. Diagram by Author…………………………………………...33 
Illustration 15 - Reverse Engineering Diagram by Author……………………………………………..…36 
Illustration 16 - Reverse Engineering. Diagram by Author………………………………………….……37 
Illustration 17  - Program zone scale comparison for the initial project. Diagram by Author…………….37 
Illustration 18 - Site Criteria ranking matrix of proposed analyzed sites. Drawing by Author………...…39 
Illustration 19 - Diagram. Drawing by Author…………………………………………………………….41 
Illustration 20 - Diagram. Drawing by Author…………………………………………………………….42 
Illustration 21 - Neighborhood Map. Drawing by Author………………………………………………...45 
Illustration 22 - Neighborhood Map. Drawing by Author……………………………………………...…45 
Illustration 23 - Neighborhood Diagram. Drawing by Author…………………………………………....48 
Illustration 24 - Accessibility Diagram. Drawing by Author…………………………………………...…49 
Illustration 25 - Kit of Parts design strategies concepts individually applied. Drawing by Author.………52 
Illustration 26 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author…………………………..…53 
Illustration 27 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author……………………….…….54 
Illustration 28 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author………………………..……54 
Illustration 29 - Aerial final aerial design isometric. Drawing by Author …..……………………………55 
Illustration 30 - Program diagram isometric. Drawing by Author ………………………………………..56 
Illustration 31 - Hendler Hall interior main hall rendering. Drawing by Author …………………………57 
Illustration 32 - E Baltimore St Elevation. Drawing by Author ………………………………………….57 
Illustration 33 - Hendler Hall site section. Drawing by Author …………………………………………..58 
Illustration 34 - Site Ground Floor Plan. Drawing by Author ……………………………………………58 
Illustration 35 - Upper Floor Plan. Drawing by Author …………………………………………………..59 
Illustration 36 - Upper Mezzanine Floor Plan. Drawing by Author ……………………………………...59 
Illustration 37 - Hendler Hall and green space exterior perspective. Drawing by Author………………...60 
Illustration 38 - Hendler Creamery extended lot timeline. Drawing by Author ...………………………..61 
Illustration 39 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author ………………………………………..64 
Illustration 40 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author ………………………………………..64 
Illustration 41 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author ………………………………………..65 
Illustration 42 - Conceptual Ground Floor Plan Study. Drawing by Author ……………………………..65 
 
 
 

viii 
 



Chapter 1: Introduction  

How can adaptive reuse design strategies be applied to support urban renewal and better placemaking? 

By reframing adaptive reuse as a dynamic and innovative process with architectural interventions, this 

research aims to demonstrate how it can fulfill the functional, aesthetic, and economic goals of 

development while preserving the cultural and environmental assets of urban areas. 

Urban areas around the world are constantly evolving, responding to shifts in population, 

economics, and environmental challenges. This evolution often calls for development projects 

spearheaded by planners and developers. Unfortunately, a prevalent approach to urban renewal involves 

demolishing existing structures to make way for new buildings, disregarding the potential of existing 

architectural assets.1 This mindset not only leads to the loss of cultural and historical landmarks2 but also 

generates waste, contributes to urban sprawl3, and overlooks more sustainable and economically viable 

solutions.4 Adaptive reuse offers a compelling alternative to complete demolition, one that aligns with 

programmatic goals while achieving broader benefits for the built environment and the community.5 

Adaptive reuse is often misunderstood. It is commonly perceived as a mere conservation effort 

where buildings are preserved exactly as they are, with little to no functional or aesthetic transformation.6 

This misconception underestimates the versatility and potential of adaptive reuse as a proactive design 

strategy.7 Adaptive reuse is not simply about maintaining a building in its original state; it involves 

creatively reimagining existing structures to meet today’s needs, whether for residential, commercial, or 

7 Alessandro Rigolon, "What Predicts the Demand and Sale of Vacant Public Properties? Urban Greening 
and Gentrification in Chicago," Urban Studies 56, no. 4 (2019): 813–30. 

6 Nicholas A. Phelps, Sequel to Suburbia: Glimpses of America's Post-Suburban Future (Cambridge: MIT 
Press, 2015). 

5 Olivia Anne Sinclair, "Vacant to Vibrant: Transforming Vacant Lots in North Philadelphia," Landscape 
Architecture Journal 42, no. 3 (2020): 120–31. 

4 Dorothee Brantz and Avi Sharma, eds., Urban Resilience in a Global Context (Berlin: Springer, 2020). 

3 John M. Findlay, Magic Lands: Western Cityscapes and American Culture After 1940 (Berkeley: 
University of California Press, 1992). 

2 Steven Gregory, Black Corona: Race and the Politics of Place in an Urban Community (Princeton: 
Princeton University Press, 1998). 

1 Thomas Schropfer, Dense + Green: Innovative Building Types for Sustainable Urban Architecture 
(Basel: Birkhäuser, 2016). 

1 



public use.8 This approach can enable planners and developers to fulfill programmatic requirements while 

retaining the character and significance of a site.9 

 

Problem Area 

The challenge lies in the persistent tendency of planners and developers to default to demolition for 

projects. This approach is driven by a belief that new construction provides greater flexibility to meet 

program needs and economic goals. Yet, demolition often comes at a cost: the erasure of history, the 

displacement of communities, and the environmental burden of construction waste. Additionally, this 

method misses the opportunity to capitalize on the intrinsic value of existing structures, such as their 

cultural significance, embodied energy, and potential to serve as focal points for revitalized 

neighborhoods. 

Furthermore, the prevailing perception of adaptive reuse as a static process contributes to its 

underutilization. Many developers assume that reusing a building means leaving it entirely untouched, 

which they see as incompatible with modern functional demands.  

 

Built Environment Response 

The proposed solution involves reconceptualizing adaptive reuse as a tool for placemaking. Transforming 

structures into vibrant, multifunctional spaces that enrich their communities. Adaptive reuse projects have 

the unique ability to breathe new life into buildings, extending their utility and reinforcing their 

significance as cultural and social landmarks. By focusing on placemaking, these projects create spaces 

that attract people, foster community engagement, and contribute to the social and economic vitality of 

their surroundings. 

When adaptive reuse is approached as a placemaking strategy, its benefits can extend far beyond 

preservation. It becomes a driver for urban regeneration, catalyzing economic growth and stimulating 

9 Bie Plevoets and Koenraad Van Cleempoel, Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases 
of an Emerging Discipline (London: Routledge, 2019). 

8 Donna L. Maltzan, Project Delivery Strategies (Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2021). 

2 



local investment. Revitalized buildings can serve as hubs for commerce, culture, and social interaction, 

drawing people to previously overlooked areas and increasing property values. The ripple effects of such 

project can stimulate local economies, and enhance the overall quality of urban life. 

Moreover, adaptive reuse projects align with principles of sustainability by reducing waste and 

minimizing the environmental footprint of new construction. By utilizing the embodied energy of existing 

structures, these projects conserve resources and contribute to climate resilience. Additionally, adaptive 

reuse often involves integrating green spaces, modern building systems, and energy-efficient designs, 

further enhancing their sustainable value. 

The social and cultural impact of adaptive reuse cannot be overstated. By preserving the historical 

and architectural identity of a site, these projects foster a sense of place and continuity for communities. 

They provide an opportunity to celebrate local heritage while addressing contemporary needs, ensuring 

that development is inclusive and equitable. In this way, adaptive reuse becomes a tool for not only 

physical transformation but also social cohesion and cultural revitalization. 

 

Research Approach 

To support this argument, this thesis introduces a “kit of parts” framework of design strategies that 

developers and planners can adapt to meet the specific needs of their projects. These strategies range from 

vertical additions and facade rejuvenation to interior reconfigurations and more. By offering a structured 

yet flexible approach, the kit of parts empowers stakeholders to envision adaptive reuse as a viable and 

innovative alternative to complete demolition. 

 

By reimagining adaptive reuse as a dynamic and scalable strategy, this thesis aims to shift the 

perception of reuse from a niche practice to a central component of urban planning and development. 

Through its emphasis on placemaking, sustainability, and economic vitality, adaptive reuse offers a 

transformative response to the challenges of urban renewal 

3 



Chapter 2: Literature Review 

Introduction 

Adaptive reuse has emerged as a transformative approach in architecture and urban design, offering a 

method to creatively repurpose existing buildings while addressing today’s needs. This approach allows 

designers and developers to rethink the potential of underutilized structures, adapting them into vibrant 

spaces that contribute to the urban fabric. Unlike full-scale demolition and new construction, which often 

disregards the cultural and architectural significance of a site, adaptive reuse strikes a balance between 

honoring the past and embracing the future. 10 

The focus of this chapter is on adaptive reuse as a tool for placemaking and urban profitability. 

By integrating thoughtful design interventions, including partial demolition and strategic reconfiguration, 

adaptive reuse can transform obsolete structures into spaces that attract economic investment and 

community engagement. This approach positions adaptive reuse not as a compromise but as a superior 

strategy for urban renewal, aligning with the growing demand for dynamic, meaningful places in cities.11 

In this chapter, the role of adaptive reuse in placemaking is explored in depth. The discussion 

centers on its ability to enhance urban identity, support economic prosperity, and offer a compelling 

alternative to more traditional development strategies. By leveraging the untapped potential of existing 

structures, adaptive reuse can drive urban transformation while creating places that are both profitable and 

meaningful.12 

 

 

 

 

 

12 John M. Findlay, Magic Lands: Western Cityscapes and American Culture After 1940 (University of 
California Press, 1992). 

11  Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 
10  Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 

4 



Adaptive Reuse 

Adaptive reuse is the process of repurposing existing structures for new uses while maintaining their core 

architectural integrity. This approach diverges from traditional demolition and new construction by 

seeking to reimagine buildings with thoughtful design interventions that meet modern functional 

requirements. Unlike simple renovation, which restores or updates a building's existing use, adaptive 

reuse involves significant transformations that give structures a new purpose, often different from their 

original intent.13 

In the context of architecture and urban planning, adaptive reuse is an innovative response to the 

challenges of meeting contemporary demands within pre-existing urban fabrics. It allows designers, 

planners, and developers to creatively adapt a building’s spatial and structural elements while preserving 

its unique historical or cultural identity. Adaptive reuse aligns with urban redevelopment efforts, offering 

a flexible framework for revitalizing underutilized or outdated spaces.14 

This approach reflects an understanding of architecture as an evolving discipline, emphasizing its 

potential to respect the past while accommodating future needs. By retaining much of the original 

structure, adaptive reuse supports creative reinterpretations of space that balance historical significance 

with modern functionality, offering a compelling alternative to full demolition and new construction. 

 

Historical Context and Preservation 

The concept of adaptive reuse is not new; it has historical roots stretching back centuries. Societies have 

long sought to preserve and repurpose structures, often out of necessity or resource scarcity. Examples 

range from medieval castles being transformed into administrative centers to ancient Roman aqueducts 

converted into pedestrian pathways.15 These early efforts highlight humanity’s enduring ability to adapt 

architectural heritage to meet evolving needs. 

15 Bie Plevoets and Koenraad Van Cleempoel, Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases 
of an Emerging Discipline (London: Routledge, 2019). 

14 Dorothee Brantz and Avi Sharma, "Urban Resilience in a Global Context," Urban Studies Journal, 2016. 
13 Olivia Anne Sinclair, Vacant to Vibrant: Transforming Vacant Lots in North Philadelphia (2021), 45–48. 

5 



Adaptive Reuse as a Strategic Tool for Urban Renewal 

Adaptive reuse serves as a powerful strategy for urban renewal by addressing the complexities of 

revitalizing existing urban landscapes. As cities grow and evolve, they often face the challenge of 

balancing historical preservation with the need to accommodate changing societal, economic, and 

technological demands. Adaptive reuse bridges this gap by transforming outdated or neglected structures 

into vibrant, functional spaces that align with newer urban goals. 

One of the key strengths of adaptive reuse lies in its ability to reintegrate marginalized or 

overlooked buildings into the fabric of thriving urban centers. By repurposing these spaces, cities can 

combat issues such as blight, underutilization, and spatial inequity. 

Adaptive reuse also fosters a sense of continuity in urban areas, reinforcing the historical and 

cultural narratives that define a city’s identity. By preserving distinctive architectural features and 

integrating them into modern designs, these projects create spaces that are simultaneously rooted in the 

past and oriented toward the future. This approach helps cities maintain their unique character while 

remaining adaptable to changing needs.16 

Moreover, adaptive reuse aligns with broader urban renewal strategies by promoting densification 

and reducing urban sprawl. By capitalizing on existing infrastructure, these projects minimize the need for 

large-scale development on undeveloped land, preserving open spaces and fostering more sustainable 

urban growth. They also serve as a cost-effective alternative to new construction, particularly in densely 

populated areas where land availability is limited.17 

 

Urban Identity and Placemaking 

Adaptive reuse contributes significantly to creating a sense of place by preserving the architectural and 

cultural essence of a building and fostering deeper connections between the built environment and the 

community. It preserves and repurposes the historical and architectural essence of a building, anchoring it 

17 Bie Plevoets and Koenraad Van Cleempoel, Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases 
of an Emerging Discipline (London: Routledge, 2019). 

16 Donna L. Maltzan, Project Delivery Strategies (Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2021). 

6 



to the cultural and historical identity of its city. Unlike demolition and new construction, adaptive reuse 

maintains the unique character of a place by weaving its history into urban life. For example, in many 

European cities, old buildings are adapted for modern use rather than torn down. This approach 

strengthens the connection between the past and present, ensuring that the city's architectural language 

and historical context remain intact.18 By retaining these elements, adaptive reuse creates spaces that feel 

more authentic and meaningful, fostering a stronger sense of place and continuity for the community.19 

 

Integration with Urban Goals 

Adaptive reuse is not merely a tool for preserving historical structures; it also integrates seamlessly with 

modern urban planning objectives. One of the key advantages of adaptive reuse is its ability to 

complement urban densification strategies. By repurposing existing structures within established 

neighborhoods, cities can accommodate increased activity and demand without sprawling into 

undeveloped areas. This approach aligns with sustainable urban planning goals by concentrating growth 

in areas with existing infrastructure, such as transit systems, utilities, and public amenities. 

Additionally, adaptive reuse aligns with most citywide comprehensive plans that emphasize 

revitalizing neglected urban areas and fostering economic growth. These projects often act as catalysts for 

broader redevelopment initiatives, sparking investment and attracting new businesses, residents, and 

visitors. By breathing new life into existing structures, adaptive reuse enhances the appeal and 

competitiveness of cities, positioning them as desirable places to live, work, and invest. Another critical 

aspect of adaptive reuse is its adaptability to evolving urban goals, such as affordable housing, cultural 

preservation, and public space creation. By tailoring projects to meet specific community needs, adaptive 

reuse contributes to equitable urban development.20 

 

20 Dorothee Brantz and Avi Sharma, Urban Resilience in a Global Context (New York: Routledge, 2023). 

19 Natarajan, Lucy, and Michael Short. Engaged Urban Pedagogy: Participatory Practices in Planning and 
Place-Making. UCL Press, 2023. 

18 Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 

7 



Economic Advantages 

Adaptive reuse presents a compelling economic opportunity for developers, cities, and property owners. 

One significant avenue of profitability lies in the adaptive reuse of properties within high-demand urban 

areas. Repurposing older, vacant buildings into mixed-use developments, commercial hubs, or cultural 

landmarks can increase property values not just for the reused building but for the surrounding area. 

Neighborhoods with revitalized assets often experience broader economic uplift, with increased foot 

traffic, consumer spending, and overall desirability. For developers, this translates into higher occupancy 

rates and increased revenue generation, making adaptive reuse an economically attractive option.21 

 

Economic Impact of Placemaking 

Placemaking, when achieved through adaptive reuse, has a measurable impact on local economies. By 

transforming underutilized spaces into vibrant, multifunctional destinations, adaptive reuse projects create 

economic ripple effects that benefit businesses, residents, and cities. A repurposed structure that serves as 

a cultural venue, for example, not only generates revenue from its direct operations but also attracts 

visitors who spend on nearby dining, shopping, and lodging.22 

Adaptive reuse-driven placemaking creates unique and attractive environments that draw people 

to live, work, and visit. This influx of activity bolsters local businesses and generates additional tax 

revenue for municipalities. Moreover, the distinctiveness of an adaptively reused building can make it a 

landmark, increasing tourism and further enhancing economic benefits. By fostering a sense of place, 

these projects anchor economic activity in a way that traditional, generic developments often fail to 

achieve.23 

 

 

23 O’Sullivan, Arthur. Urban Economics. 8th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2012. 
22 Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 

21 Royce Hanson. Rethinking Urban Policy : Urban Development in an Advanced Economy. 1st ed. 
Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1983. 

8 



An Asset for Large-Scale Projects 

For large-scale urban developments, adaptive reuse can serve as a strategic and financially advantageous 

component. Incorporating reused structures into master plans offers developers the chance to achieve 

multiple goals: preserving cultural heritage, meeting sustainability targets, and creating unique spaces that 

set their projects apart. Incorporating adaptive reuse into large-scale urban projects also aligns with 

broader economic strategies. For example, using historic or iconic buildings as anchor points within a 

development can elevate the project’s overall value and appeal. These reused structures often become 

focal points, lending character and identity to the project while enhancing marketability. Developers can 

leverage this uniqueness to attract tenants, businesses, and consumers, ensuring the long-term economic 

success of the project.24 

 

Social and Cultural Impact 

Preserving cultural heritage is a cornerstone of adaptive reuse. Through the thoughtful transformation of 

historical structures, this approach ensures that the architectural and cultural identity of a city is not only 

retained but amplified. Buildings often carry the stories of the communities they inhabit; repurposing 

them enables these stories to continue.25 

Adaptive reuse projects often embrace the unique architectural elements of older structures, from 

their materials to their design features. By retaining these aspects, such projects foster a connection to the 

past that resonates with both current and future generations. Additionally, adaptive reuse celebrates the 

diversity of cultural heritage by incorporating the traditions and identities of the communities it serves. 

Projects can be designed to reflect the social and cultural narratives of a neighborhood, using architecture 

25 Natarajan, Lucy, and Michael Short. Engaged Urban Pedagogy: Participatory Practices in Planning and 
Place-Making. UCL Press, 2023. 

24 Ahmed, Iftekhar, and Masa Noguchi, eds. Resilience and Sustainability in Architecture and Urban 
Planning : Policies, Practices, Strategies and Visions. Place of publication not identified: MDPI - 
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2023. 

9 



as a medium to honor and preserve local identity. Such efforts contribute to a city’s cultural richness and 

make urban spaces more engaging and meaningful.26 

 

Strengthening Community Engagement  

Community engagement is both a driver and a benefit of adaptive reuse. Unlike new construction, which 

often feels imposed upon neighborhoods, adaptive reuse tends to prioritize the needs and desires of the 

local community. By working with residents and stakeholders during the planning and design phases, 

developers can ensure that the final project aligns with the community’s vision and aspirations. 

Adaptively reused spaces are uniquely positioned to foster social connections and interaction. The 

process of adaptive reuse often involves collaboration between architects, city planners, local 

organizations, and residents. This collaborative approach empowers communities by giving them a voice 

in the development process. Residents who see their input reflected in the final outcome are more likely to 

feel a sense of ownership and pride in the project, which enhances its long-term success and relevance.27 

 

Challenges and Opportunities 

One of the most significant challenges in adaptive reuse projects is navigating complex regulatory 

frameworks. Zoning laws, building codes, and preservation regulations often create hurdles that can delay 

or even prevent projects. For example, historical buildings may be protected by strict heritage 

conservation policies, limiting the extent of alterations allowed. While these regulations are essential for 

safeguarding cultural and architectural integrity, they can also constrain creative solutions and 

modernization efforts.28 

 

28 Hanson, Royce. Rethinking Urban Policy : Urban Development in an Advanced Economy. 1st ed. 
Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1983. 

27 Charles C. Bohl. Place Making : Developing Town Centers, Main Streets, and Urban Villages. 
Washington, D.C: Urban Land Institute, 2002. 

26 Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 

10 



In many cases, adaptive reuse projects must contend with outdated zoning classifications that do 

not align with modern mixed-use or community-oriented purposes. For instance, converting a former 

industrial building into a residential or commercial space might require variances or rezoning, which 

involves lengthy approval processes. Additionally, building codes designed for new construction may not 

be easily applicable to older structures, necessitating costly upgrades to meet modern safety standards. 

Despite these challenges, opportunities exist for cities to adopt more flexible policies that encourage 

adaptive reuse. For example, some municipalities offer tax incentives, grants, or streamlined permitting 

processes for projects that prioritize sustainability or historic preservation. These measures can mitigate 

financial and procedural burdens, making adaptive reuse more attractive to developers. By addressing 

regulatory barriers, cities can promote adaptive reuse as a viable and beneficial development strategy.29 

 

Financial Considerations 

Financing adaptive reuse projects can also be more complex than traditional development. Lenders may 

view these projects as higher risk due to uncertainties around renovation costs and regulatory compliance. 

This perception can lead to higher interest rates or stricter loan conditions, further increasing financial 

pressures. 

However, adaptive reuse also presents unique economic opportunities. By reusing materials and 

retaining existing structural elements, projects can achieve significant cost savings compared to new 

builds. Additionally, adaptive reuse often enhances the value of surrounding properties, attracting 

investment and fostering local economic growth. Developers who can effectively manage costs while 

delivering high-quality results stand to benefit from the increased profitability and long-term returns that 

adaptive reuse can offer.30 

 

30 Derek Latham. Creative Re-Use of Buildings. Shaftesbury, Dorset: Donhead, 2000. 

29 Hanson, Royce. Rethinking Urban Policy : Urban Development in an Advanced Economy. 1st ed. 
Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1983. 

11 



Chapter 3: Strategies - The Kit of Parts 

Introduction 

Adaptive reuse has traditionally been perceived as a method of revitalizing existing structures without 

significant alteration, but this view limits its potential. Instead, adaptive reuse can involve transformative 

interventions that redefine a building’s form, function, and identity while retaining its essence. To address 

the misconception that reuse equates to preservation alone, this chapter introduces a refined approach, 

referred to as the "Kit of Parts." These seven strategies highlight the versatility and design innovation 

inherent in adaptive reuse, each providing a unique way to engage with existing structures. 

The development of these seven strategies draws inspiration from architectural precedents and 

existing building forms.31 Influenced by (White 1999) architectural interventions, the strategies reflect 

recurring patterns applied to repurpose spaces. By studying how architects have transformed and 

reimagined structures over time, these approaches have been synthesized into a cohesive framework that 

addresses adaptive reuse comprehensively. This synthesis ensures that the strategies are both rooted in 

practical application and versatile enough to accommodate diverse architectural challenges.32 

 

Illustration 1 - Potential Adaptive Reuse Strategies. Drawings by Author. 

 

32 Gewirtzman, Dafna Fisher. 2017. “Adaptive Reuse Architecture Documentation and Analysis.” Journal 
of Architectural Engineering Technology 05 (03). https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9717.1000172.  

31 White, Edward T. Path--Portal--Place : Appreciating Public Space in Urban Environments. Tallahassee, 
FL: Architectural Media, 1999. 

12 

https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9717.1000172


 

Shift 

The "Shift" strategy involves altering the structural configuration of a building, repositioning its elements, 

or redistributing spaces to create a new architectural form. This approach pushes the boundaries of what 

the original structure can achieve by reimagining its spatial and structural potential. Whether tilting, 

rotating, or realigning structural components, the shift method transforms the building’s identity while 

maintaining a relationship with its history. The design outcome emphasizes dynamic movement and 

adaptability, aligning the old structure with modern-day architectural expressions and programmatic 

needs. 

 

Illustration 2 - Shift Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

Vertical Addition 

"Vertical Addition" expands a building upward, adding new levels or spaces atop the existing structure. 

This strategy capitalizes on vertical space to address urban density while preserving the footprint of the 

original building. Vertical additions often integrate modern construction methods and materials, 

contrasting with the existing architecture to create a harmonious dialogue between old and new. These 

additions not only increase functional capacity but also allow for innovative design interventions that 

amplify the building’s visual and cultural significance in the urban landscape. 

 

 

Illustration 3 - Vertical Addition Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

 

13 



 

Gutted 

The "Gutted" approach entails removing the interior of a building, leaving only the exterior shell or 

facade intact. This method preserves the external character of the structure while providing a blank canvas 

for creating entirely new interior spaces. By retaining the facade, gutted projects maintain a connection to 

the building’s historical or architectural identity. This strategy enables the reinvention of programmatic 

uses, ensuring that the building’s exterior presence continues to contribute to the urban fabric while 

meeting the standards and needs of today. 

 

 

Illustration 4 - Gutted Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

 

Reskin 

The "Reskin" strategy reimagines a building’s exterior while preserving much of its interior. This 

approach allows for a complete overhaul of the facade to reflect modern aesthetics, improve performance, 

or align with new programmatic goals. Reskinning can incorporate energy-efficient materials, modern 

design elements, or branding for commercial or institutional purposes. By transforming the building’s 

outward appearance, the reskin approach revitalizes its presence within the urban landscape, making it 

relevant to current architectural and cultural contexts. 

 

 

Illustration 5 - Reskin Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

 

14 



Attachment 

"Attachment" involves adding new architectural components to the sides of an existing structure. This 

lateral expansion can introduce entirely new programmatic functions, such as annexes, wings, or auxiliary 

spaces, that complement the original building’s use. Attachments are designed to maintain spatial and 

aesthetic harmony with the existing architecture, ensuring that the addition feels integrated rather than 

intrusive. This strategy enables flexibility in meeting evolving needs while preserving the historical or 

functional core of the building. 

 

 

Illustration 6 - Attachment Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

 

Wrap 

The "Wrap" strategy envelops an existing building within a new architectural layer, creating a distinct 

interplay between old and new. This method surrounds the original structure with additional 

programmatic spaces or design elements, effectively creating a "building within a building." The wrap can 

be functional, aesthetic, or both, offering opportunities for innovative spatial configurations and material 

contrasts. While the original structure remains an integral part of the project, the wrap redefines its 

identity and purpose within a larger architectural narrative. 

 

 

Illustration 7  - Wrap Design Strategy. Drawings by Author. 

 

These six strategies illustrate the creative and transformative possibilities of adaptive reuse, demonstrating 

that reimagining a building need not come at the expense of its historical and architectural integrity. Each 

15 



approach provides a flexible means of engaging with existing structures, challenging traditional 

perceptions of reuse, and offering innovative solutions for urban renewal. In later chapters, these 

strategies will serve as the foundation for exploring their application in conceptual and real-world 

projects. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16 



Chapter 4: Methodologies 

Research methodologies provide the foundation for thorough and structured inquiry, ensuring the 

investigation of adaptive reuse is both comprehensive and relevant to the thesis goals. Adaptive reuse is 

an inherently interdisciplinary subject, requiring methods that bridge architecture, urban planning, 

economics, and community engagement. This chapter outlines the diverse strategies employed to analyze 

the feasibility, cultural relevance, and economic viability of adaptive reuse projects, emphasizing the 

necessity of precision, clarity, and inclusivity in the research process. 

 

Field Studies and Site Observations 

Field studies and site observations are critical in understanding the physical and contextual characteristics 

of potential adaptive reuse projects. By directly engaging with the sites, these methods document the 

architectural, structural, and environmental conditions that influence design strategies. Observing the 

surrounding urban fabric provides insights into the neighborhood’s character and how adaptive reuse can 

enhance placemaking. These studies also help identify constraints, such as zoning regulations, and 

opportunities, such as integration with adjacent spaces, ensuring a grounded and realistic approach to 

project proposals. 

 

Archival Research 

Archival research investigates the historical and cultural background of the sites under consideration. 

Through the study of historical records, photographs, planning documents, and architectural drawings, 

this method identifies the evolution and legacy of existing structures. Archival findings enrich the project 

by ensuring that proposals respect the historical significance of the buildings while introducing functional 

modern elements.  

 

 

17 



Community Engagement through Interviews and Surveys 

Direct engagement with community members through interviews and surveys brings essential social and 

cultural dimensions to the research. Interviews with residents uncover their priorities, such as public 

spaces, housing needs, or cultural facilities, ensuring adaptive reuse projects address real community 

demands. Surveys broaden the scope, gathering data from a wider audience, including residents, local 

businesses, and city officials, to quantify public sentiment and identify shared goals. This approach 

enhances the project’s relevance by grounding it in the lived experiences and aspirations of the people it is 

designed to serve. 

 

Economic Analysis 

Economic feasibility is a cornerstone of adaptive reuse. This methodology examines the financial 

implications of proposed projects, including potential funding sources, profitability, and long-term 

economic impacts. By comparing the costs and benefits of adaptive reuse with those of demolition and 

new construction, this analysis highlights the advantages of preserving and repurposing existing 

structures. Additionally, this approach evaluates how adaptive reuse can stimulate local economies by 

attracting businesses, increasing property values, and creating jobs, reinforcing the argument for its 

adoption as a sustainable development strategy. 

 

Zoning, Policy, and Land Use Research 

Understanding the regulatory landscape is essential for the success of adaptive reuse projects. This 

methodology investigates zoning laws, building codes, and land use policies to identify potential barriers 

and opportunities for implementation. Research into policy frameworks provides clarity on compliance 

requirements and offers insights into how adaptive reuse projects can align with or influence municipal 

regulations. This knowledge equips the project with a strategic advantage in navigating the often complex 

regulatory environment. 

 

18 



Conclusion 

The methodologies outlined in this chapter create a robust framework for investigating adaptive reuse and 

its potential to transform urban spaces. By combining field studies, this approach ensures a holistic 

understanding of the challenges and opportunities inherent in adaptive reuse. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19 



Chapter 5: Precedent Studies 

Introduction 

Studying architectural precedents offers insight into adaptive reuse as a strategic alternative to 

demolishing or constructing completely new buildings. By selecting and analyzing different adaptive 

reuse precedents that correspond to the kit of parts design strategies, this chapter demonstrates various 

applications of reuse in different cultural and historical contexts. Each case exemplifies a unique 

adaptation approach, serving as a foundation for implementing these strategies in the thesis’s architectural 

project. The case studies reveal how adaptive reuse can foster the preservation of architectural heritage 

while achieving a balance between past, present, and future urban needs. 

 

Case Study 1: Louvre Modernization – Paris, France (1989) 

The Louvre Museum in Paris is a renowned example of "Gutted" adaptive reuse, selected due to its 

successful transformation from a royal palace to a public museum. Its layered historical architecture, 

spanning from medieval to modern interventions, encapsulates the continuity of Parisian cultural identity. 

The Louvre’s transformation exemplifies a sophisticated approach to retaining architectural heritage while 

integrating new functions. The project embodies the objectives of adaptive reuse by repurposing a 

historical structure for a modern, public purpose while respecting its architectural lineage. 

The Louvre, initially a medieval fortress, was redefined as a royal palace, then as a museum 

following the French Revolution. The "Grand Louvre" project under President François Mitterrand sought 

to modernize the museum while preserving its historical essence. Architect I.M. Pei’s intervention, 

particularly the iconic glass pyramid, represents a bold yet harmonious dialogue between historic and 

contemporary design. This intervention was intended to create a sense of transparency and accessibility 

while enhancing the museum’s functional and aesthetic qualities. 

The "Gutted" strategy at the Louvre involved selectively removing and altering interior spaces 

while preserving the historical facade and architectural integrity. The renovation’s long-term impact is 

20 



evident in its status as a global cultural landmark, drawing millions of visitors annually and contributing 

significantly to the local economy. The "Gutted" strategy at the Louvre demonstrates the potential of 

adaptive reuse to maintain historical significance while introducing modernity. The Louvre exemplifies 

how adaptive reuse can elevate historical architecture by integrating cultural functions into a single, 

cohesive design. 

The Louvre’s case provides valuable insights into maintaining architectural integrity and cultural 

identity in adaptive reuse, highlighting the potential for adaptive reuse to serve as a tool for cultural 

preservation. Studying this precedent informs strategies for balancing historical respect with innovative 

design. 

 

Illustration 8 - Louvre Figure Ground. Drawing by Author 

 

21 



 

Figure 1 - Plan Diagrams of Louvre Modernization33 

 

 

Figure 2 - Section Diagram of Louvre Modernization34 

 

Case Study 2: Library Escuelas Pías – Madrid, Spain (1996–2004) 

The Library Escuelas Pías, formerly a Baroque church and school, is an "Infill" example chosen for its 

adaptation from a site of worship to an educational space. Its selection is due to the seamless integration 

of historical damage with new function, demonstrating adaptive reuse's potential to embrace history's 

34 Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. "Grand Louvre Modernization." Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. Accessed 
October 10, 2024. https://www.pcf-p.com/projects/grand-louvre-modernization/. 
 

33 Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. "Grand Louvre Modernization." Pei Cobb Freed & Partners. 
https://www.pcf-p.com/projects/grand-louvre-modernization/.  
 

22 

https://www.pcf-p.com/projects/grand-louvre-modernization/
https://www.pcf-p.com/projects/grand-louvre-modernization/


scars rather than erase them. This case study offers insight into preserving a structure’s historical narrative 

while accommodating modern-day needs, resonating with the thesis’s objective to promote cultural 

continuity and resilience. The Escuelas Pías church, destroyed during the Spanish Civil War, remained a 

ruin until Linazasoro & Sanchez Arquitectura’s transformation into a library. The architectural design 

preserves the raw remnants of the church’s original brickwork, juxtaposing the past’s scars with modern 

elements. This fusion of old and new evokes a reverent atmosphere suitable for both academic and 

reflective purposes. 

 

 

Figure 3 - Exterior of Library Escuelas Pias35 

 

 

Figure 4 - Interior of Library Escuelas Pias36 

 

36  Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad van Cleempoel. 2019. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage : Concepts 
and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.  
 

35 Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad van Cleempoel. 2019. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage : Concepts 
and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.  

23 



The "gutted" strategy is displayed by retaining the church’s original shell while reconfiguring the 

interior. The lowered vault and new structural elements create an intimate environment within a grand 

structure, providing a meaningful space for academic study while respecting the building’s heritage. This 

case illustrates the adaptability of the "Gutted" approach across varied program spaces and cultural 

contexts. 

 

 

 

Illustration 9 - Plan Diagrams. Diagrams by Author. 

 

24 



 

Illustration 10 - Section Diagram37 

 

Case Study 3: Coal Drops Yard – London, UK (2014) 

Coal Drops Yard, a "Shift" strategy example, was chosen for its innovative transformation of twin 

Victorian coal warehouses into a new mixed-use retail and public space. This case exemplifies adaptive 

reuse’s flexibility in reviving industrial heritage while introducing new social and economic functions.  

 

 

Figure 5 - Coal Drops Yard Exterior Photo38 

 

 

38 Heatherwick Studio. "Coal Drops Yard." Heatherwick Studio. Accessed October 10, 2024. 
https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/.  

37 Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad van Cleempoel. 2019. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage : Concepts 
and Cases of an Emerging Discipline. 1st ed. New York: Routledge.  

25 

https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/


 

Figure 6 - Coal Drop Yards Touching Curves39 

 

Originally used for coal distribution in the 19th century, the warehouses at King’s Cross were 

partially abandoned by the 1990s. Heatherwick Studio’s design preserved the industrial character of the 

brick structures, while the dramatic upward sweep of the inner gabled roofs created a unified, visually 

striking canopy. This design approach respects the historical architecture while adding a new dimension 

that supports retail and public spaces, contributing to the area’s urban revitalization. 

 

 

Figure 7 - Prerenovated Section40 

40 Heatherwick Studio. "Coal Drops Yard." Heatherwick Studio. Accessed October 10, 2024. 
https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/.  

39 Heatherwick Studio. "Coal Drops Yard." Heatherwick Studio. Accessed October 10, 2024. 
https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/.  

26 

https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/
https://heatherwick.com/project/coal-drops-yard/


 

The "Shift" strategy is applied here, modifying the warehouses’ form to incorporate an additional 

upper level and central covered courtyard. This alteration creates a dynamic focal point for public 

interaction, redefining the building’s circulation and fostering new communal spaces. Coal Drops Yard 

illustrates how adaptive reuse can maintain industrial heritage while introducing newer architectural 

elements that promote social interaction, commerce, and cultural engagement. 

 

 

 

 

Illustration 11- Diagrams. Diagrams by Author. 

 

 

27 



Case Study 4: Port House – Antwerp, Belgium (2016) 

The Port House in Antwerp exemplifies the "Vertical Addition" strategy, selected for its dramatic 

combination of a modern crystalline structure with a historic fire station. Zaha Hadid Architects’ design 

showcases the adaptability of heritage buildings in accommodating new programmatic needs, highlighting 

the potential of vertical expansions to address urban density while respecting architectural heritage. 

 

 

Figure 8 - Exterior Photo of Port House41 

 

Antwerp’s fire station, initially constructed in the early 20th century, was repurposed as a port 

authority headquarters. Zaha Hadid’s vertical addition involved a cantilevered, faceted glass extension 

that hovers above the original structure, creating a striking contrast of old and new. This addition provides 

additional office space and a panoramic viewing deck, supporting the Port Authority’s administrative 

functions while symbolizing Antwerp’s forward-looking maritime identity. 

 

The "Vertical Addition" strategy is manifest in the floating extension, a bold architectural 

statement that enhances both functionality and aesthetic value. By elevating the original structure, the Port 

House illustrates how vertical expansion can create visually impactful, functional additions to heritage 

sites. 

41 “Port House – Zaha Hadid Architects.” n.d. Zaha Hadid Architects. 
https://www.zaha-hadid.com/architecture/port-house/.  

28 

https://www.zaha-hadid.com/architecture/port-house/


 

 

 

Illustration 12 - Diagrams. Diagrams by Author. 

 

Figure 9 - Section Port House Diagram42 

 

 

42 Van Gerrewey, Christophe. 2017. WAR OF THE WORLDS. The Architectural Review (London). Vol. 
242. London: Emap Limited. Zaha Hadid Architects. “Port House,” n.d.  
 

29 



Case Study 5: Zeitz MOCAA – Cape Town, South Africa (1924 / 2017)  

Zeitz MOCAA serves as a unique example of the "gutted" strategy, chosen for its transformation of a 

former grain silo into a contemporary art museum.  

 

Figure 10 - Exterior Photo of Zeitz MOCCA43 

 

 

Figure 11 - Heatherick Studio Rendering44 

44 Barasch, Daniel. 2019. Ruin and Redemption in Architecture. London: Phaidon Press Ltd.  
Heatherwick Studio. “Zeitz MOCAA,” n.d. https://heatherwick.com/projects/buildings/zeitz-mocaa/.  

43 Barasch, Daniel. 2019. Ruin and Redemption in Architecture. London: Phaidon Press Ltd.  
Heatherwick Studio. “Zeitz MOCAA,” n.d. https://heatherwick.com/projects/buildings/zeitz-mocaa/.  

30 



Originally built in 1924 as a grain silo, the structure fell into disuse in the 20th century. The 

adaptation by Heatherwick Studio involved carving into the dense concrete to create an atrium, revealing 

the silo’s monumental scale while housing exhibition spaces. This approach maintained the building’s 

industrial essence while reimagining it as a cathedral-like space for African contemporary art, 

contributing to Cape Town’s cultural identity. 

 

 

Figure 12 - Zeitz MOCAA Floor Plans45 

 

The special "gutted" strategy applied here involved hollowing out the part of the building’s core while 

preserving the rest of its iconic cylindrical silos, creating a grand interior that accommodates modern art 

exhibitions. This project exemplifies how the “Gutted” strategy doesn’t have to remove or change all of 

the interior parts of a building.  

45 Barasch, Daniel. 2019. Ruin and Redemption in Architecture. London: Phaidon Press Ltd.  
Heatherwick Studio. “Zeitz MOCAA,” n.d. https://heatherwick.com/projects/buildings/zeitz-mocaa/.  
 

31 



 

Illustration 13 - Diagrams. Diagrams by Author. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

32 



Chapter 6: Zones and Programming of Space 

The Programmatic Goals for the Adaptive Reuse Project 

For the proposed adaptive reuse project, the primary programmatic goals focus on economic 

generation, environmental integration, community restoration, and the creation of a cultural hub. Each of 

these goals plays a crucial role in the long-term success and sustainability of the development, offering 

multiple benefits to the community and the urban fabric at large. 

 

 

Illustration 14 - Program Goals Diagram. Diagram by Author. 

 

1.​ Economic Generation: The adaptive reuse project should include spaces that attract money. By 

providing mixed-use spaces, the development can stimulate local economic growth, create jobs, 

and increase property values in the surrounding area. These spaces should be flexible and 

adaptable to accommodate diverse uses, from office spaces to retail and residential properties. 

Creating a vibrant, mixed-use environment encourages foot traffic, boosts local businesses, and 

helps attract further investment into the community. 

 

33 



2.​ Environmental Integration: Incorporating green spaces and sustainable infrastructure is critical in 

the adaptive reuse of buildings, particularly as environmental sustainability becomes an 

increasingly urgent concern. The reuse of existing buildings contributes to sustainability by 

minimizing the need for new materials and reducing construction waste. Additionally, the project 

can incorporate renewable energy solutions, green roofs, rainwater harvesting systems, and 

efficient insulation to enhance environmental performance. Environmental integration goes 

beyond energy efficiency to create an urban landscape that supports biodiversity, promotes 

ecological balance, and provides citizens with green spaces that improve well-being. 

 

3.​ Community Restoration: The adaptive reuse project should prioritize community engagement and 

be designed to meet the needs of local residents. It can include affordable housing, spaces for 

local entrepreneurs, and amenities such as community centers or parks. The goal is to provide 

spaces that encourage social interaction, promote well-being, and restore a sense of pride and 

identity to the neighborhood. By integrating local culture and history into the project, adaptive 

reuse can help strengthen the community’s connection to the space and contribute to its resilience 

in the face of urban change. 

 

4.​ Cultural Hub: Finally, the project can function as a cultural hub, fostering artistic expression and 

community cohesion. Cultural spaces such as galleries, performance venues, or maker spaces can 

provide opportunities for local artists and residents to showcase their work, engage in creative 

endeavors, and celebrate the community's diversity. Creating an inclusive cultural hub within the 

adaptive reuse project can be transformative, encouraging civic participation, celebrating heritage, 

and contributing to a vibrant urban identity. 

 

 

 

34 



Coal Drops Yard: A Precedent for Adaptive Reuse in Urban Renewal 

One compelling example of adaptive reuse that aligns with the proposed program for this project 

is the Coal Drops Yard in London. Originally built in the 19th century to house coal drops, these industrial 

buildings had fallen into disuse by the late 20th century. However, the Coal Drops Yard development, 

which was completed in 2018, transformed the old warehouses into a dynamic mixed-use space, including 

retail shops, restaurants, office spaces, and cultural facilities. 

 

 

Figure 13 - Coal Drops Yard Aerial Photo46 

 

The Coal Drops Yard project provides a strong precedent for integrating historical architecture 

with modern needs in a way that revitalizes the surrounding urban area. One of the key aspects of the 

project is how it retains the character and identity of the original buildings while infusing them with new 

functions and uses. The development successfully blends the old and the new, preserving the buildings’ 

46 “Coal Drops Yard | Exceptional ALIEN.” 2023. Exceptionalalien.com. 2023. 
https://www.exceptionalalien.com/gems/coal-drops-yard.  

35 

https://www.exceptionalalien.com/gems/coal-drops-yard


unique industrial architecture while updating them for a new context. This preservation of architectural 

character contributes to the local identity, providing a sense of continuity that is often lost when buildings 

are demolished. 

Furthermore, Coal Drops Yard serves as a hub for commerce and culture, much like the proposed 

project. The adaptive reuse incorporates retail spaces, public gathering areas, and cultural events, 

fostering both economic growth and community engagement. The integration of open spaces and 

sustainable design practices also demonstrates how adaptive reuse can be aligned with environmental 

goals. The development provides a mixed environment that encourages foot traffic and draws both locals 

and visitors, thus contributing to the economic revitalization of the area. 

 

Illustration 15 - Reverse Engineering.47 

 

47 "Coal Drops Yard: Heatherwick Studio Raises the Roof." The Architects' Journal, October 18, 2018. 
https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/buildings/coal-drops-yard-heatherwick-studio-raises-the-roof.  

36 

https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/buildings/coal-drops-yard-heatherwick-studio-raises-the-roof


 

Illustration 16 - Reverse Engineering. Diagram by Author 

 

Coal Drops Yard also demonstrates the viability of adaptive reuse as a tool for urban regeneration. 

By transforming underutilized industrial buildings into a vibrant, high-demand destination, the project 

attracted significant investment and rejuvenated the surrounding neighborhood. The project illustrates 

how adaptive reuse can be a powerful economic engine for revitalization, generating long-term value 

while maintaining historical integrity and fostering a sense of place. 

 

Illustration 17  - Program zone scale comparison for the initial project. Diagram by Author. 

37 



Chapter 7: Site Selection 

Introduction 

An appropriate site is a cornerstone of any successful adaptive reuse project, particularly when 

the goal is to drive urban renewal. This process requires a comprehensive evaluation of a building's 

physical, historical, and contextual characteristics to ensure its potential to meet contemporary 

programmatic needs while preserving its inherent value. The site must align with both macro and 

micro-scale criteria, encompassing factors such as its location within the urban fabric, accessibility, 

environmental potential, and ability to integrate with community dynamics. 

 

Site Criteria 

When selecting a site for adaptive reuse through urban renewal, four key criteria, accessibility 

and visibility, architectural and historical significance, economic and development potential, and 

proximity to amenities, serve as critical benchmarks for evaluation. Accessibility and visibility ensure the 

site is well-connected to public transportation, pedestrian networks, and major thoroughfares, enhancing 

its functionality for residents, businesses, and visitors. A prominent and easily reachable location 

maximizes public engagement and contributes to the project’s success. Architectural and historical 

significance adds intrinsic value by preserving cultural heritage and unique design features, aligning with 

the goal of honoring the past while revitalizing for modern needs. Economic and development potential is 

essential for stimulating local growth, as the site should attract businesses, create jobs, and encourage 

investments that reinforce the surrounding community's prosperity. Finally, proximity to amenities such as 

parks, schools, cultural institutions, and retail spaces ensures the project becomes an integrated and active 

part of the urban fabric, promoting vibrant and sustainable urban living. These criteria will form a 

systematic framework for ranking potential sites later in this essay, prioritizing locations that balance 

historical preservation with modern adaptability and contribute to the broader objectives of urban 

renewal. 

38 



1)​ Accessibility & Visibility 

2)​ Architectural & Historical Significance 

3)​ Economic & Development Potential 

4)​ Amenity Proximity 

 

 

Illustration 18 - Site Criteria ranking matrix of proposed analyzed sites. Drawing by Author. 

 

 

Site Selection 

This section analyzes three potential sites for adaptive reuse: the American Ice Company in Baltimore, the 

Hendler Creamery in Baltimore, and the Uptown Theatre in Philadelphia. Each site offers unique 

historical significance, architectural features, and economic potential that could contribute to the 

revitalization of their respective neighborhoods. 

 

Site A: The American Ice Company 

The American Ice Company building, located at 2102 W Franklin St, Baltimore, is a prime example of 

the city's industrial heritage. Built-in the early 20th century, this site served as a critical component in 

Baltimore’s ice distribution industry, a key sector during the city's industrial boom. The building’s 

39 



distinctive architecture, with large brick facades and expansive warehouse spaces, offers significant 

potential for adaptive reuse. Its large footprint and high ceilings could support a variety of mixed-use 

developments, including commercial spaces, retail, and residential units. 

Despite its architectural charm, the American Ice Company building faces challenges. Its location 

in a lower-density neighborhood, though within reach of Baltimore’s revitalization efforts, means that its 

surroundings may not attract as much foot traffic or economic investment compared to other more 

developed parts of the city. Additionally, while the site benefits from proximity to transit options, such as 

bus routes and the nearby MARC train, it lacks the same level of connectivity and infrastructure as other 

potential sites. However, the building’s historical significance and the ongoing gentrification in the area 

make it a strong candidate for adaptive reuse, especially with a focus on preserving its industrial character 

while introducing modern uses. 

 

Figure 14 - Aerial Map48 

48 Aerial  view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

40 



   

Figure 15 - Street Views49 

 

Illustration 19 - Diagram. Drawing by Author50 

50 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 
49 Street view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

41 



 

Illustration 20 - Diagram. Drawing by Author51 

 

Figure 16 - Baltimore City American Ice Company Plat Map52 

52 “B-1040 American Ice Company.” 2016. MEDUSA - Maryland’s’ Cultural Resource Information System. 
Maryland Historical Trust. https://apps.mht.maryland.gov/Medusa/PDF/BaltimoreCity/B-1040.pdf. 

51 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

42 



Site B: Hendler Creamery 

The Hendler Creamery, located at 1100 East Baltimore Street in Baltimore, Maryland, represents an 

important part of the city’s industrial past and offers tremendous potential for adaptive reuse. Originally 

constructed in 1892 as the Baltimore City Passenger Railway powerhouse.  In the 1920s, the site was 

acquired and repurposed by Lionel Manuel Hendler and Louis Miller, who transformed the structure into 

the Hendler Creamery with a significant architectural expansion. 

This transformation marked the beginning of one of the first fully automated ice cream factories 

in the United States. At its peak, the Hendler Creamery distributed its products to hundreds of  stores 

across Maryland, establishing itself as a regional icon in food production and innovation.53 The building’s 

industrial character and historical legacy reflect both Baltimore’s manufacturing heritage and early 

twentieth-century advancements in automated food processing. In recognition of its architectural and 

historical significance, the Hendler Creamery was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 

2007.54 

 

Figure 17 - Hendler Creamery Area Map55 

55 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

54 National Register of Historic Places  , “Hendler Creamery,” National Park Service (U.S. Department of 
the Interior, August 24, 2007), 
https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail/3fc9c1c5-8435-4361-8e10-e7235e84b3d3.  

53  Maryland Center for History and Culture, “The Velvet Kind: The Sweet Story of Hendlers Creamery,” 
Maryland Center for History and Culture, July 18, 2013, 
https://www.mdhistory.org/the-velvet-kind-the-sweet-story-of-hendlers-creamery/.  

43 

https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail/3fc9c1c5-8435-4361-8e10-e7235e84b3d3
https://www.mdhistory.org/the-velvet-kind-the-sweet-story-of-hendlers-creamery/


 

Figure 18 - Hendler Creamery Streets Views56 

 

Illustration 21 - Neighborhood Map. Drawing by Author.57 

57 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 
56 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 
 

44 



 

 

Illustration 22 - Neighborhood Map. Drawing by Author.58 

 

Strategically located in an up-and-coming part of Baltimore, the Hendler Creamery sits near key 

transit routes such as the Light Rail Link and is just a short distance from downtown Baltimore. The site’s 

proximity to the city’s medical district, major cultural institutions, and educational centers further 

enhances its appeal. Furthermore, the surrounding neighborhoods have experienced significant investment 

and redevelopment, which bodes well for the future success of any adaptive reuse project. 

The creamery's location and architectural significance make it a prime candidate for 

revitalization, offering the opportunity to reimagine an underutilized building within a high-potential area. 

The economic promise of the site is further reinforced by its large footprint, making it suitable for 

mixed-use development that aligns with citywide planning goals aimed at creating vibrant and sustainable 

urban environments. 

 

58 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

45 



 

Figure 19 - Hendler Creamery Plans59 

 

 

59 “NPS Form 10-900 - National Register of Historic Places Registration Form .” 1990. MEDUSA - 
Maryland’s’ Cultural Resource Information System. United States Department of the Interior National Park 
Service. https://apps.mht.maryland.gov/Medusa/PDF/NR_PDFs/NR-1451.pdf.  

46 

https://apps.mht.maryland.gov/Medusa/PDF/NR_PDFs/NR-1451.pdf


Unfortunately, despite strong advocacy from preservationists and members of the local 

community, the city has continued with plans for the building’s demolition. This tension highlights a 

broader disconnect between rapid urban development initiatives and community-driven efforts to preserve 

Baltimore’s historic architectural assets. 

 

Site C: Uptown Theatre 

The Uptown Theatre, located at 2240 N Broad St, Philadelphia, stands as one of the city’s iconic historic 

landmarks. Opened in 1929, the theater once served as a grand venue for film screenings and live 

performances. The building’s rich history and unique architectural features, such as its ornate façade, 

decorative interiors, and large auditorium, make it a compelling candidate for adaptive reuse. Given its 

location along the Broad Street corridor, a major transit line in Philadelphia, the Uptown Theatre is easily 

accessible via the Broad Street Subway, bus routes, and the regional rail network. 

 

Figure 20 - Uptown Theatre Site Area60 

60 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

47 



 

Figure 21 - Uptown Theatre Street Views61 

 

Illustration 23 - Neighborhood Diagram. Drawing by Author62 

62 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 
61 Street view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

48 



 

Illustration 24 - Accessibility Diagram. Drawing by Author63 

63 Aerial view, Google Earth, accessed November 2024. 

49 



 

Figure 22 - Uptown Theatre Plan64 

 

While the Uptown Theatre has significant cultural and architectural value, the surrounding 

neighborhood has faced socioeconomic challenges. Located between the Hartranft and Cecil B. Moore 

neighborhoods, the area is in the midst of a transition, with gentrification spurring economic development 

and attracting new investments. However, the immediate vicinity is still considered lower-income, and 

much of the surrounding infrastructure is outdated. The building itself, despite its historical charm, would 

require substantial renovations to meet modern codes and accommodate new uses. 

Nevertheless, the Uptown Theatre is an important part of Philadelphia's cultural fabric. Its 

location in a high-visibility area, near educational institutions like Temple University, makes it an ideal 

64 Magaziner, Eberhard, and Harris, Architects. 1927. First Floor Plan. The Athenaeum of Philadelphia. 

50 



location for cultural programs, performance spaces, and community-focused initiatives. With the right 

investment and community support, the theater could serve as a cultural anchor in a revitalizing 

neighborhood. However, its economic potential may be limited by the need for extensive structural work 

and the ongoing challenges faced by the surrounding community.  

 

Conclusion 

The adaptive reuse of historic buildings is a powerful tool for urban renewal. Among the three sites 

analyzed, the American Ice Company, Hendler Creamery, and Uptown Theatre, the Hendler Creamery 

offers the best potential for adaptive reuse. Its strategic location, historical significance, and alignment 

with Baltimore’s urban planning initiatives make it a prime candidate for revitalization. With the right 

investment and vision, the Hendler Creamery can play a key role in shaping the future of Baltimore’s 

urban landscape, contributing to the city’s ongoing efforts to revitalize its industrial past while embracing 

new possibilities for the future. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

51 



Chapter 8: Exploring Strategies 

Introduction 

The Hendler Creamery in Baltimore offers a unique canvas for exploring early-stage concepts and 

experimental strategies in adaptive reuse. With its rich industrial history, the site presents strong potential 

for urban renewal by balancing the preservation of historical identity with the integration of contemporary 

architectural needs. This chapter presents three conceptual design schemes—Duo, Parasite, and 

Continuation—as speculative studies that apply six adaptive reuse strategies: Shift, Vertical Addition, 

Gutted, Reskin, Attachment, and Wrap. These explorations aim to demonstrate how creative interventions 

might reimagine the creamery as a vibrant, multi-functional space. 

 

Illustration 25 - Kit of Parts design strategies concepts individually applied. Drawing by Author. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

52 



Exploration 1: Duo 

The Duo scheme utilizes the design strategies of Attachment, Reskin, and Gutted to conceptualize a 

twin-like structure next to the Hendler Creamery. This approach creates a massing that mirrors the 

creamery’s original form while introducing a new architectural layer.  

 

Illustration 26 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author.  

 

Exploration 2: Parasite 

The Parasite scheme combines the design strategies of Wrap, Attachment, Reskin, Gutted, and Vertical 

Addition to create the effect of new architectural massing seemingly growing out of the Hendler 

Creamery. 

53 



 

Illustration 27 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author.  

 

Exploration 3: Continuation   

The Continuation scheme extends the Hendler Creamery’s industrial typology using the strategies of 

Attachment, Reskin, and Gutted. Lower-height architectural additions are attached to the existing building, 

preserving its dominance while expanding its spatial capacity. The new extensions adopt the industrial 

rhythm and materiality of the creamery, ensuring visual continuity across the site. 

 

 

Illustration 28 - Kit of Parts design strategies schemed. Drawing by Author.  

54 



Chapter 9: Design Evolution 
 
 

The initial design proposal for the Hendler Creamery began with a focused scope to explore adaptive 

reuse strategies through conceptual interventions within the existing building. At this early stage, the 

intent was to preserve the structure’s industrial heritage and test a series of strategies without introducing 

any additional buildings to the site. The remainder of the site was left as unprogrammed open green space, 

intended only as a passive landscape surrounding the repurposed creamery. 

Through further site analysis and research into the surrounding urban context, it became clear that 

the original vision did not fully respond to the community’s needs. The Hendler Creamery is located in a 

historically underserved area of Baltimore, where access to critical resources and infrastructure is limited. 

The neighborhood faces a lack of healthy food options, limited access to regulated athletic facilities, and a 

general shortage of welcoming public amenities. In response to these challenges, the project evolved into 

a comprehensive community-oriented proposal that expanded beyond the reuse of the existing building. 

 

 
 

Illustration 29 - Aerial final aerial design isometric. Drawing by Author.  
 
 

55 



       
Illustration 30 - Program diagram isometric. Drawing by Author.  

 
 

The revised design positions the site as a civic and wellness anchor for the surrounding 

neighborhood. While the adaptive reuse of the Hendler Creamery remains central, two new buildings 

were added to the site, forming a larger intervention now referred to as Hendler Hall and the McKim 

Recreation Center. This expanded program not only preserves historical character but also addresses 

public health, recreation, and food equity. 

 

 

56 



 
 

Illustration 31 - Hendler Hall interior main hall rendering. Drawing by Author.  
 
 

Within the newly designated Hendler Hall, the design introduces an affordable food and grocery 

hall, responding to the site’s location within a food desert. The interior of the creamery has been 

reconfigured using the gutted strategy while the exterior is treated with a reskin on the east side facade to 

preserve its architectural presence. During daytime hours, the space functions as a healthy food market 

with a focus on affordability and accessibility. In the evening, it can transition into a flexible venue space 

for community events and gatherings. 

 
 

 
 

Illustration 32 - E Baltimore St Elevation. Drawing by Author.  
 
 

57 



 
 

Illustration 33 - Hendler Hall site section. Drawing by Author.  
 
 
 

To support the health and recreational needs of the community, the two newly constructed 

buildings within the lot serve as the McKim Recreation Center. Building 1 features retail space on the 

ground floor, encouraging local business activation, and a fitness gym on the upper level. A bridge 

connects Building 1 to Building 2 on the upper floor, facilitating circulation between the two structures 

and organizing the recreation complex as a cohesive unit. 

  
Illustration 34 - Site Ground Floor Plan. Drawing by Author.  

 
 
 

58 



 
 

Illustration 35 - Upper Floor Plan. Drawing by Author.  
 
 
 

 

 
 

Illustration 36 - Upper Mezzanine Floor Plan. Drawing by Author.  
 

59 



 
 

Building 2 serves as the primary entrance to the recreation center and includes multiple 

recreational amenities. Below ground level, the building houses a regulation-size swimming pool, 

addressing a known shortage of competition-ready aquatic facilities in the Baltimore area. The ground 

floor includes seating areas, a staffed lobby, and circulation space, while the upper floor contains two 

full-size basketball courts along with an indoor running track situated on a mezzanine. These features 

reflect a response to the limited access to large-scale indoor sports facilities within the surrounding 

neighborhoods. 

Together, Hendler Hall and the McKim Recreation Center occupy approximately three-quarters of 

the site. The remaining quarter is dedicated to a new public green space, providing outdoor seating and 

flexible gathering space. This area forms a direct pedestrian connection between Hendler Hall and the 

historic McKim Center across the street, strengthening ties between the existing community institutions 

and reinforcing the site’s role as a public destination. 

 

 

Illustration 37 - Hendler Hall and green space exterior perspective. Drawing by Author.  

60 



The design was guided by the principle of addressing specific community needs. The lack of 

affordable grocery options, full-court indoor basketball facilities, regulated swimming pools, and 

year-round running infrastructure informed the final program. The architecture reflects these priorities 

while remaining sensitive to the scale, history, and context of the surrounding area. 

This chapter represents the transition from conceptual exploration to a realized design vision 

rooted in context, equity, and public value. What began as a focused adaptive reuse study developed into a 

site-wide proposal that promotes urban renewal through architectural intervention and 

community-focused programming. 

 

 
 

Illustration 38 - Hendler Creamery extended lot timeline. Drawing by Author.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

61 



Chapter 10: Conclusion 

Introduction 

The ongoing transformation of urban landscapes globally is shaped by various forces; population growth, 

economic shifts, and environmental concerns. In many cases, the pressure to demolish aging buildings 

and replace them with new developments has overshadowed the potential benefits of adaptive reuse. This 

thesis has aimed to explore how adaptive reuse can be harnessed as a dynamic tool for urban renewal, 

offering sustainable, culturally sensitive alternatives to traditional demolition. By integrating innovative 

design strategies, such as the "kit of parts" approach, adaptive reuse can not only preserve the 

architectural and historical value of existing structures but also create vibrant, functional spaces that 

address the needs of contemporary urban life. 

 

Findings 

The research has shown that adaptive reuse is more than just a tool for maintaining the aesthetic integrity 

of older buildings. It is a multifaceted approach that can revitalize communities, stimulate economic 

growth, and foster sustainability. For example, sites such as the Hendler Creamery offer the potential to 

create mixed-use developments, integrating residential, commercial, and public spaces, which can serve 

as anchors for surrounding neighborhoods.  

 

Development 

The practical application of adaptive reuse strategies, as outlined through the case studies and design 

schemes, has reinforced the concept that adaptive reuse is not just about preserving old buildings but 

reimagining them to serve modern functions. The schemes presented for the Hendler Creamery, from Duo 

to Parasite to Continuation, illustrate how different design strategies can transform an industrial building 

into a dynamic, multifunctional space. These strategies, work together to breathe new life into structures, 

reinterpreting them for contemporary use while maintaining their historical significance. 

62 



Furthermore, the application of adaptive reuse not only addresses urban sprawl but also reduces 

construction waste, providing an environmentally responsible solution to urban development. The reuse 

of existing buildings leads to lower carbon footprints, less demolition waste, and an overall more 

sustainable approach to city-building. This has significant implications for urban planners, developers, 

and communities alike, encouraging a shift away from the destructive cycle of demolition and new build 

towards more sustainable, restorative urban development. 

Ultimately, adaptive reuse strategies serve as a critical framework for addressing the challenges 

posed by urbanization. This thesis underscores the transformative potential of adaptive reuse, showcasing 

how it can preserve and enhance the identity of urban areas while offering sustainable solutions for the 

future. Moving forward, these strategies could be crucial in shaping cities that not only respect their past 

but are also capable of evolving to meet future demands. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

63 



Appendices 

Conceptual Studies 

 

Illustration 39 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author.  
 

 

Illustration 40 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author.  
 

64 



 

Illustration 41 - Conceptual Massing Study. Drawing by Author.  
 

 

Illustration 42 - Conceptual Ground Floor Plan Study. Drawing by Author 

 

65 



Bibliography 

Albro, Sandra. Vacant to Vibrant: Creating Successful Green Infrastructure Networks. 1st ed. Washington,  
DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 2019. 
https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-901-2. 

 
Bohl, Charles C. Place Making: Developing Town Centers, Main Streets, and Urban Villages.  

Washington, D.C: Urban Land Institute, 2002. 
 
Brantz, Dorothee, and Avi Sharma. Urban Resilience in a Global Context: Actors, Narratives, and  

Temporalities. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839450185. 
 
Clark, Woodrow W., ed. Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook: Green Engineering,  

Architecture, and Technology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, an imprint of Elsevier,  
2018. 

 
Cohen, Steven. The Sustainable City. Columbia University Press, 2018. JSTOR,  

https://doi.org/10.7312/cohe18204. 
 
Cummings, Scott. Business Elites and Urban Development: Case Studies and Critical Perspectives.  

Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988. 
 
Findlay, M. John. Magic Lands: Western Cityscapes and American Culture After 1940. Berkeley:  

University of California Press, 1992. 
 
Firley, Eric, and Victor Deupi. The Urban Housing Handbook. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley  

& Sons, Inc., 2023. 
 
Fisher-Gewirtzman, Dafna. “The Impact of Alternative Interior Configurations on the Perceived Density  

of Micro Apartments.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 34 (4): 336–58, 2017. 
 
Gabbe, C.J. “Looking Through the Lens of Size: Land Use Regulations and Micro-Apartments in San  

Francisco.” Cityscape (Washington, D.C.) 17 (2): 223–38, 2015. 
 
Goh, Kian. Form and Flow: The Spatial Politics of Urban Resilience and Climate Justice. Cambridge,  

Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12801.001.0001. 
 
Hanson, Royce. Rethinking Urban Policy: Urban Development in an Advanced Economy. 1st ed.  

Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, 1983. 
 
Hohlfeldt, Marion, and Carmen Popescu, eds. Living Politics in the City: Architecture as Catalyst for  

Public Space. Leuven University Press, 2023. 
 
Huang, Yijing, Wanyue Wei, and Fernando A. F. Ferreira. “How To Make Urban Renewal Sustainable?  

Pathway Analysis Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA).” International  
Journal of Strategic Property Management 27 (3): 146–58, 2023. 
https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2023.19352. 

 
 

66 

https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-901-2
https://doi.org/10.7312/cohe18204
https://doi.org/10.7312/cohe18204
https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2023.19352
https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2023.19352


Jacovine, Thiago Correa, Kaio Nogueira, Camila Nastari Fernandes, and Gabriel Marques da Silva.  
“Evidence-Based Planning: A Multi-Criteria Index for Identifying Vacant Properties in Large  
Urban Centres.” Urban Planning 7 (3): 285-, 2022. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5369. 

 
Jewish Museum of Maryland. “Hendler Creamery Company.” Explore Baltimore Heritage, 2023.  

https://explore.baltimoreheritage.org/items/show/371. 
 
Kivell, Philip. Land and the City: Patterns and Processes of Urban Change. 1st ed. London: Routledge,  

1993. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420232. 
 
Krier, Léon, Dhiru A Thadani, and Peter J Hetzel. The Architecture of Community. 1st ed. Washington,  

D.C: Island Press, 2009. 
 
Lin, Desen. “From Vacancy to Verdancy? The Impact of Land Options on the Timing of Vacant Lot  

Investment.” Real Estate Economics 52 (5): 1263–1307, 2024.  
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12487. 

 
Low, Setha M. Why Public Space Matters. Oxford University Press USA, 2021. 
 
Maryland Center for History and Culture. “The Velvet Kind: The Sweet Story of Hendlers Creamery.”  

Maryland Center for History and Culture, July 18, 2013. 
https://www.mdhistory.org/the-velvet-kind-the-sweet-story-of-hendlers-creamery/.  

 
Moor, Malcolm, and Jon Rowland, eds. Urban Design Futures. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017. 
 
Muller, Bernhard. Urban Regional Resilience: How Do Cities and Regions Deal with Change? 1st ed.  

Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12785-4. 
 
Natarajan, Lucy, and Michael Short. Engaged Urban Pedagogy: Participatory Practices in Planning and  

Place-Making. UCL Press, 2023. 
 
National Register of Historic Places  . “Hendler Creamery.” National Park Service. U.S. Department of  

the Interior, August 24, 2007. 
https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail/3fc9c1c5-8435-4361-8e10-e7235e84b3d3.  

 
Németh, Jeremy, and Joern Langhorst. “Rethinking Urban Transformation: Temporary Uses for Vacant  

Land.” Cities 40 (b): 143–50, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.007. 
 
Newman, Galen D, Alison L Smith, and Samuel D Brody. “Repurposing Vacant Land through Landscape  

Connectivity.” Landscape Journal 36 (1): 37–57, 2017. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.1.37. 
Nicholas A. Phelps. Sequel to Suburbia: Glimpses of America’s Post-Suburban Future.  
Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2015. 

 
O’Callaghan, Cian, and Cesare Di Feliciantonio, eds. The New Urban Ruins: Vacancy, Urban Politics,  

and International Experiments in the Post-Crisis City. 1st ed. Bristol: Policy Press, 2021.  
https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447356899. 

 
O’Donoghue, Daniel P. Urban Transformations: Centres, Peripheries, and Systems. 1st ed. London:  

Routledge, 2016. 
 
 

67 

https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i3.5369
https://explore.baltimoreheritage.org/items/show/371
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203420232
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12487
https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12487
https://www.mdhistory.org/the-velvet-kind-the-sweet-story-of-hendlers-creamery/
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12785-4
https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/AssetDetail/3fc9c1c5-8435-4361-8e10-e7235e84b3d3
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.04.007
https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.36.1.37
https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447356899
https://doi.org/10.56687/9781447356899


Orvell, Miles, and Jeffrey L Meikle. Public Space and the Ideology of Place in American Culture. 1st ed.  
Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2009. 

 
 
Plevoets, Bie, and Koenraad van Cleempoel. Adaptive Reuse of the Built Heritage: Concepts and Cases of  

an Emerging Discipline. 1st ed. New York: Routledge, 2019. 
 

Porta, Sergio, Kevin Thwaites, and Ombretta Romice. Urban Sustainability through Environmental  
Design: Approaches to Time - People - and Place Responsive Urban Spaces. London: Taylor &  
Francis, 2007. 
 

Rigolon, Alessandro, William P Stewart, and Paul H Gobster. “What Predicts the Demand and Sale of  
Vacant Public Properties? Urban Greening and Gentrification in Chicago.” Cities 107: 102948,  
2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102948. 

 
Schröpfer, Thomas, and Kees Christiaanse. Dense + Green: Innovative Building Types for Sustainable  

Urban Architecture. 1st ed. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038210146. 
 
Sheppard, Mark, and Andrew Weatherill. Essentials of Urban Design. Clayton, Victoria: CSIRO  

Publishing, 2015. 
 
Silverman, Robert Mark, Li Yin, and Kelly L Patterson. “Dawn of the Dead City: An Exploratory  

Analysis of Vacant Addresses in Buffalo, NY 2008-2010.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (2):  
131–52, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00627.x. 

 
Simon, Mariann, and Amine Mseddi. “The Vacant Urban Space: Problems, Possibilities, Processes.”  

Periodica Polytechnica Architecture 51 (2): 101–7, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.15749. 
 
Sinclair, Olivia Anne. “Vacant to Vibrant: Transforming Vacant Lots in North Philadelphia.” West  

Virginia University, 2022. 
 
Thompson, Catharine Ward. “Urban Open Space in the 21st Century.” Landscape and Urban Planning 60  

(2): 59–72, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2. 
 
Wachter, Susan M, and Kimberly Zeuli. Revitalizing American Cities. 1st ed. Philadelphia: University of  

Pennsylvania Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208887. 
 
Wong, Liliane. Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. 1st ed. Boston: Birkhauser, 2017.  

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038213130. 
 
Zhang, Pan, and Sohyun Park. “VLAS: Vacant Land Assessment System for Urban Renewal and  

Greenspace Planning in Legacy Cities.” Sustainability 15 (12): 9525-, 2023.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129525. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

68 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102948
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038210146
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00627.x
https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.15749
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2
https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812208887
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038213130
https://doi.org/10.1515/9783038213130
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129525
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129525


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

69