ABSTRACT Tittle of thesis: Thesis directed by: RAPID DESTABILIZATION OF DEEP, SUPERHYDROUS MAGMA PRIOR TO THE LARGEST KNOWN PLINIAN ERUPTION OF CERRO MACHIN VOLCANO, COLOMBIA Silvia Camila Castilla Montagut Master of Science, 2022 Professor Megan Newcombe Department of Geology A detailed stratigraphy of the pyroclastic fall deposits associated with Cerro Machin volcano (CMV) is presented following a previously defined categorization of the different eruptive units: El Espartillal, P0, P1, El Guaico, P2 and El Anillo. For the largest Plinian eruption in the sequence (P1), two lithofacies were distinguished on the basis of sedimentary features, grain size and componentry analysis. Early stages of the eruption could have been associated with vulcanian-type phases characterized by conduit/plug clearing explosions, producing a monolithologic lithic-rich laminated basal layer. The climactic event is represented by a white to grey, clast-supported, reverse to normally graded pumice-rich lapilli layer formed by a sustained eruptive column that gradually waned towards the end of the eruption. Associated deposits were identified up to 40 km from the vent. Pumice clasts from the most explosive phase were sampled along the deposit layer in order to characterize storage conditions and ascent rates for the magma erupted. Pumice samples were classified as medium-K, calc-alkaline dacites (63-67 wt.% SiO2). The mineral assemblage includes plagioclase+amphibole+biotite+quartz and olivine and orthopyroxene (Fo 89-92) as accessory phases with amphibole overgrowths. Geothermobarometry of unzoned amphiboles, cores of reversely zoned crystals and rims of normally zoned crystals indicate a temperature range from 825±17°C and 913±45°C, a pressure range from 270±75 MPa to 1000±320 MPa indicating crystallization depths of 8-29 km. Thermobarometry of minor populations of unzoned amphibole crystals, cores of normally zoned crystals and rims of reversely zoned amphiboles show the same crystallization pressures as the dominant amphibole populations, but higher temperatures between 850±17°C and 978±29°C. The presence of these small populations of high-temperature amphiboles suggests a minor recharge event that did not drastically change the average crystallization conditions of the main dacitic reservoir but that could have been the trigger mechanism for the explosive eruption. CMV dacites display several geochemical signatures of adakites (low Y < 14 ppm, high Sr >700ppm, high Al2O3 > 16 wt.%, low MgO < 3 wt.%) which suggest that CMV magmas are produced by fractional crystallization of primitive hydrous magmas at the Moho boundary. The primitive magmas could have been the result of the interaction between Ba-enriched fluids dehydrated from the subducted slab with mantle peridotite in the mantle wedge. Three lines of evidence support the presence of superhydrous magma (containing >~8 wt% H2O) beneath Cerro Machin: 1) water concentrations of 2–11 wt% measured in plagioclase- and quartz-hosted melt inclusions; 2) the presence of Fo89-92 olivine rimmed by high Mg# amphibole; and 3) measurements of ~100–167 ppm H2O in plagioclase phenocrysts. Assuming a partition coefficient of 0.002, measured plagioclase crystals crystallized in a melt with 5-8 wt% H2O. Water-diffusion modelling in plagioclase crystals indicates a minimum time of 1 day for the magma to ascend from shallow depth (<250 MPa, ~5 km) before the eruption. Rapid ascent times are also suggested by the absence of breakdown rims in amphibole crystals which indicate a magma ascent timescale of <4 days from 8 km to the surface (Rutherford & Hill, 1993). Results from this study indicate that the 3600 yr BP eruption was preceded by rapid mobilization and ascent of superhydrous dacitic magma from mid- to deep-crustal storage regions beneath Cerro Machin. This thesis comprises eight appendices (A-H), Appendix A contains fieldwork information including: map of locations, a description of sample labels and schematic stratigraphic columns. In Appendix B, descriptions of componentry analysis are presented as well as pictures of the different grains identified under binocular observations. Appendix C is conformed by ten petrographic forms in which petrographic observations are detailed. This is followed by Appendix D in which whole rock chemistry of five samples is listed. In Appendix E, water measurements in melt inclusions are presented. In Appendix F, measurements of water in feldspar are detailed while in Appendix G, glass, melt inclusions, mineral chemistry and pictures of each crystal are presented, it also contains plagioclase-melt and amphibole-melt equilibrium tests and geothermobarometry calculations. Finally, Appendix H contains the link with the repository of the Matlab code used for volatile diffusion modelling in feldspar. RAPID DESTABILIZATION OF DEEP, SUPERHYDROUS MAGMA PRIOR TO THE LARGEST KNOWN PLINIAN ERUPTION OF CERRO MACHIN VOLCANO, COLOMBIA by Silvia Camila Castilla Montagut Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2022 Advisory committee: Professor Megan Newcombe, Chair Professor. Philip Piccoli Professor Sarah Penniston-Dorland © Copyright by Silvia Camila Castilla Montagut 2022 ii Acknowledgments My journey would not have been the same without all the people I met along the way and for whom I will always feel grateful and blessed. With mixed feelings of happiness and nostalgia, I would like to thank all of you who, in one way or another, contribute to my professional and personal growth in these two years and made this experience one of the best decisions of my life. I would like to start expressing my deepest gratitude to my amazing and wonderful supervisor Megan, in who I always found guidance, expertise and interesting discussions. Your continuous support and encouragement, your enthusiasm for science and the compassion for your students have inspired in me the kind of scientist I want to be. Thank you for always be a confident place to express my ideas and opinions, a friendly face every week during two years and of course the most contagious laugh ever. You are by far the best definition of a mentor, and I will be eternally grateful for the amazing experience we had working together. I also would like to say a huge thank you to the members of my thesis committee, Professor Sarah Penniston-Dorland and Professor Philip Piccoli. I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Phil, whose most intriguing and interesting questions vastly influenced my critical thinking and my passion for science, for his assistance with the electron microprobe analysis and for always being a helping hand without hesitation. To my lab mates: Cosmo, Kyle, Liam, MaKayla, Ayomide, Sumedah and Kathy, whose their great sense of humor always brought me joy on our group meetings. I am grateful to the Geology Department community of the University of Maryland for providing a warm and fertile working environment. iii I am deeply indebted to the Fulbright program for financing this study, for giving me the opportunity to represent my country Colombia and for the incredible friendships I made through the Fulbright community. Major thanks to the Colombian Geological Survey, for the support in the initial stage of my research providing samples of Galeras volcano which unfortunately could not been used for my studies. Special thanks to my constant support and guidance, profe Natalia Pardo, for always being part of my academic growth and for your unconditional help in every stage of my professional life. To Ricardo Mendez, Diego Gomez, Gloria Patricia Cortes, Marta Calvache, Ana Maria Correa and Carlos Zuluaga for their support and guidance at the any stage of this project. My experience was indelibly enriched by the wonderful friendships I gained from this journey. I would like to mention my friends Jacek, Sergio, Cesar, my friends from the Fulbright community: Ariko, Juliane, Nina, Khursheed, Juan, Vera and Andrea, my friends from the Latin crew: Jairo, Julio, Aldana, Mari, Share, Nico, Sofi, Max, Manuel, Tania, William, and Sergio – thank you for the parties, barbecues, laughs, beers, arepas and the uncountable memories I will keep forever. I would like to thank the members of the soccer team Hakuna Matata, present and past: Kyle, Karla, Liam, Jiayang, Elaine, Sergio, Diego, Sam, Sarah, Melody, Maya, Jacek, Garyson, Tania, Julio, Manuel, Cesar, Jacob and Megan. it was an honor being your captain and a total pleasure to play with you every weekend. I also thank my roommates Yousra, Veronica and Johanna, for listening to me after long and stressful days, for sharing with me your life stories, for supporting me during my personal challenges, for becoming a family to me in this new country, for the laughs and secrets we shared and the bond we have built. I want to specially thank my roommate and friend Johanna in who I found a sister, and who always iv made me feel close to Colombia. Thank you for spoling me, for motivating me every time I needed, for always being willing to listen and share, for crying with me and of course for the delicious muesli, arepas, pan de bonos, pan de yucas, chocolate caliente and everything you always did with love for me. Thank you from the bottom of my heart to my family in Colombia, to my dad, my sister and specially to my beautiful mom who every day sent me her love, support and funny pictures of Matata. To my friends all around the world Ana, Mari, Ale, Laura, Natis and Sergio that were always supporting me and have been fans #1 of my dreams. Last, but not least, I would like to dedicate this thesis to my lovely husband, Juan David, who has witnessed my process since the first day and has helped me to get through all the existential crisis that graduate school can potentially arise. Thank you for always believing in me, for supporting my dreams, for your help in the fieldwork we did for this research and for using it as the perfect excuse to propose and made me the happiest woman ever. Thank you for helping me during long summer days in the lab polishing melt inclusions, for practicing with me every presentation I did during my master’s, and for being source of strength, support, patience, and motivation during this entire experience. Thank you for being the best life partner. ¡Te amo! v Table of Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ v List of figures ................................................................................................................................. vii List of tables .................................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Geological background ................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Literature review .............................................................................................................. 7 1.2.1 Plinian Eruptions ...................................................................................................... 8 1.2.2 The role of water in melting processes ............................................................. 17 1.2.3 Magmatic water at storage conditions .............................................................. 19 1.2.4 Water behavior during magma-ascent decompression .................................. 23 Chapter 2: Motivation .................................................................................................................. 29 2.1 Colombian perspective ................................................................................................ 32 2.2 Statement of purpose ................................................................................................... 34 2.2.1 Specific objectives ................................................................................................. 34 Chapter 3: Methods ..................................................................................................................... 35 3.1 Field work ....................................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Sample preparation ...................................................................................................... 36 3.3 Componentry and petrographic analysis ................................................................. 37 3.4 Whole rock geochemistry ............................................................................................ 38 3.5 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR): volatile concentrations ........ 38 3.6 Electron Probe Microanalyzer (EPMA): glass, melt inclusions and mineral chemistry ................................................................................................................................... 42 Chapter 4: Results ........................................................................................................................ 45 4.1 Stratigraphy: pyroclastic fall deposits ...................................................................... 45 4.2 Componentry and petrography .................................................................................. 51 4.3 Volatiles .......................................................................................................................... 55 4.4 Water in feldspar ........................................................................................................... 61 4.5 Plagioclase and amphibole geothermobarometry .................................................. 65 4.6 Whole rock chemistry .................................................................................................. 71 vi Chapter 5: Discussion ................................................................................................................. 75 5.1 Dynamics of main Plinian eruptions in CMV ........................................................... 75 5.2 Geothermobarometry ................................................................................................... 76 5.3 Evidence of a superhydrous magma ......................................................................... 78 5.4 Origin and evolution of CMV dacitic melts .............................................................. 80 5.5 Triggering mechanism for the largest Plinian eruption of CMV .......................... 86 5.6 Magma ascent history for the largest Plinian eruption of CMV ........................... 87 Chapter 6: Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 91 Appendixes .................................................................................................................................... 94 Appendix A: Locations map and stratigraphic columns ................................................. 95 Appendix B: Componentry analysis.................................................................................... 100 Appendix C: Petrography analysis ...................................................................................... 103 Appendix D: Whole rock geochemistry ............................................................................ 148 Appendix E: Volatile content in melt inclusions .............................................................. 149 Appendix F: Water content in feldspar .............................................................................. 156 Appendix G: Glass, melt inclusions and mineral chemistry of amphibole, plagioclase, olivine and orthopyroxene ................................................................................................... 176 Appendix H: Matlab code for water diffusion in plagioclase ...................................... 226 References ................................................................................................................................... 227 vii List of figures Figure 1. Location of Cerro Machin volcano, Colombia. A. Neotectonic map of Colombia with the main fault systems. B. Geological setting of Cerro Machin volcano delimited by Machin and Cajamarca faults. Geomorphological features are also shown, symbols taken from (Castilla et al., 2021). ............................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2. Digital elevation model of the outcrop locations (blue dots). Samples from location CMV-008 (represented by a yellow star in the map) were used for lab analysis. Isopachs are shown in black - thickness in cm – towns, streams and roads in grey. ....... 7 Figure 3. Spatial distribution of Plinian eruptions over the last 50 kyr. Color shows compositions while size of symbol represents VEI. Symbols with more than one color are representing the different compositions of multiple eruptions of the same VEI. Database taken from LaMEVE (Large Magnitude Explosive Volcanic Eruptions) of VOGRIPA project. ......................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4. Different regions of a typical Plinian-sub Plinian eruptive column (modified from Cioni et al., 2015). .............................................................................................................. 12 Figure 5. Frenkel defects in the NaCl structure. It occurs when an atom leaves its normal site vacant and instead occupies an interstitial site (Aschcroft & Mermin, 1976). ......... 23 Figure 6. Compilation of published water content in feldspar crystals by (Mosenfelder et al., 2020). ....................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 7. Geological context of active Colombian volcanoes. A. Map of Colombia with the different active volcanoes. B. Most tragic eruptions in Colombia, each bar represents one eruption from a specific volcano and the associated number of deaths. ........................ 33 Figure 8. Sketch of methodology for measuring water concentration in a plagioclase crystal by FTIR. A single plagioclase crystal is cut in half and the two halves are doubly polished. One half is polished to create a slab parallel to the cut face of the crystal and the other half is polished to create a slab perpendicular to the cut face. Green lines in each half show the different profiles taken by the FTIR on each half of the crystal. Red lines show the polarization direction at 0° and 90° of the IR beam. Note that this method allows us to make polarized FTIR measurements in three perpendicular directions through the crystal, which enables us to quantify the total concentration of dissolved water. X, Y and Z denote crystallographic axes, but it is important to note that water concentration can be quantified using light polarized in any three perpendicular directions (i.e., it is not necessary to perfectly align the slabs with the crystallographic axes). ............................................................................................................................................... 41 Figure 9. Proximal outcrops of the study eruption units - 3 km from the vent. A. Interbedding between clast-supported pyroclastic fall deposits and matrix-supported pyroclastic flows overlined by grey to brownish fine-ash cross-laminated pyroclastic flow deposits. Scale 20 cm. B. Occasional charcoal fragments in the matrix-supported pyroclastic flow deposits at the bottom of the sequence. C. Photograph of different eruptive units identified in medial areas. D. Close up of the selected unit P1 for following lab analysis. ................................................................................................................................... 46 viii Figure 10. Stratigraphic correlation of the marker horizon identified from proximal to distal areas. ................................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 11. Schematic stratigraphic column of location CMV-008. Medial areas outcrop - 13 km from the vent. ................................................................................................................... 50 Figure 12. Photographs of glassy particles under binocular microscope. A. white, fresh, highly vesiculated, coarse-grain, glassy particles with phenocryst of plagioclase, amphibole, biotite and quartz. B. gray, fresh, highly vesiculated, fine-grain glassy particles with crystals of plagioclase, quartz, amphibole and biotite. C. Banded particles combining white and gray textures. D. Fresh, dense, hypohyaline, porphyritic lithic fragments. E. Altered dense lithic fragments. F. Irregular fragments of the metamorphic basement in CMV. ........................................................................................................................ 52 Figure 13. Photomicrographs of the different regions identified in P1 pumice products. A. dense, holocrystalline, porphyritic lithic fragments with plagioclase-amphibole crystals in a crystalline matrix. B. Irregular metamorphic fragments from the basement of CMV. C. Moderate to highly vesiculated, medium-grained region. D. Highly vesiculated, fine-grained region. E. and F. Banded pumice between same regions. .............................. 53 Figure 14. Photomicrographs of the different textures identified in plagioclase (Pl), amphibole (Amp), quartz (Qz), biotite (Bt), olivine (Ol) crystals. The top left region of each panel is imaged in plane-polarized light, whereas the lower right region of each panel is imaged in cross-polarized light. A. Zoned and subhedral phenocryst of plagioclase and subhedral biotite microcrysts in a hypohyaline and vesiculated groundmass. B. Microcrystal of plagioclase with a reabsorbed rim and anhedral shape. C. Euhedral crystal of amphibole, fractured. D. Zoned and euhedral microcryst of amphibole with at least one rim. E. Anhedral microphenocryst of quartz with melt inclusions. Euhedral crystal of biotite also observed. F. Anhedral microphenocryst of olivine surrounded by a rim of amphibole. ............................................................................ 55 Figure 15. Volatiles in melt inclusions hosted in plagioclase and quartz crystals. A. Photomicrograph of conical-shaped melt inclusion hosted in quartz. B. H2O vs CO2 plot showing 36 melt inclusions hosted in plagioclase and quartz crystals. Also shown are calculated vapor saturation isobars (contours of constant pressure) and vapor isopleths (contours of constant vapor composition) for 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80% CO2, all calculated using VolatileCalc (Newman and Lowenstern, 2002). Closed system degassing paths with 0, 2, 5 and 10% of exsolved vapor also calculated using VolatileCalc are shown. Uncertainty for each melt inclusion H2O and CO2 value was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation (Newcombe, pers. communication, 2022): each parameter (absorbance, wafer thickness, density, absorption coefficient) was sampled 1000 times from a normal distribution (with a mean and standard deviation representative of the measured values) to produce H2O and CO2 concentrations. A representative standard deviation of the resultant H2O and CO2 distributions is plotted in the lower right corner of the plot. ... 57 Figure 16. Plots of volatile content in melt inclusions and matrix glasses. A. Comparison between water results from EPMA and FTIR analysis. B. Plot of volatile content versus SiO2 content in melt inclusions measured by EPMA, matrix glasses and melt inclusions measured by FTIR. ....................................................................................................................... 59 ix Figure 17. Plots of volatile content (F, S, Cl) versus water (A, C, E) and SiO2 (B, D, F).. ... 61 Figure 18. Water content in feldspar crystals. A. Polarized spectra from three perpendicular directions in a feldspar crystal. Similar shapes for each direction were obtained for oligoclase crystals (An10-30) by Johnson and Rossman (2013). B. Total water concentrations measured in three different feldspar crystals. Note that different crystals have different water contents, but the water contents of each crystal are approximately homogeneous from core to rim (See Appendix F for results from 17 feldspar crystals). ......................................................................................................................... 62 Figure 19. Diffusion model of feldspar crystal with no zoning in water (see Matlab results in Appendix H). Red lines indicate different magma ascent times to illustrate how profiles should be for each scenario. ....................................................................................... 65 Figure 20. Thermometry plots applying different methodologies. A. Anorthite content vs temperature plot calculated using the plagioclase-melt thermometer of Putirka et al. (2008). B. Magnesium number vs temperature calculated using the amphibole-melt thermometer of Molina et al. (2015). ....................................................................................... 66 Figure 21. Thermobarometry plots applying different methodologies (see results in Appendix G, Table J). Grey regions represent seismicity from 2008-2015 (Londoño, 2016) as well as the depths recorded by a CO2 isotope study (Inguaggiato et al., 2017). A. Amphibole thermobarometer of Ridolfi (2021). B. Amphibole thermobarometer of Higgins et al. (2022). C. Amphibole-melt thermobarometer of Putirka (2016). D. Water content vs saturation pressure plot for 36 melt inclusions. Solubility curves were calculated with VolatileCalc (Newman and Lowenstern, 2006) for the minimum and maximum temperatures recorded by amphibole crystals, both curves are shown to illustrate best-fit to high water melt inclusions. ................................................................... 67 Figure 22. Whole-rock geochemical plots of the analyzed samples (whole rock chemistry from this study: orange triangles, melt inclusions and glass from this study: light orange circles and orange circles, respectively). For comparison CMV data available in the literature are also plotted (whole rock chemistry: gray triangles, glass: gray circles) (Laeger et al., 2013; Régnier et al., 2015). A.Total Alkalis vs. Silica (TAS) diagram (after Le Bas et al., 1986); (B-J) variation diagrams of the main major oxides. Arrows indicate samples tendencies...................................................................................................................... 72 Figure 23. Whole-rock geochemical plots of the analyzed samples (whole rock chemistry: orange triangles). For comparison CMV data available in the literature are also plotted (whole rock chemistry: gray circles). (Laeger et al., 2013; Régnier et al., 2015). (A-L) variation diagrams of the trace elements with respect to SiO2. Arrows indicate tendencies for samples collected in this sutdy. ......................................................................................... 73 Figure 24. Multielement diagram normalized to primitive mantle (Sun & McDonough, 1989). Whole-rock geochemical CMV samples are orange triangles. For comparison CMV data available in the literature are also plotted (gray circles). (Laeger et al., 2013; Régnier et al., 2015) .................................................................................................................................... 74 Figure 25. Discrimination diagrams for adakites. Adakite fields are from Defant and Drummond (1990) High-silica adakite and Low-silica adakite fields are from Martin et al. x (2005) and Ribeiro et al. (2016). A. Sr/Y versus Y. B. Sr versus SiO2. C. Cr/Ni versus TiO2 which discriminates high-silica adakites (HSA) from low-silica adakites (LSA). .............. 74 Figure 26. Experimental constraints for deep pressures in Cerro Machin. A. Phase diagram taken from Krawczynski et al. (2012) to show the T-P conditions for amphibole and olivine coexistence. B. Microphotograph of high-Fo olivine microphenocryst with a overgrowth rim of amphibole (Mg# 80) and microphenocryst of amphibole in CMV dacite. ............................................................................................................................................. 79 Figure 27. Comparison of total H2O in melt from melt inclusions data and plagioclase hygrometer using a partition coefficient of 0.002 (Caseres et al., 2018) and a partition coefficient of 0.004. Both values agree with melt inclusions water contents. ................. 80 Figure 28. Composition of olivine microphenocrysts and whole rock chemistry in CMV dacites. A. Ni/(Mg/Fe)/1000 versus 100xMn/Fe in olivine crystals. The fields for pyroxenite and peridotite are from Sobolev et al. (2007). B. Ni versus Fo content in CMV olivines. Blue fields correspond to olivines from 1963-65 Irazu eruption in Straub et al., (2011) and in Ruprecht and Plank (2013). Green and red fields are olivines in equilibrium with peridotite and pyroxenite source compositions (taken from Ruprecht and Plank, 2013). C. Whole-rock and olivine FeO/MgO for CMV dacites. Dashed lines are olivine and whole-rock compositions predicted to be at equilibrium based on Fe–Mg exchange coefficients (Kd’s) of 0.30 (Kd = [FeO*/MgOolivine]/[FeO/MgOmelt]) from Roeder & Emslie (1970). D. Rhode’s diagram to illustrate processes that result in deviations from equilibrium, as shown by arrows. ............................................................................................. 83 Figure 29. Samples display the distinctive geochemical features of adakite A. Ba/Nb vs. Nb diagram (Bourdon et al., 2002) support the role of slab fluids in adakite genesis. B. Th/La versus Th/Nb (Chiaradia, 2009) supports an Altered oceanic crust (AOC) fluid input from the slab. Compositions from N-MORB, E-MORB and OIB after Sun and McDonough (1989). C. Rb/Y versus Nb/Y (Wang et al., 2008) supports an adakite signature from fluid related enrichment. D. Ni versus Cr diagram compare subduction- related adakite with lower crust-derived adakites (fields shown of Guan et al., 2012) . 84 Figure 30. Histograms showing abundance of different textures of A. amphibole and B. plagioclase. .................................................................................................................................... 87 Figure 31. A. Summary of the different pressures and depth recorded by amphibole crystals, melt inclusions, partition coefficient of water in plagioclase. ............................ 90 xi List of tables Table 1. Plagioclase parameters published in the literature. The absorbance coefficient (I) determines how far light of a particular wavelength can penetrate into a material before it is absorbed. Diffusion parameter refers to Do is the maximal diffusion coefficient at infinite temperature in m2/s; Ea is the activation energy for diffusion in kJ/mol and D is the diffusion coefficient value which refers to the amount of a particular substance that diffuses across a unit area in 1 s under the influence of a gradient of one unit. ................................................................................................................................................. 22 Table 2. Magma ascent range covered by each tool used in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are also listed as well as the conduit process evidenced by each approach. ........................................................................................................................ 26 Table 3. Summary of melt inclusions data. Saturation pressures calculated by different methodologies are also presented. ........................................................................................... 58 Table 4. Water in feldspars summary. Only average from each profile is shown. ......... 63 Table 5. Summary of T, P conditions calculated using Higgins et al. (2022), Ridolfi (2021) (temperature ± 22°C, pressure ±12% MPa ) and Putirka (2016) (temperature ± 30°C, pressure ±200MPa) geothermobarometers. ............................................................................ 70 1 Chapter 1: Introduction Volcanic eruptions are one of the most impactful geologic events on our planet, in fact, during the last century, hundreds of minor eruptions occurred across the globe (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2017). Twelve were large enough to cause economic and social consequences. Some of these eruptions were explosive, violent and their impact was propagated to further distances from the volcano (e.g. Hunga Tonga volcano, January 2022). In contrast, others were effusive, gentler but still destroyed and affected thousands of people (e.g. La Palma eruption, 2021). Despite the variability of eruptive styles, all eruptions are governed by a set of physical and chemical processes that respond to the magmatic conditions at which these processes occur (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2017). Understanding what controls volcanoes’ behavior requires investigation of the melt generation process in the subduction zone, the storage conditions of magma reservoirs, the magma compositional evolution in the crust and the magma ascent history from source to surface. In each of these stages, water plays a significant role influencing the magmatic evolution of the system (Gill, 1981; Plank et al., 2013; Sisson and Grove, 1993). Arc magmas are the consequence of mantle melting produced by H2O-rich fluids derived from the slab at subduction zones. The presence of H2O lowers the solidus temperature of the mantle promoting the ascent of hydrous melts by reactive porous flow in the core of the mantle wedge to the shallow mantle lithosphere where they stall and fractionate into high SiO2 melts (Annen et al., 2006; Bryant et al., 2011; Collins et al., 2020; Grove et al. 2003; Krawczynski et al., 2012; Prouteau & Scaillet, 2003). The amount of water involved in these processes is still unknown but estimates up to 10 wt.% have been reported on the basis of comparison studies between mineral stability with experimental 2 products and thermodynamic calculations (Carmichael, 2002, 2004; Grove et al., 2003; McCanta et al., 2007). At the same time, water has a significant effect on fractional crystallization and differentiation paths by controlling the mineral phase stability at any storage condition (P-T). Thus, crystals and melt inclusions – small drops of melt trapped inside crystallizing mineral phases – constitute a valuable source of evidence for the active processes happening in the storage zone and the initial conditions for eruption (e.g. Crabtree & Lange, 2011; Blatter & Carmichael, 1998, 2001; Pichavant et al., 2002; Moore et al., 1998; Rutherford et al., 1985; Rutherford & Devine, 1988; Scaillet & Evans, 1999;). Likewise, the role of water has been reported as the driving force for magma to ascend and erupt (Cashman, 2004; Edmonds, 2008; Edmonds & Wallace, 2017; Sparks, 2003; Wallace, 2005; Wallace & Anderson, 2000). However, eruptive style seems to be less influenced by the initial dissolved volatile content and more controlled by the efficiency of volatile exsolution and degassing style, both of which are controlled by magma decompression and ascent rate (Barth et al., 2019; Cassidy et al., 2018). In basaltic systems, magma decompression rate seems to correlate with eruption magnitude (Moussallam et al., 2019) likely due to the influence of magma decompression rate on melt-vapor segregation in the conduit. However, few studies have been developed in dacitic-rhyolitic systems in which no such correlation is observed (Moussallam et al., 2019). In this study, a petrological investigation of the largest known eruption of Cerro Machin volcano in Colombia is presented. Interpretations of melt generation in the subduction zone, storage conditions prior to the eruption, triggering mechanisms and degassing and ascent history are discussed based on major elements and trace element chemistry, 3 mineral and mineral-liquid geothermobarometry, volatile content in melt inclusions and nominally anhydrous minerals and volatile diffusion modelling in feldspar crystals. Cerro Machin volcano is continuously monitored by the Colombian Geological Survey (Servicio Geológico Colombiano SGC in Spanish) who reported from 2007 to 2015 an increase in the seismic activity, recording a maximum peak of 9000 volcano-tectonic (VT) events in 2010 (Londoño et al., 2011), 6500 VT in 2011 and 2000 VT in 2012. Two VT earthquakes on the 7th of October 2012 reached magnitudes of 4.7 and 4.1 (Londoño et al., 2011). Combined with seismic studies, petrological constraints are a powerful tool for understanding magma dynamics, eruption triggering processes and magma ascent histories. Geophysics and petrology studies provide meaningful information for the correct interpretation of changes detected by monitoring the magmatic system and possible onset of magma ascent (Bräuer et al., 2005; Londoño, 2016). These parameters comprise invaluable information for hazard assessment studies and represent the input data for modeling work. Studies have demonstrated that explosive eruptions (Volcanic Explosivity Index or VEI > 2) are a latent hazard for communities living close to volcanoes with an explosive history (Saucedo et al., 2005). In case of eruption, Cerro Machin volcano could affect several main cities of Colombia such as Armenia (295,208 inhabitants), Ibague (529,635 inhabitants) and Cajamarca (17,309 inhabitants) as well as impact important transport connections between the capital of Colombia – Bogota, and the southern part of the country (Méndez et al., 2002a, 2002b; Murcia et al., 2008). Therefore, understanding the dynamics of Cerro Machin’s magmatic system is essential for developing effective strategies that could save thousands of people and let the government prepare when an eruption occurs. 4 1.1 Geological background Cerro Machin volcano (CMV) is located in the northern segment of the Central Cordillera of Colombia (lat 4⁰29’N; long 75⁰23’W; 2750 m.a.s.l.), as the result of the subduction of Nazca Plate beneath the South American Plate in an east-west direction (Figure 1A) with a velocity of 46 mm/yr and a slab dip of 38 (Hayes et al., 2018, Ha et al., 2020). In the Colombia-Ecuador subduction zone, the age reported at the subducted plate trench is 16 Myr, the thickness of the overriding plate is 40 km (Hayes et al., 2018) and the locus of the slab surface below the arc is reported at a depth of 110 km (Wada & Wang, 2009) Along with eight other volcanoes – including Nevado del Ruiz volcano, well known for the Armero tragedy - Cerro Machin belongs to the Cerro Bravo-Cerro Machín volcanic complex. Its edifice is emplaced at the intersection between two major faults, the Cajamarca fault which represent a strike-slip fault with vertical displacement and the Machín fault interpreted as a normal fault with dextral-lateral displacement (Mosquera et al., 1982; Murcia et al., 2008; Rueda, 2005) (Figure 1B). Cerro Machin basement comprises the Cajamarca metamorphic complex (Maya & González, 1995; Núñez et al., 1980) primarily named as the Cajamarca Group by Nelson (1959). It includes para- and orthogneisses, phyllites, quartzites, greenschists, graphitic schists and locally marbles (Vargas et al., 2005; Villagómez & Spikings, 2013) affected by a low to moderate regional metamorphism – greenschist to amphibolite facies (Cediel & Shaw, 2003). The Cajamarca Complex has been described as a Triassic sequence intruded by hypabyssal igneous bodies (Ibagué Batholith) with a K/Ar hornblende and biotite ages of 150-140 Ma (Brook, 1984; Vesga & Barrero, 1978; Villagómez et al., 2011). 5 Figure 1. Location of Cerro Machin volcano, Colombia. A. Neotectonic map of Colombia with the main fault systems. B. Geological setting of Cerro Machin volcano delimited by Machin and Cajamarca faults. Geomorphological features are also shown, symbols taken from (Castilla et al., 2021). The volcanic edifice is 2750 m of altitude above sea level with a diameter of 2.4 km and it has been classified as a pyroclastic ring complex with a dacitic intra-crater lava-dome complex (Arango Palacio, 2012; Cepeda et al., 1995). The volcanic sequence comprises at least six major events with ages of >5000, 4500, 3600, 2500, 1200 and 900 yr BP, as determined by carbon dating (Cepeda et al., 1995; Méndez et al., 2002a; Rueda, 2005). The volcaniclastic deposits from the 5000 yr BP event were named “El Espartillal” by Cepeda et al. (1996) and constitute concentrated and diluted pyroclastic density currents (PDC) up to 40 m thick. This event was dated in burnt material found in a PDC 10 km far from the vent (Méndez et al., 2002b). The second period of activity occurred at 4800- 4300 yr BP, named P0 by Rueda (2005). This section of the deposit is interpreted to have been produced by a Plinian eruption with a calculated plume height of 29 km (Rueda, 2005). The third and most explosive event occurred at 3600 yr BP (called P1 by Rueda, 2005), and involved a beginning phase of dome disruption followed by an open-conduit 6 event. The pyroclastic fall deposits related to this event reached up to 60 km from the vent (Méndez et al., 2002b; Rueda, 2005). Consequently, several lahars took place along the Coello River. The following eruptive episodes (2500 and 1200 yr BP - also named Guaico and P2, respectively by Rueda (2005) comprised multiple dome collapse events resulting in block and ash deposits that traveled up to 35 km from the vent. The last event occurred at 900 yr BP, also called El Anillo, and led to the emplacement of the lava-dome complex occupying the center of the volcanic edifice (Méndez et al., 2002b; Rueda, 2005). Each episode was associated with considerable lahar events that traveled more than 100 km from the vent. This contribution focuses on the most spread deposits of CMV described up to 40 km away from the vent (Figure 2). According to previous studies (Méndez et al., 2002a; Rueda, 2005), such deposits correspond to the 3600 yr BP eruption or P1 event. Although no historical eruptions have been reported for CMV, archeological studies have suggested that indigenous communities were strongly affected by the 5100 and 3600 yr BP eruptions (Méndez, 1999). Seismic activity in the Cerro Bravo-Cerro Machín Volcanic Complex was reported by the Colombian Geological Survey from 2007 to 2015 (Londoño, 2016) consistent with an active magmatic system with a high probability of new unrest or an increase in volcanic activity. Since 2021, CMV activity level remains in III (yellow color) which means ‘changes in the volcanic activity in this case related to seismic events and fumarolic activity’ (Colombian Geological Service webpage, 2022). 7 Figure 2. Digital elevation model of the outcrop locations (blue dots). Samples from location CMV-008 (represented by a yellow star in the map) were used for lab analysis. Isopachs are shown in black - thickness in cm – towns, streams and roads in grey. 1.2 Literature review The scientific eagerness to communicate the processes occurring within volcanoes has promoted the invention of different terminologies, classifications and definitions that seeks to describe accurately volcanic behavior observations (Lockwood & Hazlett, 2010). Multiple approaches made in the past century have resulted in different classifications based on eruptive style, volume and composition of the erupted material (Gèze, 1964; Self & Sparks, 1978; Wood, 1980). Now, eruptions are most frequently described by the Walker (1973) classification system – Hawaiian, Strombolian, Vulcanian, Surtseyan, SubPlinian, Plinian - as well as by its Volcanic Explosivity Index (or VEI). The latter 8 proposed by Newhall & Self (1982) correlates the volume of material ejected, eruption column height and eruption duration scaling from 0 or non-explosive to 10 or very explosive. This section comprises the literature background for the main topics discussed in this study. A detailed description of the most common eruption style reported in Cerro Machin volcano, along with a description of the typical associated deposits is presented. Moreover, a comprehensive summary of the physical and chemical processes that occur from the mantle source in subduction zones to the surface are discussed for a better understanding of the current document. 1.2.1 Plinian Eruptions Plinian eruptions, named after Pliny the Younger for his accounting of the 79AD Vesuvius eruption, represent the most explosive end-member of volcanic eruptions (VEI: 4-8). Commonly, they are associated with volatile-rich, highly viscous magmas that experience high speed discharge forming vertical columns of several tens of kilometers of height (Sigurdsson, 2000; Sigurdsson et al., 2015; Sparks, 1986; Sparks & Wilson, 1976; Walker, 1973, 1981; Wilson, 1976, 1980; Wilson et al., 1978). Some of the most documented andesitic-dacitic Plinian eruptions are the 1980 Mt. St. Helens event in the United States (e.g. Carey et al., 1995; Cashman & Blundy, 2000; Cashman & Hoblitt, 2004) and the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubo (e.g. Hammer et al., 1999; Koyaguchi & Tokuno, 1993; Polacci et al., 2001). Examples from the 20th century that include basaltic Plinian eruptions are: The 1902 eruption of Santa Maria volcano, Guatemala (Andrews, 2014; Rose, 1972; Williams & Self, 1983), the 1932 eruption, Quizapu volcano in Chile (Ruprecht & Bachmann, 2010), the 1783 eruption of Asama volcano, Central Japan (Yasui & Koyaguchi, 2004), the 1875 eruption of Askja volcano, Iceland (Carey et al., 2010; Thorarinsson & Sigvaldason, 1962), the 2008 eruption of Chaiten volcano in Chile (Alfano et al., 2011, 2012) and the 1912 eruption of Novarupta volcano (Fierstein & 9 Hildreth, 1992; Hildreth & Fierstein, 2012) in Alaska. Other well characterized Plinian eruptions include: the 7700 yr BP eruption, Mt. Mazama, United States (Klug et al., 2002; Suzuki‐Kamata et al., 1993; Young, 1990), the 800 yr BP eruption of Quilotoa volcano in Ecuador (Mothes & Hall, 2008; Rosi et al., 2004), the 10.5 ka BP eruption of Nevado de Toluca volcano in Mexico (Arce et al., 2003), the ~14.1 ka BP Tutti Frutti (Siebe et al., 2017; Sosa-Ceballos et al., 2014) and the ~5 ka BP “Ochre Pumice” (Arana-Salinas et al., 2010) eruptions of Popocatépetl volcano in Mexico, the 1.8 ka BP eruption of Taupo volcano (Talbot et al., 1994; Wilson, 1985) (Figure 3). 10 Figure 3. Spatial distribution of Plinian eruptions over the last 50 kyr. Color shows compositions while size of symbol represents VEI. Symbols with more than one color are representing the different compositions of multiple eruptions of the same VEI. Database taken from LaMEVE (Large Magnitude Explosive Volcanic Eruptions) of VOGRIPA project. 11 Dynamics controlling Plinian eruptions include magma composition, rheology, volatile content and conduit geometry (Fisher & Schmincke, 1984; Papale et al., 1998; Sigurdsson, 2000). Although they have been defined as a sustained phase, Plinian eruptions typically consist in a complex time-evolution of eruption dynamics consisting of a succession of phases, sometimes including different eruptive styles (Cioni et al., 2015). In fact, many Plinian eruptions begin with vulcanian style phases, also called open-phases or vent- clearing phases, where the older material is ejected preceding the larger magmatic eruption (Lockwood & Hazlett, 2010). Eruptive columns associated with the climax of the eruption can be described in three different regions. A lower part is called the gas- thrust region in which the material is carried upwards by its momentum (Sparks & Wilson, 1976). The eruptive jet occurs as a result of incorporated air that expands due to heating from the hot pyroclasts and eventually gains a positive buoyancy with respect to the ambient atmosphere (Woods, 1988). Above the gas-thrust region, the column behaves as a buoyancy-driven convective plume where the thermal energy causes the column to continue rising until it reaches the neutral buoyancy height. The ejected material is finally propagated laterally from the umbrella region by winds (Figure 4) (Cioni et al., 2015). Columns formed by magmas with high volatile content >5 wt.% water are likely to show convective motion, whereas those with low volatile content <1 wt.% water tend to form collapsing columns (Cas & Wright, 1987). For magmas with intermediate content of volatiles, collapse occurs when the vent radius exceeds a certain value defined by Wilson (1976). 12 Figure 4. Different regions of a typical Plinian-sub Plinian eruptive column (modified from Cioni et al., 2015). During Plinian eruptions large volumes of material are ejected forming widespread wind- controlled fall deposits (Cas & Wright, 1987) that can be used as marker horizons for tephrochronology (Lowe et al., 2008; Thorarinsson, 1981; Walker, 1981). In addition, tephra deposits can reflect the complex variability of the eruptive regimes and the multiple pulses that occurred during the eruption. This enables the reconstruction of the plume dynamics (Cioni et al., 2003) and the assessment of eruptive parameters such as volume, mass discharge rate and column height (Carey & Sparks, 1986; Pyle, 1989). 1.2.1.1 Associated deposits Plinian deposits cover a dispersal area greater than 1000 km2 inside the 0.01 Tmax isopach, where Tmax is the maximum thickness of the deposit (Walker, 1973). The study of these has demonstrated to be a valuable source for calculations of volume, mass discharge rate, column height, wind velocities, eruption intensity and magnitude (Fierstein & 13 Nathenson, 1992; Pyle, 1989). This is how several models of grain size distribution and dispersal patterns have been developed in the literature deposits (Carey & Sparks, 1986; Settle, 1978; Walker, 1981; Wilson et al., 1978; Wilson & Walker, 1987). The systematic variations with distance from the vent of parameters such as thickness and grain size follow a simple exponential decay law -or power law- and are controlled by plume dynamics and wind field at the time of the eruption (Bonadonna & Costa, 2012; Bonadonna & Houghton, 2005; Pyle, 1989). For instance, the deposition of large clasts that follow ballistic trajectories in proximal areas yield important information about exit velocities and explosion pressures in the gas-thrust region (Wilson, 1976; Wilson et al., 1978). On the other hand, finer fragments can provide information about the column height and eruption intensity since these fragments are transported laterally in the umbrella region and are subsequently accumulated in distal areas based on their terminal fall velocity (Carey & Sparks, 1986; Wilson, 1980; Wilson et al., 1978). Proximal deposits In proximal areas (5-10 km from the vent), deposits result from the rapid accumulation from the gas-thrust regions and from the margins of the convective column. They can present certain complexities such as 1) recycling of clasts falling from the umbrella region into the rising column, 2) erosion or overthickening of proximal fall deposits by pyroclastic density currents or PDCs, 3) simultaneous deposition of material from different regions of the eruption column, 4) poor preservation of the deposits due to the steepness of the volcano edifice or collapse of the volcanic edifice, 6) interbedding between PDCs separate fall units (Cas & Wright, 1987; Cioni et al., 2015; Self et al., 1984). 14 Medial deposits Depending on the size of the eruption, medial deposits can cover up to 40-50 km. They are well preserved and represent the typical pyroclastic fall sequence of lapilli layers. Based on their internal configurations, they provide information about changes in magma discharge, column height and eruptive column steadiness (Adams et al., 2006; Alfano et al., 2011; Carey et al., 1995; Cole et al., 1995; Jurado-Chichay & Walker, 2001; Taddeucci & Wohletz, 2001). Massive, normal or reversely graded deposits are the result of steady eruptive columns (Houghton & Carey, 2015; Williams & Self, 1983) with changes in mass discharge rate (MDR). They are classified as: Simple Plinian deposits (Rosi, 1996) in which multiple- graded layers are the result of the gradual variation of the column height. On the other hand, under column instability, it is common to observe internal bedded layers within the sequence these deposits are categorized as Simple-stratified Plinian deposits by Rosi (1996). Occasional partial column collapses can result in transitions between convective and collapsing phases (i.e. interlaying between ash fallout deposits and PDCs) (Self et al., 1984). PDCs can be absent within the depositional sequence but represented by fine- grain size layers which represent the co-PDC ash dominated by a turbulence regime (Brown & Andrews, 2015). It is important to notice that compositional vertical changes do not vary with distance and help to correlate among different outcrops (Cioni et al., 2015). Distal deposits Distal deposits cover from 50 km up to several hundreds of km from the vent. They are represented by very fine-grain size deposits and are very poorly preserved in the 15 geological record. This means that only recent eruptions contain a complete description for these deposits (Sigurdsson, 2000). SubPlinian deposits SubPlinian eruptions are characterized by lower intensity and unsteadiness in magma discharge which result in strongly oscillatory eruptive columns (Bursik, 1993; Self, 1976; Sieh & Bursik, 1986). Therefore, the associated pyroclastic fall deposits show a strong stratification (Cioni et al., 2003). In contrast to Plinian eruption deposits, they tend to be thinner and to show greater variability in the juvenile component. Componentry The most common attribute of Plinian eruption deposits is the presence of juvenile highly vesiculated material (i.e. pumice or scoria) (Fisher & Schmincke, 1984). However, accessory and accidental lithics derived from the conduit wall can also be present (Cas & Wright, 1987; Németh & Martin, 2007). A certain number of eruptions show evidence of compositional zoning or juvenile material represented by streaky mixed pumice clasts suggesting mechanical mixing before the eruption (Martí et al., 2010; Sparks et al., 1981). Componentry vertical variations are evidence of changes in the vent such as widening of the conduit (i.e. promoting erosion rate and therefore increasing the proportion of accessory lithics), changes in the position of the fragmentation level (i.e. changes in accidental lithic composition) or sampling different parts of the magma chamber. Magma fragmentation mechanisms As magma rises from depth, the decrease in pressure causes volatiles to exsolve by nucleation of new bubbles and to grow due to diffusion into the existing bubbles (Cas & Wright, 1987; Gonnermann, 2015; Gonnermann & Manga, 2007). The process in which 16 the continuous molten phase with disperse bubbles breaks into a gas phase with dispersed magma fragments is called fragmentation (Cashman & Scheu, 2015; Gonnermann, 2015). Fragmentation of magma can occur by two different mechanisms that can be interpreted based on the abundance and shapes of the juvenile ash particles in the deposits (Heiken, 1972, Wohletz & Krinsley, 1982, Dellino et al., 2001). Magmatic fragmentation mechanism is driven by the exsolution and expansion of gases originally dissolved in the molten phase (Blake, 1984; Jellinek & DePaolo, 2003; McLeod & Tait, 1999). In this case, fragmentation can occur by rapid acceleration of magma to the surface due to overpressure within the magma chamber. This overpressure can be the result of new and hot magma input or because of volatile enrichment induced by cooling and crystallization processes (Cas & Wright, 1987; Wallace, 2001). Rapid decompression caused by collapse of the edifice or lava domes can also represent a potential fragmentation trigger (Gonnermann & Manga, 2007; Lipman & Mullineaux, 1981). Deposits from magmatic eruptions tend to be rich in juvenile material (Cas & Wright, 1987). Phreatomagmatic mechanism is generated by the physical interaction between the rising magma and external water (Wohletz, 1983). The contact between these two phases creates a vapor-film that expands and collapse promoting the melt fragmentation (Lorenz, 1985, 1987; Sheridan & Wohletz, 1981, 1983; Wohletz & Sheridan, 1983). The continuous energy and heating transfer facilitate the formation of a new vapor-film which generates an effective chain-reaction (Németh & Martin, 2007; Wohletz et al., 2013; Zimanowski et al., 2015). When magma heats surrounding fluids without any direct contact, it is called phreatic or hydrothermal fragmentation (Cas & Wright, 1987; Sigurdsson et al., 2015). Dense lithic fragments tend to be dominant in the associated deposits (Cas & Wright, 1987). 17 1.2.2 The role of water in melting processes The generally accepted model for melt generation in subduction zones involves partial melting in the mantle wedge by the addition of hydrous fluids released from the subducted slab (e.g. Annen et al., 2006; Davies & Stevenson, 1992; Forneris & Holloway, 2003; Grove et al., 2002; Schmidt & Poli, 1998; Ulmer, 2001). Experimental studies and numerical modeling suggest that primary melt compositions range from basalt to high magnesium andesite (Conrey et al., 1997; Grove et al., 2002) depending on the amount of magmatic water involved in the melting process (Grove et al., 2012). On the other hand, silica-rich counterparts have been explained by: a) partial melting of harzburgite in the mantle by water released from the subducted slab (Carmichael, 2004; Parman & Grove, 2004), b) crystallization of mantle-derived basaltic or basaltic andesitic melts at shallow crustal pressures (Sisson & Grove, 1993), c) crystallization of mantle-derived basaltic or basaltic andesitic melts at high pressures close to the Moho boundary (Prouteau & Scaillet, 2003), d) partial melting of metabasalts in the lower-middle crust promoted by intrusions of hot mantle derived magmas (Rushmer 1991; Sen & Dunn 1994; Rapp & Watson 1995; Petford & Atherton, 1996) and e) mixing between mafic and silicic magmas – including assimilation of silicic crustal rocks (Grove & Kinzler 1986; Hildreth & Moorbath, 1988). The adakite term was introduced in the literature by Defant & Drummond (1990) to describe melts produced by melting young subducted oceanic slab (< 25Myr) – hot oceanic crust (Kay, 1978). The rock is characterized by high Al2O3 (>15 wt %), high Sr/Y (>40), Sr (>400 ppm), low-Y (<18 ppm), Yb <1.9 ppm, La/Yb > 20, and a lack of Eu anomalies (Castillo, 2006, 2012; Defant & Drummond, 1990). However, the source of adakite signature in magmas has been highly debated as they can result from multiple models besides the initially proposed slab melting environment (Castillo et al., 2006 and 18 references therein). Some occurrences of adakites in cold subduction settings have been explained by melting of thickened mafic lower crust or crystal fractionation of wet basaltic arc magmas (Atherton & Petford, 1993; Castillo, 2006; Macpherson et al., 2006; Prouteau & Scaillet, 2003; Ribeiro et al., 2016; Rodriguez et al., 2007; Sajona et al., 1993; Yogodzinski & Kelemen, 1998). This topic is still controversial and remains in discussion. The presence of high amounts of water (> 10 wt.%) in the mantle wedge has been suggested as the controlling factor to generate SiO2-rich primitive arc magmas (57-60 wt.% SiO2) (Grove et al., 2003; Grove et al., 2012). Water is capable of lowering the mantle liquidus temperature, which increases the mineral-melt partition coefficient D for MgO as the temperature of the silicate liquid drops. In contrast, D for SiO2 remains invariant, favoring the SiO2 enrichment of water-rich mantle peridotite melts. These water-rich melts are in equilibrium with the mantle residue before ascending into the overlying crust where they undergo fractional crystallization at water-saturated conditions. During cooling and crystallization, magmas produce an aqueous phase which infiltrates the surrounding crust and promotes crustal melting in the base of the arc crust (Collins et al., 2020). Although the presence of primitive superhydrous melts (>8 wt. H2O) beneath some arcs has been inferred on the basis of volatile measurements in lower-crustal cumulates (Urann et al., 2022) and mafic enclaves (Goltz et al., 2020), experimental phase equilibria studies (Camichael et al., 2002; Conrad et al., 1988; Grove et al., 2005; Krawczynski et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2015; McCanta et al., 2007; Prouteau & Scaillet, 2003), mineral barometry coupled with water saturation pressures, and microprobe measurements in melt inclusions (Grove et al., 2003), the maximum amount of dissolved water remains unknown. Volatile concentration measurements in melt inclusions persist as the main 19 tool to explore water abundance in primary arc magmas, but another promising technique come from the analysis of water in nominally anhydrous minerals (Urann et al., 2020). 1.2.3 Magmatic water at storage conditions 1.2.3.1 Volatile concentration in melt inclusions Melt inclusions are defined as tiny samples of undegassed melt trapped inside of phenocrysts (Wallace, 2005). They record significant information about the geochemical cycles of the major volatiles (H, C, S and Cl) before eruptions as they are physically isolated from external processes. Over the last few decades, a great set of studies have determined H2O and CO2 contents in melt inclusions of subduction-related magmas (Lowenstern, 1995; Lowenstern, 2003; Rose-Koga et al., 2021, and references therein). Water and CO2 concentrations in melt inclusions can reflect magma degassing history through the crust recording the entrapment pressures and tracking the volatile saturation evolution of magmas (Atlas et al., 2006; Bali et al., 2018; Hartley et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2008; Rust et al., 2004; Spilliaert et al., 2006). It is important to notice that post-entrapment processes such as crystallization or diffusive exchange can modify the composition of melt inclusions after they are trapped in the crystal host (Bucholz et al., 2013; Danyushevsky et al., 2000; Gaetani & Watson, 2002; Wallace, 2005). In addition, thermal contraction can result in the formation of vapor bubbles that deplete the melt in CO2 due to its low solubility (Anderson & Brown, 1993; Cervantes et al., 2002). 1.2.3.2 Water in Nominally Anhydrous Minerals Nominally Anhydrous Minerals or NAM refer to those minerals whose chemical formula can be written without any hydrogen, but they contain trace to minor amounts of 20 hydrous components (Bell & Rossman, 1992; Keppler & Smyth, 2006; Solomon & Rossman, 1988). Hydrogen is incorporated as defects in NAMs and it can be studied by diffraction methods and spectroscopic methods (IR and Raman spectroscopy). The latter relies on the idea of molecular bond vibration in which O-H vibrations and their absorption bands are easily assigned in the high energy part of the spectrum between 3000-4000 cm-1 (Libowitzky & Beran, 2006). NAMs have been considered as a promising approach to estimate H2O contents of arc magmas (Urann et al., 2022). Recent studies have suggested the presence of superhydrous magmas at depth (> 8 wt.% H2O) (Goltz et al., 2020; Krawczynski et al., 2012; Laumonier et al., 2017) which have not been recorded by melt inclusion measurements due to re-equilibration processes (Plank et al., 2013) or quenchability limitations (Gavrilenko et al., 2019). Using experimental water partition coefficients, NAMs can be used as potential hygrometers to estimate water contents in the host magmas (Urann et al., 2022) when water diffusion has not taken place. Similarly, NAMs have been proposed as potential chronometers from processes happening in a relative short-time window before the eruption. As magmas degas and ascend to the surface, the solubility of water decreases resulting in water loss through the crystals by diffusion. Assuming a degassed magma, NAMs are expected to contain water concentration gradients from core to rim that can be used to calculate syn-eruptive magma decompression and ascent rates (Demouchy et al., 2006; Newcombe et al., 2020; Peslier et al., 2015; Peslier & Luhr, 2006). This approach has been successfully applied in olivine crystals, a common phase present in basaltic and intermediate systems. However, this mineral phase is exceptionally rare in dacitic-rhyolitic systems which makes it valuable to test other mineral phases such as plagioclase and quartz as potential chronometers for silica-rich systems. 21 H in feldspars Volcanic feldspars contain OH as the structurally incorporated hydrous species (Johnson & Rossman, 2004). Pioneering studies of water concentration in feldspar using FTIR (Johnson & Rossman, 2003) indicate that for quantitative H concentration determinations, it is necessary to measure the total integrated absorbance in three mutually perpendicular polarized IR spectra. In order to calculate H concentrations, the Beer-Lambert law is applied in which the absorbance coefficient has been reported and updated by different authors (Table 1). Reported concentrations of water in feldspar are up to hundreds of wt. ppm H2O (Caseres et al., 2018; Hamada et al., 2011; Johnson & Rossman, 2004; Seaman et al., 2006) and have been used to constrain water content in their host melts (Caseres et al., 2017, 2018; Hamada et al., 2013). Available partition coefficient values between plagioclase and melts comes from experimental studies 0.0025 – for melts with > 3 wt% - to 0.005 - for melts with < 3 wt% (Hamada et al., 2013; Mosenfelder et al., 2015). In dacitic-rhyolitic systems such as Mt. Saint Helens (Johnson, 2005), Mt. Hood (Caseres et al., 2018), Mt. Mazama (Mosenfelder et al., 2018) and Huckleberry Ridge Tuff, Yellowstone (Rappoccio et al., 2020) a partition coefficient of 0.002 was estimated. The solubility of water in volcanic feldspar at different temperatures and oxygen fugacity has been explored in a wide range of compositions (Mosenfelder et al., 2020; Yang, 2012). Reported results from experimental studies show how solubility of water has a strong dependence on fO2 for a variety of compositions. Solubility experiments at 800°C and NNO condition – similar conditions to dacitic and rhyolitic magmas - show no statistically meaningful effect of plagioclase composition on solubility. 22 Sample type must be considered when interpreting water concentration data. As demonstrated in Hamada et al. (2011), different types of samples - scoria, lava flow samples and bombs - can show water concentration variations which can be explained by different cooling rates where rapidly quenched samples such as scoria samples retain the highest recorded water content (Mosenfelder et al., 2020). Table 1. Plagioclase parameters published in the literature. The absorbance coefficient (I) determines how far light of a particular wavelength can penetrate into a material before it is absorbed. Diffusion parameter refers to Do is the maximal diffusion coefficient at infinite temperature in m2/s; Ea is the activation energy for diffusion in kJ/mol and D is the diffusion coefficient value which refers to the amount of a particular substance that diffuses across a unit area in 1 s under the influence of a gradient of one unit. Absorbance coefficient Assessment method Author I = 15.3 ± 0.7 ppm–1·cm–2 I = 107000 ± 5000 L·mol–1 H2O cm–2 The slope of a best-fit line through the concentration of H for feldspars with different H concentrations. Johnson & Rossman (2003) I = 202600 ± 20260 L·mol–1 H2O cm–2 Comparison between FTIR and SIMS from several samples Mosenfelder et al. (2015) Diffusion parameter Assessment method Author log D0=-1.62 ± 0.31 (m/s2) and Ea= 266 ± 77 kJ/mol log D0=-0.97 ± 0.35 (m/s2) and Ea= 278 ± 90 kJ/mol D = 3.7465E-15 m2/s at 812°C Dehydration experiments assuming a spherical plagioclase of 1mm at different temperatures (800,900, 1000C) Johnson & Rossman (2013) Water diffusion experiments performed in plagioclase at different temperatures (800- 1000°C) show that hydrogen diffusion in feldspar is isotropic. The diffusion rates of hydrogen and sodium in plagioclase are very similar suggesting that H+ diffusion occurs as H+-Na+ interdiffusion on large cation site vacancies, via Frenkel defects (Figure 5). 23 Based on hydrogen diffusion coefficient, a 1 mm spherical plagioclase during ascent and eruption can retain 50% of its water over periods of hours to days (Johnson & Rossman, 2013). The diffusion parameters published in the literature are listed in Table 1. Figure 5. Frenkel defects in the NaCl structure. It occurs when an atom leaves its normal site vacant and instead occupies an interstitial site (Aschcroft & Mermin, 1976). Water in volcanic feldspars has been explored in few volcanic systems despite its potential to be used as a chronometer (i.e., useful for constraining magma decompression rates based on volatile diffusion) or as a hygrometer (i.e., useful for constraining pre-eruptive magmatic water concentrations). In this study, we explored water behavior in plagioclase crystals from the largest known eruption of Cerro Machin volcano as a potential constraint for magma storage depths and magma migration through the crust. 1.2.4 Water behavior during magma-ascent decompression Magmas are defined as silicate melts that contain solids – crystals and gases – volatiles (Fisher & Schmincke, 1984). According to measurements of volcanic gasses emitted at volcanoes, these volatiles are dominantly H2O, followed by CO2 and SO2. Minor amounts of H2O, CO, HCl and HF have also been detected (Burgisser & Degruyter, 2015). Although the amount of volatiles is only a few weight percent, they play an important role in triggering eruptions (Edmonds, 2008; Sparks, 2003; Woods & Huppert, 2003). The solubility of these volatile species is pressure-dependent which means that once the 24 pressure drops below the saturation pressure they can exsolve into a gas volatile phase (Dixon et al., 1995; Klug & Cashman, 1996; Moore et al., 1998; Newman & Lowenstern, 2002). During magma-ascent decompression, magmas become volatile-saturated which results in the formation of bubbles (first boiling) that grow and expand for volatile diffusion (Edmonds, 2008; Edmonds & Wallace, 2017; Wallace et al., 2015). Volatile exsolution can also occur as a result of isobaric cooling and crystallization (second boiling) which increases the reservoir pressure (Blundy & Cashman, 2001; Cashman & Blundy, 2000; Christopher et al., 2015). Bubbles can form by homogeneous nucleation -spontaneous bubble formation- or by heterogeneous nucleation – crystals acting as nucleation sites (Gardner & Denis, 2004; Mangan & Sisson, 2000; Toramaru, 1989). Once bubbles are formed, the solubility and diffusivity processes govern the degassing process during ascent-driven decompression (Gonnermann & Manga, 2007). Degassing of different volatile species vary with melt composition, temperature, pressure and oxygen fugacity (Dixon & Stolper, 1995; Hamilton et al., 1964; Newman & Lowenstern, 2002). Magma ascent and eruptive style are strongly related to magma degassing behavior (Cassidy et al., 2018). During fast ascent and rapid decompression rates, disequilibrium degassing is promoted since volatiles remain coupled to the melt increasing buoyancy and overpressure - closed-system degassing (Cassidy et al., 2018; Johnson et al., 2008; Métrich & Wallace, 2008; Sparks, 2003; Stasiuk et al., 1996). In contrast, during slow ascent and low decompression rates volatiles are decoupled from the melt allowing bubbles to migrate from deeper to shallower levels. This is referred as open-system degassing or equilibrium degassing in which permeable paths formed by the coalescence of bubbles, enable outgassing which reduces buoyancy and overpressure (Burgisser & 25 Degruyter, 2015; Cassidy et al., 2018; Gonnermann & Manga, 2007; Hammer et al., 1999; Yoshimura & Nakamura, 2008). Estimation on magma decompression rates of different types of eruption (effusive vs explosive) is a powerful tool that can help to understand the physical processes that influence degassing regime and eruptive style of volcanoes. In basaltic systems magma decompression rate correlates with eruption magnitude (Moussallam et al., 2019), however, the lack of this relation in more silicic and higher magnitude eruptions need to be addressed from the study of magma ascent rates of more silicic systems. 1.2.4.1 Tools for estimation of magma ascent rates Different techniques have been performed to constrain the rate at which magma decompresses: 1) experimental studies of amphibole breakdown rims (McCanta et al., 2007; Rutherford & Devine, 2003; Rutherford & Hill, 1993), 2) microlite number density (Andrews, 2014; Cassidy et al., 2015; Castro & Gardner, 2008; Couch et al., 2003; Hammer & Rutherford, 2002; Martel, 2012; Miwa et al., 2009; Noguchi et al., 2008; Sano et al., 2015; Scott et al., 2012; Toramaru et al., 2008; Wright et al., 2012), 3) bubble number density (Carey et al., 2010; Castro & Gardner, 2008; Giachetti et al., 2010; Myers et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2014; Shea et al., 2010; Toramaru, 2006), 4) feldspar composition (Scarlato et al., 2017) however, this relation is not always met (Brugger & Hammer, 2010) 5) diffusion of lithium in plagioclase and quartz (Charlier et al., 2012; Neukampf et al., 2021), 6) diffusion of volatiles in apatite (Li et al., 2020), 6) diffusion of volatiles in melt embayments (Anderson, 1991; Humphreys et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2007; Lloyd et al., 2014; Myers et al., 2016, 2018, 2021) 7) diffusion modelling of water loss from melt inclusions into their olivine-host crystal (Barth et al., 2019) and 8) diffusion of water loss out of nominally anhydrous minerals (Newcombe et al., 2020). In Table 2 26 the range of ascent rates covered by each technique and the processes reflected by each one are shown. Table 2. Magma ascent range covered by each tool used in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of each method are also listed as well as the conduit process evidenced by each approach. Approach Ascent rate range (m/s) Advantage Disadvantage Conduit process Amphibole breakdown rims 0.0001- 1 Thin sections are easy to prepare. Rim width can be measure in Back Scattered Eletron images (BSE) Experimental data for rim development is require for specific magma Reflect decompression from storage conditions to the surface Microlite/Crystal number density (CND) 0.001– 100 Thin sections are easy to prepare. Software have been designed to determine CND on back scattered electron images Data of storage depth, temperature and water content is required. CND cannot resolve ascent rate without independent knowledge of crystal growth rate Reflect decompression- induced crystallization Bubble number density 0.001 - 10 Shea et al. (2010) provide FOAMS software to calculate magma decompression rate based on BSE images. Big difference if heterogeneous or homogeneous nucleation is assumed Reflect nucleation peaks commonly occurring in the upper part of the conduit Feldspar composition 0.01 – 0.1 Feldspar is a common mineral phase in volcanic products Crystals formed at equilibrium conditions are required. The relation between decompression Reflect decompression from storage conditions to the surface 27 Approach Ascent rate range (m/s) Advantage Disadvantage Conduit process rate and composition is not always met Diffusion of lithium in plagioclase and quartz 1.5 - 5 Capture syn- eruptive processes on very short timescales Relation between Li diffusivity and pressure changes is not totally understood Reflect late- stage ascent processes Diffusion of volatiles in apatite 0.01 – 0.001 An online tool for apatite diffusion modelling and estimating magma ascent times is available A weakness of the model is the assumption of a fixed boundary condition (composition of crystal rim) which can vary according to Cl-F-OH changes of the melt. Also, a decrease in temperature during the ascent could lead to slower diffusion rates. Zoned groundmass apatite reflects magma ascent times of days before eruption Diffusion of volatiles in melt embayments 0.01 – 10 Diffusion coefficients in different melt composition are well constrained Melt embayments tend to be rare. Difficult sample preparation Deep conduit. It can reflect changes in the conduit geometry: widening and/or lengthening. Diffusion modelling of water loss from 0.01 - 1 The method is in good agreement with the melt Useful for basaltic- andesitic Reflects syneruptive magma 28 Approach Ascent rate range (m/s) Advantage Disadvantage Conduit process melt inclusions into their olivine-host crystal embayment approach. volcanic products containing olivine decompression rates Diffusion of water loss in nominally anhydrous minerals 0.01 - 1 Olivine is a mineral phase easy to identify. The method is in good agreement with the melt embayment and MI water loss approaches. Water diffusion in olivine is anisotropic Reflects syn- eruptive magma decompression rates 29 Chapter 2: Motivation A major goal of volcanology is to be able to anticipate volcanic eruptions in order to prevent loss of life and to mitigate economic impacts. This requires that volcanologists develop models of volcanic systems that integrate data and methodologies from multiple disciplines (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine, 2017). Several studies have successfully explained how and why volcanoes erupt; nevertheless, some challenges remain related to the physical-chemical processes that control volcanic explosivity. Water represents the essential component in every stage of arc magmatism. It has a major effect in melt generation (Grove et al., 2012), it controls magma crystallization phases and differentiation (Grove et al., 2003) and it provides the fuel for explosive eruptions (Cashman, 2004). Over the last few decades, studies of water in melt inclusions have provided significant information about the amount of water dissolved in magma reservoirs before eruptions, and along with CO2 measurements, have given insights of the storage pressures of magma chambers (Wallace, 2005). However, the pressure solubility dependency of water as well as the multiple port-entrapment processes occurring at surface constitute a challenge to quantify the maximum amount of water dissolved in subduction-related magmas when they last equilibrate with the mantle (Grove et al., 2012). These challenges are still a very active research area (Rose- Koga et al., 2021). Similarly, the role of volatiles on the bubble exsolution rate and degassing style has been highlighted as an important controlling factor for the eruptive style (Barth et al., 2019; Cassidy et al., 2018). Both processes are governed by the magma decompression rate which seems to be poorly constrained in the literature (Barth et al., 2019), especially for 30 dacitic magmas. According to Moussallam et al. (2019), magma decompression rates of felsic eruptions show an unorganized pattern compared to basaltic systems. The lack of a consistent trend underlines the importance of studying magma decompression from more dacite eruptions to identify what controls eruptive style in these systems. Cerro Machin volcano in Colombia represents a good example to explore with at least six dacitic Plinian eruptions occurring in the last 10000 years BP, and no volatile data published in the literature. Our approach for estimating magma decompression rates in dacitic eruptions involves the application of a volatile diffusion model based on water concentration gradients in plagioclase, a nominally anhydrous mineral (NAM) and a common mineral phase from any volcanic product. As confirmed by Newcombe et al. (2020), NAMs represent an important insight to study water behavior during magmatic processes, nevertheless, there are hardly any measurements of water in volcanic feldspar phenocrysts (Figure 6) (Hamada et al., 2013; Johnson & Rossman, 2003, 2004; Mosenfelder et al., 2020; Shepherd & Johnson, 2016). One complexity of feldspar crystals is that concentration of water must be estimated by the integrated absorbance of three mutually perpendicular directions. Authors from previous studies have polished four orthogonal faces of one plagioclase block, losing information from the crystal edges of the polished faces. In this study, a different sample preparation method is explored in which the crystals are cut in half and subsequently only two faces from each half are polished. With this method we will be able to measure water concentration from the core to the crystal edge which is in contact with the host magma. 31 Figure 6. Compilation of published water content in feldspar crystals by (Mosenfelder et al., 2020). Loss heating experiments in plagioclase have been conducted in the past by Johnson & Rossman (2013) who calculated the hydrogen diffusivity in natural OH-bearing plagioclase feldspar (Ab66An31Or3, with 510 ppm H2O). However, natural volcanic feldspar are commonly zoned presenting chemical variations in very high-resolution bands. A recent study by Behrens (2021) found further complexities associated with the diffusion of water in feldspar: the diffusivity of water in both plagioclase and alkali feldspar was observed to slow down over the course of their experiments. Clearly there is a need for further exploration of water diffusion in feldspar and such experiments represent an important avenue of future investigation. In particular, it will be important to conduct dehydration experiments in natural volcanic feldspars in order to assess the effect of the plagioclase major element zoning on the diffusivity of H through the crystal. This would help us to understand if water gradients in feldspar respond to the chemical zoning of the crystals or in contrast they are intimately related to degassing and magma ascent processes. 32 2.1 Colombian perspective Colombia has more than 20 active volcanoes (Figure 7A), which are permanently monitored by the Colombian Geological Survey (Servicio Geológico Colombiano, SGC) (Gomez et al., 2021). However, Colombia not always had the monitoring network they have today. The disasters of Doña Juana (1899, 1906), Puracé (1949), Galeras (1993) and Nevado del Ruiz (1545, 1845, 1985) volcanoes are clear examples of the importance of studying volcanoes to prevent future tragedies (Figure 7B). According to the geological record, volcanoes such as Animas, Azufral and Cerro Machin have had several Plinian eruptions. The severe implications of Plinian events make it very important to understand the processes that trigger this type of explosive activity and how it can be potentially related to the seismological and geochemical signature recorded by the volcanic monitoring. In particular, Cerro Machin is considered one of the most explosive volcanoes in the country with a very explosive geological record that include at least six Plinian eruptions (Cortes et al., 2006). Moreover, in case of eruption Cerro Machin would affect one of the most populated areas of the country as well as the only land transport connection between the capital of Colombia – Bogota- and the south of the country (Gomez et al., 2021). 33 Figure 7. Geological context of active Colombian volcanoes. A. Map of Colombia with the different active volcanoes. B. Most tragic eruptions in Colombia, each bar represents one eruption from a specific volcano and the associated number of deaths. In this study, a petrological investigation of the largest known eruption of Cerro Machin volcano is presented. Bulk rock composition of the juvenile material together with major element, trace element and volatile content in melt inclusions hosted in plagioclase and quartz crystals, provide the key criteria for the interpretation of melt generation processes happening beneath CMV. In addition, we reconstruct the storage conditions, triggering mechanism and degassing history of this eruption based on mineral and mineral-liquid geothermobarometry, volatile content in melt inclusions and NAMs and water diffusion modeling in feldspar. This new contribution will be one of the inputs that can be incorporated into the studies of volcanic hazards of Cerro Machin volcano, which are very useful to the responsible government entities for the vulnerability and risk studies. Therefore, the politicians and decision makers can carry out proposals for integral planning of the Colombian territory and also create adaptation strategies and resilience 34 mechanisms for the communities who live in the areas of influence of this volcano (Vega & Diaz, 2013). 2.2 Statement of purpose This project aims to constrain the pre-eruptive conditions that influenced the largest known Plinian eruption of Cerro Machin volcano, Colombia in order to understand the plumbing system of this volcano and evaluate new approaches to estimate magma ascent rates. 2.2.1 Specific objectives 1. To identify and describe the pyroclastic fall deposits associated with the largest eruption of Cerro Machin volcano. 2. To describe the vertical and distance-related variations of the deposits in order to characterize the nature and evolution of the eruption. 3. To characterize the mineralogy and componentry of representative samples in order to recognize the juvenile material. 4. To determine the storage conditions of the magma (temperature, pressure) related to this eruption using the chemistry of the juvenile material. 5. To assess magmatic water content and chemical composition prior to the eruption based on phenocryst-hosted melt inclusions. 6. To estimate magma ascent rates based on modeling of diffusive water loss in plagioclase phenocrysts. 35 Chapter 3: Methods 3.1 Field work The pyroclastic fall deposits of Cerro Machin volcano have been identified as the products of six major eruptions: a 5000 yr BP eruption named El Espartillal; a 4800 yr BP eruption named P0; a 3600 yr BP eruption named P1; a 2600 yr BP eruption named Guaico; a 1200 yr BP eruption named P2; and a 900 yr BP eruption named Anillo (Rueda, 2005). The best exposures of the largest known explosive eruption P1 (3600 yr BP) are found to the west of the volcano. Fieldwork outcome was a detailed description of 28 stratigraphic profiles (Appendix A). Each deposit was described in terms of the following characteristics: bed thickness, bed geometry, type of contacts, color, sedimentary structures, sorting, framework, roundness, shapes, and macroscopic components were recorded at a field scale to correlate the different deposits from proximal to distal areas. The different parameters mentioned were used to interpret the beginning, evolution and final stage of each event. Pyroclastic fall deposits from different eruptions were recognized based on the identification of sharp contacts representing erosion times and fine-grain size layers representing lower energy events or different fragmentation mechanisms. Pauses in the eruptive activity were recognized by the presence of paleosols (Fisher & Schmincke, 1984). The sampling process required the characterization of different lithofacies within each unit. For P1, clasts of pumice from the bottom, middle and top sections of the layer were collected in proximal to medial areas. The size of these clasts ranges from medium lapilli to coarse lapilli with a diameter of 10-64 mm as they represent rapidly quenched material that did not experience water loss due to post-eruptive cooling (Lloyd et al., 2013). When the average grain size of the layer was less than 2 mm, samples from the whole layer were collected without any distinction. Laminated lithofacies were sampled 36 according to fabric and grain size association. Matrix-supported fine-grain size layers were sampled separately from clast-supported coarse-grain size layers. In distal areas, bulk samples of each lithofacies were collected. 3.2 Sample preparation Ten samples of pumice clasts from the bottom, middle and top regions of the P1 layer— the target eruption—were ranked by decreasing size from 10 for the largest clast to 1 for the smallest clast. Ten of them were cut in half and one half was made into a thin section by Spectrum Petrographics, Inc. The other half from each clast was lightly crushed and sieved, and plagioclase and quartz phenocrysts were separated by hand using a Leica S9i Stereomicroscope. The phenocrysts were immersed in isopropanol in order to screen for cracks, melt inclusions and melt re-entrants. Phenocrysts were mounted in Crystalbond and polished on two parallel sides until the melt inclusions were doubly exposed. We chose melt inclusions that were wholly enclosed (i.e., no cracks or re-entrant features) regardless of their position within the crystal - core or closer to the rim. Sometimes more than one melt inclusion was analyzed in the same crystal. All melt inclusions contained multiple small vapor bubbles, especially those hosted in quartz crystals. These vapor bubbles made it difficult to measure water concentration profiles in melt re-entrants. For analysis of water concentration gradients, crystals of plagioclase were cut in half using a Wire Saw (WS 25) with a 20-micron wire and each half was polished to intersect different crystallographic axes (see Figure 8). Following FTIR analysis, a subset of 36 melt inclusions and 16 crystals cut in half—a total of 32 wafers—were placed in dental resin for EPMA analysis. Once hardened, the dental resin mount was polished with 0.3- μm aluminum paste to remove residual material from the dental resin preparation and 37 expose the melt inclusions and crystals. Finally, the ten thin sections of pumice clasts from the bottom, middle and top of the layer were analyzed by petrographic microscope and then carbon coated for Electron Probe Microanalyzer (EPMA) at the Advanced Imaging and Microscopy Laboratory (AIMLab) in the Maryland Nanocenter at the University of Maryland. 3.3 Componentry and petrographic analysis Component analysis was conducted in the 0φ, 1φ and 2φ (1, 0.3 and 0.2 mm) size fractions of individual lithofacies from P1. A total of ˜300 particles per size fraction were described following the methodology of Cas and Wright (1987) in which particles are classified as juvenile, accessory and accidental material (Appendix B, Table A). Component variations in the different phases within the eruptive units were key to interpret potential fragmentation mechanisms and changes in eruptive style. In addition, different textures of pumices were described under a binocular microscope to support interpretations of the following analysis. The petrographic analyses of ten thin sections were conducted with a Leica DM750P Petrographic Microscope (Appendix C). The different mineral phases were classified by size, and detailed descriptions of growth textures (e.g. oscillatory zoning, patchy zoning, presence of inclusion rims) and disequilibrium textures (e.g. rounded shapes, sieve textures, breakdown rims) were provided. During petrographic sessions, detailed maps of each thin section were made in order to identify mineral phases for analysis by Electron Probe Microanalyzer (EPMA). 38 3.4 Whole rock geochemistry Whole rock chemistry by X-ray fluorescence of five pumice clasts from P1 was conducted in the Department of Earth & Environment in Franklin and Marshall College by Professor Stanley Mertzman (Appendix D). According to the lab methodology, the total volatile concentration (%LOI) is determined by weighing out 1 gram of sample, placing in a muffle furnace at 950C for 1.5 hours, removing and cooling it to room temperature in a desiccator and re-weighing in order to see the weight change. A portion of this anhydrous powder is mixed with lithium tetraborate, placed in a platinum crucible and heated until molten. After mixing it is transferred to a platinum casting dish and quenched. The resulting glass disk is then analyzed for oxides including SiO2, TiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 Total, MnO, MgO, CaO, Na2O, K2O, and P2O5. For trace element analysis a high purity copolywax powder is added to the whole rock powder. It is mixed and pressed into a briquette at 50,000 psi. Data for Rb, Sr, Y, Zr, V, Ni, Cr, Nb, Ga, Cu, Zn, Co, Ba, U, Th, La, Ce, Sc, and Pb are reposted in parts per million (ppm). 3.5 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR): volatile concentrations Transmission infrared spectra of the melt inclusions were obtained using a Thermo Nicolet iN10 MX Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FTIR) with a liquid nitrogen- cooled MCT detector at the University of Maryland. The sample and surroundings were continuously purged with dry, CO2-free air to eliminate any contribution from atmospheric CO2 to the spectra. The aperture of the infrared beam was set to 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 microns based on melt inclusion size. Spectra from at least three different apertures at 4 cm-1 resolution and an average of 256 scans were measured per 39 melt inclusion in order to calculate the uncertainty in the absorbance peak heights (Appendix E, Table B). Water concentration was calculated from peak heights using the Beer-Lambert Law (Eq. 1) Eq (1) 𝐶 = (𝑚𝑤)∗(𝐴) 𝜌∗𝑑∗𝜀 where C is concentration of water in weight fraction of the absorbing species, mw is the molecular weight (g/mol) of the volatile species (18.02 for total H2O and 44.01 for CO2), A is the absorbance peak height measured with the OMNIC software using a straight baseline in all cases, ρ is the density of the glass (g/L), d is the inclusion thickness (cm) , and ε is the molar absorption coefficient (L/mol·cm). In rhyolitic compositions, glass densities strongly depend on total H2O concentration, therefore the use of an iterative process is required to converge on appropriate values [Eq. 2 (Skirius et al., 1990)]: Eq (2) ρ = 2350 – 12.6 CH2O Water dissolved in silicate glass absorbs infrared light at 5,200 cm−1 and ∼1,630 cm−1 (attributed to molecular water, H2O) at 4,500 cm−1 (attributed to hydroxyl, OH), and at 3,550 cm−1 (the fundamental OH stretching vibration, with contributions from both molecular water and hydroxyl). In case of melt inclusions with the 3550 cm-1 peak saturated (i.e., close to 100% of the light was absorbed at this frequency), the 5200 cm−1 and 4500 cm−1 were used for water calculations. When observed, CO2 is present as molecular CO2 at 2,350 cm−1. The molar absorption coefficient (ε) for the peaks were calculated based on the calibration equations of Newman et al. (1986), Zhang et al. 40 (1997), Ohlhorst et al. (2001) and Nishimura et al. (2005) for 5,200 cm−1 and 4,500 cm−1 peaks (Appendix E, Table A). The absorption coefficient (e) for molecular CO2 (2350 cm– 1) in rhyolitic glass is 1214 L/mol·cm (Behrens et al., 2004). Inclusions and crystal thickness were measured using a Mitutoyo micrometer. For thin crystals (< 40 microns), we use a calibrated stereozoom lens with a 1 mm objective. Measurements were done with the measuring tool box of the LEICA S9 software on the Leica S9i Stereomicroscope. Several measurements across the crystal edge were taken and then averaged for following calculations. Thicknesses of eight singly exposed melt inclusions hosted in quartz (see Table 3) were calculated using the host quartz silicate overtones [Eq. 3 (Tollan et al., 2019)]: Eq (3) Thickness (MI) = 𝐴𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑧 − 𝐴𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑧+𝑀𝐼 𝐴𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑧 × measured thickness, Where AQuartz is the integrated absorbance of the 2136 cm−1 overtone (molecular vibration in the near-infrared spectra) of pure quartz adjacent to the melt inclusion, AQuartz+MI is the integrate