MARGUERITE HIGGINS: JOURNALIST 1920-1960 by Kathleen Kearney Keeshen ... /1 o. .,.. y j 04. "' d /_] ],)_3 ) .l17ocl k ees'1en I . J< . j v().J, 1 ~Ot-Io Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1983 C.oe...J l uo <- . l APPROVAL SHEET Title of Dissertation: Name of Candidate: Marguerite Higgins: Journalist 1920-1966 Kathleen Kearney Keeshen Doctor of Philosophy, 1983 Dissertation and Abstract Approved: Date Approved: ;/e;/..:J on 0. Lounsbury Associate Professo American Studies Program © Copyright Kathleen Kearney Keeshen 1983 Title of Dissertation: ABSTRACT Marguerite Higgins: Journalist 1920-1966 Kathlee n Kearne y Keeshen, Doctor o f Philosophy, 1983 Dissertation dire cted by: Dr. Myron 0. Lounsbury Associate Professor American Studies Program The purpo se of this dissertation is to explore the journalistic c a reer of Marguerite Higgins from 1940 to 1966, t o analyze her notions of news and news writing and of the duties of a journalist, and to assess her contributions to the field of American journalism. Marguerite Higgins was the first woman to win a Pulitzer Prize in journalism for international reporting. Her award recognized her war correspondence from Korea, where she firmly established the acceptance of women covering the news from the battlefield. Higgins contributed to mid-twentieth century jour- nalism in signficant ways: she wrote hundred of articles for newspapers and periodicals over the twenty-five years of her career. Her work ranged from cub reporting on the Vallejo (California) Times-Herald, to a twenty-one year career with the New York Herald Tribune, to the rank of syndicated columnist with the Newsday Syndicate in the early Sixties. A graduate of the University of California at Berke ley and of Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism in 1942, Higgins d emonstrated that a woman could handle the professional demands and responsibil­ ities of fast-paced and often danger-filled journalism. In addition to her front-page newspaper stories, Higgins described events of the times in scores of periodicals and in a number of books that include War in Korea: Report of a Woman Combat Correspondent (1951); News Is a Singular Thing (1955); Red Plush and Black Bread (1956); and Our Vietnam Nightmare (1965). In addition in 1962, she wrote a juvenile, Jessie Benton Fremont, and with Peter Lisagor, in 1963, described experiences of some State Department representatives in a collection called Overtime in Heaven: Tales of the Foreign Service. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 I. II. III. IV. v. VI. VII. VIII. IX. x. XI. XII. XIII. XIV. Early Years ........................... . Berkeley: The Makings of a Journalist . Readying for the Race: Cub Reporter to Foreign Correspondent ............ . Foreign Correspondence: Dispatches from war-Torn Europe .................. . Assignment in Germany ................. . Berlin Airlift ........................ . Korea ................................. . The Pulitzer and Its Aftermath ........ . Marguerite, Marriage and Motherhood ... . Washington: Early Fifties ............. . Washington: Late Fifties .............. . Washington: Early Sixties ............. . Vietnam ............................... . Summation ............................. . Appendix A. world war II Accredited Women Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. Appendix E. Reporters ..................... . Dachau Liberation ............... . . Nuremberg War Trials Coverage 1. November 20, 1945 ........... . 2 . November 22, 1945 ........... . 3. November 24, 1945 ........... . Inchon Landing .................. . . Crest Testimonial ................ . 10 35 57 73 129 159 175 236 271 289 312 338 358 403 411 414 416 418 421 425 429 Personal Interviews and Correspondence ........... 431 Selected Bibliography ........................... . Official Documents Consulted ....... ......... ..... 437 456 PREFACE A study of Marguerite Higgins's career as a journal­ ist, author, columnist and l e cturer from 1940 to 1966, is important for a number of reasons. As one of the most successful and we ll-known women journalists in the Twentieth Century practicing her craft during a period of open sex discrimination, the patterns of her life suggest possible paths for success for women journalists of succeeding generations. Characteristics common to both success ful men and women journalists emerge through an examination of those she possessed and exhibited. Studying the circumstances and events surrounding her contributions may shed light on the experiences of her women peer contemporaries and women journalists of the future. Finally, an examination of the fame and reknown she gained may provide insights to the process of how journalists on occasion become public figures in American society. This study is characterized by a number of impedi­ ments for a researcher. Little critical assessment of her work and contributions exists. Much of what has been written is drawn from her own statements, her autobiography and other self-description, usually appearing as short vignettes in collections. Sources for her own statements include her published writings -­ newspaper articles, books, magazine pieces and columns. Correspondence, as existent in the Margueri te Higgins iv Collection in the George Arents Research Library at Syracuse University, is sparse. In addition, no extensive study has yet been conducted. Existing descriptions then must be considered subjective and open to scrutiny. This study investigates her contributions as a mid-century American woman journalist from the points of view of a number of witnesses: her journalistic peers, through their remembrances and descriptive anecdotes; her profession's accepted leaders, by the process of their selection of her for honors, awards and recognition from among her contemporaries; her family and friends, out of recollections of incidents that reflect her character and motivation; her public, as exemplified by their response to her newspaper stories and columns, speeches and books; her .professional superiors, based on their assessments of her work and observations on her contributions; professional critics, as described in their evaluations and assessments of her individual works; on those books, articles and other material she wrote, and on the record itself, through the facts and impressions these information sources reveal about her . This study also seeks to explore the question of to what extent, if any, being a woman in a traditionally men's profession obstructed her attainment of profes­ sional objectives, recognition and acceptance. V Conversely, it also will examine what advantages, if any, accrued to her in this regard because of her sex. This study also examines the personal conflicts Marguerite Higgins experienced in attempting to reconcile the demands of a writing career, personal emotional fulfillment and family responsibilities. Her ambitions and aspirations in any one major endeavor, by her own descriptions as well as the observation of others, would suggest the possibility of success only through a single-minded pursuit of each to the exclusion of the others. By contrast, her goals were for a success in e very single sphere and for a success superior to that enjoyed by peers and role models, in all areas. Within the spheres of career , self-satisfaction and family, the results of her self-imposed standards will be examined. The self-imposed necessity for her not only to be recognized as a top ranking newspaper reporter, but also as a public figure, provided complications for her. The need to appear not only under her newspaper's banner, but as a book author, magazine article contributor and television show participant reflect the life-long drive and ambition she nurtured. In selecting a husband, as a practicing professional, her choice would be complicated by her spouses's previous marriage and family and a lack of financial resources. By the same token, though f e w practicing women journalists of her time combined their VI strenuous and demanding careers with motherhood, her desire for a family would lead to three full-term pregnancies while she fulfilled day-to-day reporting requirements. Later, as mother of two surviving children and the wife of an important military general, himself somewhat of a public figure, her life oscillated between the satisfactions of recognition and the conflicts inherent in competing demands. Her response to the conflicts will be examined through her own autobiographical statements in books and articles, the comments of observers and the record itself as it is available in existing documentation. Her role as a woman member of the journalistic profession will be examined from several views: her interpretation of the role of a journalist, man or woman; her assessment of the expectation held for women as journalists and her reaction to that expectation; the expectation male journalists held for women ; the role of women in newspapers of her time as described in her writings, by other participants and in documentation such as written statements and official accounts in published sources. In addition to her own statements of perceived discrimination and, in some cases, preference, because of her sex , statements of her contemporaries such as Kathleen McLaughlin of The New York Times, Toni Howard of V(l Newsweek, Sonia Tomara of the New York Herald Tribune, Helen Kirkpatrick of the Chicago Daily News, and Tania Long of the Herald Tribune, will be examined. Her relationships with reporter peers, editors and publishers will be described, as well as her unique approach to newsgathering in technique and performance. Additionally, this study seeks to identify the unique contributions Marguerite Higgins made to American journalism in becoming a public figure as a Twentieth Century woman journalist and to explain the significance of that role for women to follow. In this regard, her life as a public person will be examined through media reports as well as the counterpoint of recollections and assessments of family, old friends and professional acquaintances who knew her over the years. Their recollections, where possible, will be compared to the record, as it exists. The study will explore the influences of her life and the effects of those influences, in an attempt to explain what her underlying and unstated motivations may have been. In addition, her ultimate professional achievements will be related to her private pursuits, victories and disappointments. Again, much of the available information is subjective in nature. Comparisons of her statements and those of observers will be made, where possible, to existing viii documentation and to the recollection of others present at the time. The views of men in positions of authority -- both in the field of journalism and in official capacities interacting with women journalists -- will be included as a measure of the environment in which she and other women journalists of the period worked. In this regard, the self-assessments of women peers will also be reviewed. Marguerite Higgins's writing style and reportorial techniques will be examined, although it may not be possible to know from the finished products of her work what refinements of editors, rewrite personnel and others in the publications process are included. Few of her original manuscripts, and none of any signficicant length, remain. While journalists are assumed to possess basic writing skills and the ability to produce succinct, clear and accurate descriptions of events, style, always desirable, often may be of less importance to an editorial staff than displayed initiative, accuracy, vitality, ingenuity and responsiveness to unfolding newsworthy events by a reporter, as John Hohenberg, formerly of Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism, among others, has cited. (See, for example, his text, The Professional Journalist: A Guide To The Practices And Principles Of The News Media, published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.) In the case of war correspondence, f or which Mar guerite was particular ly well known, courage and the ability to write under pressure were added values. Good reporte rs must also have the ability to understand the complex ities of the subjects they write about, including the ability to discern fact from fiction, quickly, with accuracy, and in proper perspe ctive to the overall body of knowledge in the particular subject area. In addition to general knowledge, a reporter's ability to perservere in pursuing questions beyond the obvious and in cultivating contacts and sources for cross-che cking, as well as for obtaining future information, are vital reporting tools. The extent to which Marguerite practiced these reportorial techniques will be examined through her own descriptions, those of others and the record itself. In addition, the increasing monetary value of Marguerite's contributions for her newspaper, magazine and book publishing endeavors and the extent of her editors' repeated use of her writing will also be described as an additional measure of her writing effectiveness. Since the most signficant body of her work was daily newspaper reporting, which traditionally, as well as ideally, seeks objectivity and freedom from personal opinion, the development of her political and ideological thought is difficult to discern from her non-autobio- graphical writing. Glimpses into her political X pursuasions come rather from her writings as a columnist in the last two year s of her life and descriptions of her own development . (See, among others , John Hohenberg's text, mentioned earlier, W. G. Bleyer ' s The Profession Of Journalism, Boston, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1918; e t a l.) Somewhat more useful in this regard may be an assessment of her last book, Our Vietnam Nightmare , described by some as a polemic and yet perhaps as revealing a document as any suggesting he r political stance . Once more, personal assessments of family , friends and professional peers have been sought to supplement the scanty evidence available. Given the existing research difficulties, this study nevertheless will attempt to place Marguerite Higgins and her contributions in a framework of Twentieth Century journalism. It will attempt to assess both in terms of t heir signficance to the broad field of U.S. journalism in general and the specfic practice of journalism by women in that field. INTRODUCTION Marguerite Higgins, one o f the mos t successful woman journal i sts of the twe ntieth century, was bo rn on September 3, 1920, in the British Crown Colony of Hong Kong. Her pa rents were an adventurous Irish-American busine ssman, Lawrence Daniel Higgins, and his French war bride, the former Marguerite de Godard. She was a child of relative privilege, though modest circumstances, and grew up shutt l ing between America and France during the Depression and post-Depression years. She was thus blessed with the opportunity for e xceptional experience s and a wide ranging education . At the same time, she was profoundly affected by the engulfing results of America's economic misery. Throughout her life, she was dogged by the fear of poverty and the need for financial security. For this reason, she held the worlds of the wealthy and powerful in especially high esteem, and her ambition for profess­ ional succe ss was matched by a burning desire to be accepted in these worlds. Although of an enigmatic and complex nature, she was often portrayed as a simple, stereotypical "lady report­ er.'' Many saw her sharing a likeness to the comics' Brenda Star. Marguerite, like Starr, struck observers as being beautiful, charming and exceedingly intelligent. Marguerite was also aggressive, daring and relentless in pursuing the news. Successful as few women reporters 2 before or since have been, Marguerite Higgins relished her reputation and success, however described. Far from being a stereotype, however, Marguerite was very much an individual, independent in intellect, fierce, tough-minded, discerning and gifted, with an abundance of good health and great natural energy. Often that energy, together with her enormous spontaneity, led her into quandries where the more circumspect would not have wandered. She proved an able competitor for the best men journalists of her time, but thought nothing of trading on her femininity if the occasion warranted. In fact, she believed the trading somewhat evened the score. Being a woman journalist in the period when she worked had very real disadvantages, and she was determined to make the most of all the assets she had. From the beginning, Marguerite was drawn to journalism by challenge. Faraway wars, exotic places, important people, and the unfolding of power always fascinated her. At the same time , she felt deeply for all the world ' s victims, and journalism seemed an obvious outlet for her interests. As a young person, she was inspired by journalists Ernest Hemingway and Vincent Sheean, and as a cub reporter, she sought to follow in their professional footsteps. 3 After graduating from the University of California at Berkeley in 1941, and from Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism in New York the following year, Marguerite devoted most of her career to reporting for the New York Herald Tribune, a leader among the country's respected dailies at the time. Part-time work as the campus stringer for Columbia University for the New York Herald Tribune led to two years as a full-time city reporter before Marguerite received the overseas assignment she sought. Thi s assignment would lead to her coverage of the closing days of World War II, including the liberation of the Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps and the Nuremberg war trials that followed. And since she was also assigned to cover the Allied forces in Europe, she wrote a wide variety of page-one stories, including the capture of Berchtesgaden, Hitler's Bavarian home, and interviews with the Fuehrer's servants and staff, all of which were of apparent interest to the American newspaper reader. After the war, Marguerite, at 26, become the Herald Tribune's youngest Berlin bureau chief. She was on hand for the dramatic days of the Berlin Airlift, making more than 20 flights in and out of the beleaguered city with the American military forces. Newly named Far East bureau chief for the paper in 1950, she was among the first reporters on the scene at the outbreak of the 4 Korean conflict , and she was the only woman covering its opening days. Marguerite's reporting of that war brought her national and international fame as well as the prestig­ ious Pulitzer Prize in journalism for international reporting in 1951. She was the first woman in the then 34-year history of the Prize ever to be recognized for war correspondence. In fact, only two other women in the Prize's existence had ever won a journalism Pulitzer in any category before. Marguerite became a cause celebre when Lieutenant General Walton H. Walker ordered her out of Korea. It wasn't the type of war "where women ought to be running around the front lines," he said. She objected directly to General o f the Army Douglas MacArthur, as did the Trib. MacArthur rescinded the order the next day, but not before e ven the Soviet press had featured Marguerite and the incident in a cartoon labeled, "MacArthur's First Victory." It was, in fact, a significant victory not only for Marguerite, but for all women reporters seeking battlefield access to cover the news. Many others followed her and gave outstanding reporting performances. Marguerite's best-selling War In Korea: The Report of a Woman Correspondent, was written largely between battles as she filed daily copy for the Trib. It was to be the beginning of a career of many facets for her. She 5 wrote six books, in addition to the endless words of newspaper copy pouring from her typewriter. Concurrent- ly, the publicity surrounding her Korean War coverage sparked speaking engagements, radio and television appearances on the major networks and public broadcasting stations alike, awards and public appearances of all kinds. Vogue magazine once ran her photograph, full-page, on awarding her its special prize for outstanding achievement. She was married twice. Her first marriage was of short duration, and followed her graduation from Columbia in her first year of work with the Trib. The second marriage, from all indications, brought her peace, stability and fulfillment. With her husband and two children (their first child, prematurely born, died as an infant), she settled in Washington, a diplomatic corres­ pondent for the Trib. In Washington, she enjoyed the life of a high-ranking general's wife and the fame of being a celebrity in her own right. The world, she said I was her beat. She reported from its farthest outposts, as well as from the U.S. She was comfortable among many of the world's leaders and influential individuals and earned a solid reputation for obtaining hard-to-get interviews, whether with a head of state or the with the mother of a recently martyred President. Exclusive interviews, she said, were 6 her forte. For two decades, she traveled the globe, holding discussions with world statesmen and commenting on crucial political developments. After 22 years with the New York Herald Tribune, including eight on the Washington diplomatic beat, Marguerite joined the Newsday Syndicate of Long Island, New York, writing "On the Spot," a thrice-weekly commentary. A fourth column, "Inside Washington," featured exclusive anecdotes and inside details on Washington happenings. More than 60 papers within two years published her columns, including The Washington Star, the Chicago Daily News and The Philadelphia Inquirer. She appeared on The Washington Post's editorial page when Walter Lippmann vacationed, an honor which pleased her greatly. Described in her time as a "living legend," she seemed continually gifted in being on the scene to report and provide commentary on the world's crises. In her commitment to uncovering the truth and to informing the public about American involvement in Vietnam she contracted leischmanaisis -- a tropical disease believed to come from a sand fly 's bite. That infection was believed to have been contracted during the last of her eleven trips to Vietnam and other Asian trouble spots. 7 Marguerite's reporting was judged incisive by her peers, and some said she served as a "journalistic early warning system." For example, she was one of the first reporters to note an ominously large number of Russians entering Cuba in 1962. And she was virtually alone in initially reporting that Vietnamese Buddhists, depicted originally as victims of religious oppression, were actually political enemies of the Diem regime with a carefully-orchestrated program of getting media attention by spectacular self-immolation. Marguerite was not the first woman war corres­ pondent, and in some views, not necessarily the best, but her contributions decisively enhanced the professional possibilities for all women journalists to follow . There was much she owed to the women reporters who preceded her and who pioneered in what had traditionally been a man's profession. But in many other unique and essential ways, she brought a new level of acceptance for her sex in newspapering and in recognition of women's ability to report and comment on the vital issues of the day. She was not without critics. Many reporters abhorred what seemed to them unfair use of "feminine wiles," resented the special attentions accorded her as a woman, attacked her for alleged breaches of ethical conduct, and steadfastly refused to grant her profes- sional respect. Often denigrated by her male peers as a 8 glamour girl masquerading as a newspaper professional, she nevertheless managed to compete with and often surpass the best o f them. Her shortcomings were, in fact, the mirror image of he r str e ngths: she was strong willed, stubborn, impul­ sive, sel f -centered. She manipulated people for her own purposes, spent an inordinate amount of time and energy in s e lf-aggrandizement, and was periodically led into awkward follies by vanity and the need for admiration and acceptance. Her intellect, beauty, poise and self-confidence were powerful assets, but it would be her drive, above all, that directed her life and sustained her success. Her peers were, actually, the first to acknowledge that she was a force to be reckoned with. She absolutely believed her insights were important, and she would not be stopped from describing them, even though as a woman and often in the political minority as well -- she spoke as an isolated voice. Despite sexist bias commonly encountered, she accepted challenges as they came and usually proved successful. There was much about her to appeal to a public looking for heroes and heroines. Her bright smile, good looks and the gift for a quick and entertaining retort often made her the subject of a story. Her peers were only too happy to present her as a madcap, glamour girl 9 reporter. But her heroism and courage in the face of danger, particularly in battle, established her profes­ sional credentials and simultaneously endeared her to the reading public. With page-one by-lines from the Korean battlefield and other global crises, she became an example for journalists of both sexes. Her rise to fame and influ- ence had been as swift as it was dramatic. In little more than a score of years, she earned a special niche among the world's foreign correspondents, who respected her tenacity, perserverance and drive. As Dan DeLuce, Pulitzer-Prize winning Associated Press newsman, said, "Talent and courage and grace . Marguerite had it all." A study of Marguerite Higgins's life is particularly appropriate at a time when women's roles and work are being examined and reassessed. Her career provides a meaningful perspective for women journalists today and for those who will follow the profession in the future. I. EARLY YEARS Margue rite Higgins was born in the Bri tish Crown l Colony of Hong Kong on September 3, 1920. -- an uncommon place for an American citizen to join the world. She would prove as extraordinary in her life as in her birth. Being born i n the Twenties , which for most Americans was a time of search for normalcy after victory in the "war to end all wars," was a period of special conditions. Specifically, to be born female in the Twenties would be to be born with special obstacles; this was particularly true for a woman who would seek to attain male prerogatives -- world-wide fame and recognition -- and who would aspire to and realize a life-long ambition to become a respected voice influencing world-wide opinion. Few American women were recognized in the world of journalism , either as practicing reporters , columnists, publishers or newspaper managing personnel . In addition to the dearth of role models for women with such aspirations, the public expectation for women in the workplace was not to assume such leadership positions. I n general, it was hardly a time characterized by of political sophistication. Just eight days before her birth, America approved the vote for women. 2 And that only after years of campaigning by the country ' s suffragists and their supporters. The first radio (0 11 broadcast, too, barely precede d he r birth, and sound movies still under development, 3 preceded it. These media would p r ove especially importa nt to her, and in the span of her career, she exploited all of them in pursuing the news and making her point of view known to the public. In the broadest sense, if there was any era in America's history that appreciated "glamour," as an elusive but desirable aura, it was the Twenties, as Scott Fitzgerald's work illustrated. Compelling charm, attractiveness, wit and a sense of style helped establish the romantic figure. Marguerite came by "glamour" quite naturally. She was born to unusually attractive parents. They were, individually and as a couple, both "dashing" and "appealing," attributes that would later be applied to Marguerite. 4 Her French mother was charming, quixotic, strong-willed and impulsive. She was also ambitious, demanding, graceful, bright and beautiful. 5 Marguerite would inherit most of these traits and other complementary ones from her father's side. Lawrence Daniel Higgins readily fit any number of heroic American molds. His handsomeness was often likened by friends and family to that of everyone's hero, Charles Lindbergh. 6 Like the Twenties' "Lindy," Larry Higgins was adventurous and as dramatic a figure as his times and circumstances would permit. 12 An Irish-American of high spirits, he was immersed in the excitement of his times, as a means -- according to Marguerite -- of "escaping the flabby routine of his petit bourgeois life in Oakland," a city, she added, that was ''noted for neither character nor excitement." 7 Larry Higgins -- the son of Daniel Higgins, an Irish immigrant, and Annie Taylor, a native of Utah -- combined the pioneering American spirit of both. 8 He had, for example, volunteered to fly for France in World War I at 17. unable to obtain a flying assignment, he became a volunteer ambulance driver, 9 abandoning his studies as the University of California to partially fulfill his strong desire to be where the action was, as friends and 10 family report . His exhilaration with the excitement of war r emained with him throughout his life. 11 Larry Higgins inspired Marguerite's involvement in combat correspondence and from the sidelines cheered her forays into battle. Father and daughter both were irresistibly drawn to the dramas of their times and shared intense desires to play a part in history. Neither would be satisfied with a role as witness. Each wanted an actual part. And both would succeed to the . . . d 12 extent opportunities permitte . Marguerite's blonde good looks reflected those of both parents. Larry Higgins, six feet tall, is remember­ ed by a close family friend, Jean Craig Clack, 13 as 13 being particularly engaging. His blond shock of hair and blue eyes complemented a r e ady smile and striking features. He was a "good fellow" and admire d by many • t h • d 1 14 fr i ends. To Margueri e, e was a paragon, an i ea . In difficult times, it is said, heroes are at a premium. The Twenties could qualify by that description. There was a real need for heroes and for the shre d of 1 . d d • • d lS hope they symbo ize an inspire . Marguerite's parents met in Paris. During the German bombardment of the city , Larry Higgins, Marguerite de Godard, and a mutual friend in the Red Cross all sought a haven in a Metro station the nearest air raid shelter. 16 After a brief courtship, the two were married shortly after the Armistice, and sailed for Hong Kong. 17 He had withdrawn once again18 from the University of California, this time for good, in order to support his new wife and assume marital responsibilities. He took a job as assistant freight manager for what was then the Pacific Mail Steamship Company. It was 1918, and he was 23. 19 Their life on the other side of the world would have been immensely appealing to the young American and his bride. In the years following World War I, Hong Kong held a leadership position in world trade -- its harbors were filled with thousands of vessels -- steamers, sampans, junks and every kind of mechanized ocean vessel. Then, 1 4 as today, the U.S. represented its main export market. It was here that Marguerite was born on September 3, 1920. 20 Hong Kong would have proved exciting for any young couple, but it was especially so for Marguerite's adven- turous parents . She, herself, always took pleasure in mentioning her birthplace, dropping the fact of her birth in that exotic port into copy or conversation, reinforcing her own self-image of uniqueness. Others, too, in writing about her, seemed drawn to the fact. 21 In her autobiography, for example, Marguerite said her sense of being different came from, among other things, her "bizarre Irish-French Hong Kong heritage." 22 What she meant by that is not clear, but she apparently liked the phrase and found it useful. For the Higginses, Hong Kong would not be a perm­ anent home. Crowding, health and sanitation problems abounded. Marguerite, as a six-months old infant, con­ tracted malaria and was taken to Dalat in the central provinces of what was then French Indo-China -- today's . 23 Vietnam -- for recovery. Marguerite's grandfather, Count Georges de Godard, had, in fact, died in Indo-China in the 1880s in the h ·1· 24 service of the Frenc mi itary. Ironically, more than four generations later, after numerous trips throughout the Far East, not to mention the world, 15 Marguerite would die of complications from a similar infection -- contracted most probably in the same part of the world. 25 As a child , Marguerite experienced an American-Asian upbringing, at least for the early years, with European overtones . The Asian portions came from the obligatory amah that Europeans and Ame ricans in Hong Kong hired for • h'ld 26 Th • the care of their c i ren. e counterpoint was provided by repeated returns to an American home on a quiet street in Oakland and by visits to the homes of her mother's sisters in France. Soon after the Higginses returned to Oakland in 1924, Marguerite and her mother went to France to visit her aunts. She came and went between the countries dur ing what must have been a financially and emotionally disruptive period. Not until she was ten did the family stabilize and settle permanently on Chabot Court in Oakland. 27 As a result, however, Marguerite was always cosmopolitan, at home in any place in the world (save, as she once wrote, for some disquieting moments experienced behind the Iron . ) 28 Curtain. Among her first words were Cantonese phrases , spoken 29 in exchange with the amah. Photographs of the two present an interesting contrast. The Oriental arnah is strong, seemingly patient; Marguerite , blonde , blue-eyed, a porcelain-featured princess. In image alone, such 16 photographs suggest a link between East and Wes t , a link 30 she would always claim for her own. That association may have been influential in developing Marguerite's attraction to reporting and interpreting foreign affairs. The few Cantonese phrases Marguerite knew are apparently the basis for a fluency in Chinese incorrectly 31 attributed to her. To be sure, she did little to correct the record. It would always be an assistance for the image she cultivated of the widely traveled, multi-lingual versatile reporter. what would prove much more valuable, and in some ways most influential in her early successes, was her fluency in French. She described the language used at home as ... a Higgins home brew of classic French, soldier French, and French-accented English, a mixture that acc~~odated respectively my mother, father and me. As a result of these language shifts, it would be many years before she felt comfortable in the English language's idiosyncrasies. She said, ... it took a long time for me to feel even slightly comfortable in the English idiom, so very long that I have been envious of those who learned the style and strength of the language via the comparatively painless process of absorpti~~ avail­ able to a child in a cultured environment. Each parent strove to outdo the other in providing everything they believed essential for Marguerite's ultimate happiness and success, since as their only 17 . . l 34 c hild, she was very specia. Yet she herself felt h 1 k . 35 muc was acing. After the family returned from Hong Kong to the house in Oakland at 5833 Chabot Court in the fall of 19 24, her f ather e ntered the investment business, trading in stocks and bonds. As well as be ing Marguerite's life-long hero , Larry Higgins was also her financial advisor and putting his special expertise to work, throughout her life provided her with periodic counsel and reports on her investments. 36 The impact of Marguerite's father on her life was immeasurable. She accepted his leadership and treasured their relationship. Lines from her juvenile biography, Jessie Benton Fremont, could just as easily describe her own childhood and her relationship with her father: If her father seemed indulgent toward Jessie, it was because he saw in her qualities of his own. She was curious about the "whole world, frank and fearless beyond her years ... Jessie became the special charge of her father. She preferred his company, and he in turn realized that a child so independent­ minded and strong-willed needed a f~ 7m guiding hand. He spent many hours as her teacher. Furthermore, one can also look beyond the description Marguerite gives of Jessie's school report to see that there was a likeness between herself and her heroine: Miss Jessie, although extremely intelligent, lacks the docility of a model student. Moreover, she has the objectionable manner of seeming to take our orders and assignments under consideration to be acce~Sed or discarded by some standards of her own. 18 The account might recall Marguerite's own behavior as a girl in the exclusive Anna Head's School where she was sent and mixed a near-perfect academic performance with some questionable deportment, apparently stemming from d h . h .. k 39 pranks an ig Jin s. Marguerite, shuttling between two continents, may have found Oakland somewhat colorless by comparison, seeming t o share Gertrude Stein 's report that "When you get there, there's no there there." For when she described Oakland in her autobiography, much to the d f . d 40 . dismay of family an rien s, it was as a decidedly middle-class neighborhood. "Genteel poverty," she said, was the lot of her Oakland neighbors. 41 She concluded that her neighbors relied on a "genteel morality " in order to have some grounds for feeling superior to those who broke from the norm. She said with obvious disdain, ... our standardized community with its neat little rows of lawns and neat little rows of people, where women worried about their husbands ' jobs and men worried about insurance and very few understood anything about the human close~ess and ~agnif~cence of character that danger sometimes provides . Obviously, Marguerite Higgins of Oakland's Chabot court chose to believe that her life was to break from this norm and that the ambitions she harbored would be f ulfilled. she had little tolerance or admiration for those who might choose conformity. 19 Marguerite's family, especially her mother, and, understandably, the neighbors, were hurt by Marguerite's public assessment. In their view, the neighbors were largely quite successful. Many professional families lived in the Chabot Court cul de sac. Among them, for example, were the families of an attorney, a retired military officer, and two corporate executives, in addition to Marguerite's stockbroker father. 43 For their part, the neighbors held the Higginses in high esteem and were particularly proud of Marguerite's later successes. Despite Marguerite's scorn, she kept friend­ ships made there for the rest of her life. 44 As an example, one of Marguerite's Berkeley sorority sisters who knew her from Chabot Court days noted that her description of the neighborhood was highly inaccu­ rate, as was, in her view, the overall account of the community and the opportunities afforded Marguerite in those Depression days. Marguerite, she said, "had had many advantages in being sent to a superior high school and was in a sorority at a prestigious college ... she was definitely not deprived. It is always difficult to discern the actual degree of deprivation someone might feel. Those who knew Marguerite well confirm that she did indeed feel real deprivation as a child. 46 Certainly, the times were difficult for many. The Higginses were not alone in 20 having limited resources. By contrast , some of Marguerite's classmates at Anna Head's did come from immense weal th and s ocial prominence. In her auto- biography, for example, she mentions Diana Dollar , of the Dollar Steamship Line family; and Phyllis Hills, of the Hills Bros. Coffee interests, as typical examples among 47 her classmates. I n fact, although they were class- mates, "typical" they were not. Others of Marguerite's classmates s aw the Do l lar and Hills girls as special -- they would have been anywhere. She too had to be aware of the "spe cialness" about them, as she was certainly s e nsitive, even years later, to their exis tence. In addition, Marguerite would not have been adverse to using the deprivation angle in her story, for the tale tells bette r when the deprived child in small-town America is catapulted into world fame and great good fortune. Marguerite's friendship with the neighboring Craig family in Oakland was, in fact, life long. 48 Neve rtheless, in her autobiography she chose to de scribe not friendships or pleasures she knew from Chabot Court, but strife and grief. She told, for example, of how Jean Craig had engineered neighborhood children to taunt her, as children are wont to do, with rhymes and cries of "dirty Chink," and "dirty Chinese," referring to Margue rite ' s Hong Kong birth, and also reflecting some of the active prejudices on the West Coast at the time. 49 21 Other friends remember Marguerite's parents as being concerned about her welfare, being genuinely plea s ed to have her bring friends home and generally caring. Jean Stock Kelly , a chum from Anna Head's and Berkeley, said Marguerite's mother was a "lovely person who wanted everything good for her daughter . " 50 Marguerite's mother and father thought she had unique promise and reminded her frequently of their high aspirations for her. There were times when Marguerite found this a burden and somewhat unfair. As soon as one objective that had been set for her had been reached, it seemed as though the bar was raised again. It might have been for better grades, improved performance, or whatever . th . 51 she was engaged in at e time. For Mrs. Higgins, nothing short of absolute excel- • ld b • 52 lence from Marguerite wou e permitted. It was a given. And for Marguerite, she wanted the best of everything for the gifted child, despite the fact that the family resources were modest. In a child of lesser abilities, the disparity between the dream and the reality might have been dis- astrous. Instead, the ambition and expectation of success were effectively passed on to Marguerite. She developed a driving, demanding personality, which in the beginning was inwardly directed, but later outwardly, and 22 which became a force to seriously reckon with in adult competitive situations. Her mother, seeking the very best education possi­ ble, chose the exclusive Anna Head School for Girls in Oakland as appropriate for Marguerite. The costs, clearly beyond the family's means, did not deter Mrs. Higgins, who then taught French and piano so that Marguerite would also have ballet and music lessons. For Marguerite's part, she was to earn her share by winning scholarships. 53 Just short of her tenth birthday, Marguerite entered the sixth grade at Anna Head's, just as Mrs. Higgins had wanted. It was 1930. 54 with academic scholarships rewarding Marguerite's ability and her mother's teaching efforts providing additional income, the family was able to afford an excellent, somewhat exclusive, education for her. On the other hand, Marguerite would never forget the gruelling discipline demanded of her in these days, as she saw it, by her mother. Though her father shared the high expectations, it is her mother who was mentioned with resentment. The two were often at odds, not realizing that, as one childhood friend believed, Marguerite was actually fighting for her father's love and attention, and her mother was the unfortunate victim in the 55 fray. 23 Friends and neighbors felt that Marguerite's charac­ terization of her mother was undu ly harsh in her auto- b • h 56 iograp y. One suggested that Mrs. Higgins was always grieved by the account Marguerite gave of their lives . Mrs. Higgins saw herself as a woman devoted to her family, intent on making whatever sacrifices seemed necessary for the family's welfare. For her, Larry Higgins and Marguerite occupied the center of any world of importance. Marguerite, strong willed and independent, was unbending, even in youth. 57 At Anna Head School, Marguerite maintained the necessary scholarships with straight As, supplemented by, as she put it, the "less than A performance in deportment.," largely stemming from classroom capers 58 growing out of boredom. Marguerite claimed to be a "professional bookworm," and commented about those experiences and their effects: ... Despite occasional lapses in my self-imposed discipline, I obviously had a strong competitive drive instilled in me very early. In newspaper work fear of the second best clearly serves as a powerful prod. The emotional intensity and exertion com­ pelled by this drive ~ertainly serves to make impossible, at least in my case, what the psycholo­ gists call a stable personality, or what is known as serenity. One can become very weary of tension. Yet being afraid is seldom boring. And this affords adv3~tages to those who prefer excitement to safe­ ty. At Anna Head's the emphasis for most students was on athletics. Only a few of the girls had boyfriends though most, according to her friends' recollections today, were 24 interested. 60 The majority were preoccupied with field hockey, tennis or swimming. Competition, Marguerite's classmates recall, was not nearly as important to them as Marguerite's autobiography reflects. Another interesting perception is that Marguerite's classmates do not recall . . . 61 her as even being competitive. Marguerite reported, however, that it was an extremely competitive environment, and she thought she had to do battle to the utmost to stay on top. Her yearbook entry shows the beginning of her response: President of Athletic Association, President of Block "H" Society, 1936; Girl Reserves, Dramatic Club, Life Saving Corps, Glee Club, Athletic Coun­ cil, Soph Editor of "Nod s and Becks," Swimming Captain, All-St~r ~ockey, Vo~~eyball, Basketball, Baseball and Swimming Teams. Her classmates today remember her as having been a tall, thin blonde with lovely blue eyes and a whispery voice. Most thought she was probably very protected. One friend from Anna Head's recal ls that Marguerite's reactions to girl talk about sex was so naive that most f . . . 63 believed she was eigning ignorance. In retrospect, the classmate thinks Marguerite's parents probably did not tell her anything, 64 and information on sex was not handily available to young­ sters in general in the mid-Thirties. Inconsistencies abound. By contrast, Anne Duhring Cooper, another friend from the period, reports, "We were very innocent in high school ... Marge sometimes came up with what we thought 25 were very worldly ideas." If Marguerite sensed that she may not have been as knowledgeable as others her age, she would not b e at that disadvantage for long. Mrs. Cooper recalls an instance when they were on a Girls Rese rves outing, a high school YWCA activity. Marguerite reportedly s urprised the group in the middle of a midnight gab fest by asking how many of them had "gone the limit." Mrs. Cooper reports they were all struck absolutely dumb at the thought. Moreover , she believes Marguerite enjoyed the ensuing confusion immensely. 65 Marguerite, from earliest days, in contrast to her feelings of inadequacy and need for competitive vie- tories, showed consistent signs of leadership. She wa s reportedly well liked in her high-school years, though she saw herself as a grind, and engaged in activities not calculated to "inspire popularity." She was an excellent student, a star athlete and was involved in widely varying student activities including writing for Nods and Becks, the school's yearbook. Her sensitivity to being a "scholarship student" was not evident to those around her, nor was her feeling of social inadequacy. Though she described herself as a "financial misfit" at the schoo1, 66 most of her classmates were surprised to learn of it later. Classmates are also fairly uniform in their surprise at her demeaning ''middle-income families " , for most thought her circumstances, and theirs, were 26 particularly fortunate in light of the fact that the country in the mid-Thirties was still reeling from the Depression. Anne Duhring Cooper reports that Marguerite gave as her stated "ambition" in the graduating seniors "Horoscope" section of the yearbook her intention to become a drama critic. For the "probable end" that students were required to identify, she conjectured that she would actually be a "court reporter," one o f the earliest statements that Marguerite made, though wryly, . . . 1 · 67 of ambitions in JOurna ism. Like many other concerned students following the Depression, she prepared herself , not for a glamorous career in an unknown future, but simply for a job. To Marguerite, a job with the most security appeared to be to teach French. She would consider it a living rather than life's fulfillment. Journalism at the time presented a world of vast excitement. In the aftermath of the war's outbreak in 1914, editors nationwide focused on happenings abroad. Correcting the dearth of earlier coverage, the Thirties saw foreign news featured in newspapers nationwide. 6 8 Despite the enormous expense of coverage, floods in China and the Japanese conquest of Manchuria made the pages of United States' dailies, and outstanding reporting achievements were realized by the U.S. press abroa d. 27 Notable particularly were correspondents Richard Harding Davis, who wrote dramatically of the German army entering Brussels, Will Irwin's stories on the battle of Ypres, and Frank H. Simonds' work as a military critic f or the New York Tribune. 69 In 1933 , U.S. readers were given account's of Hitler 's coup in Germany, and two years later, Italy's • Ab • • 7o S f Am • ' f. war in y s sinia. ome o erica s inest report- ers, including Ernest Hemingway and Robert Capa, were on the scene when t he Spanish Civil War erupted in 1936, bringing facts and photographs to newspaper r eaders. 70 Marguerite was a member o f that reading public, and these reporters were larger-than-life figures to her. In a 71 real sense, they were her heroes. She was later to witness Capa's death dramatically in another place, another war. 7 2 The Spanish Civil War was particularly diffi cult and dangerous to cover. Censorship was stringent. During the same period, American readers had reports of the undeclared war between China and Japan. Many other journalists writing in these stri fe -packed areas became familiar to readers through their by-lines. 73 Best known were Fred S. Ferguson of the United Press for his coverage of the battle of Saint-Mihiel, Webb Miller, also of the United Press; Edwin L. James of The New York Times, Martin Green of the New York World; Junius Wood of 28 t h e Chicago Daily News, and Floyd Gibbons of the Chicago Tribune . 74 In addition, although they were few in number, wome n c o rre spondents were unde rtaking dangerous assignments. Pe ggy Hul l , f or example, was particularly well known for the time. 75 Her earlier experience s preceded Marguerite's by a number of years, and it is possible that Ma r guerite as a young woman wa s aware of her as a reporter. Hull was openly resented by male report- 76 • th • t b. . ers. Despite eir s renuous o Jections and com- plaints to Army officials, Hull went on to visit American camps and cove r the news. Setting a pattern that Marguerite would follow years later, she had no problem sleeping on the ground with other correspondents and among the troops themselves when quarters were not available. 77 Though few in number, women reporters were following a long tradition. Examples include d Rheta Childe Dorr, actively reporting wars long before Marguerite was born. 78 Anne O'Hare McCormick might have represented a role model for her. McCormick, while not a combat correspondent, was a prominent woman journalist of the period well known for her trenchant political commentary. 79 McCormick was also the first practicing woman reporter to win a Pulitzer Prize in journalism, a fact which led John Hohenberg, long secretary of the 29 Pulitzer Prize Committee to note in his history of the Prizes that, She became the first woman journalist to receive such an award. It says something about the status of women in the newspapers of the era when the editors and publishers of the advisory board let twenty years elapse before honoring one of their own, although they had not hesitated from the outset to bestow Psbzes on women authors, poets and dramatists. Other noteworthy women reporters who could in all liklihood have come to Marguerite's attention include Mary Margaret McBride, a newspaperwoman who later . b d • 81 pioneered radio roa casting; Agness Underwood, formidable Los Angeles Evening Herald-Express journalist; 82 Dorothy Thompson, to whom Marguerite referred as a role model while at Columbia; 83 Sigrid Schultz, Chicago Tribune overseas bureau chief; 84 Martha Gellhorn, who covered the Spanish Civil War and d 85 f • • 86 many others afterwar s; erninist May Craig; with whom Marguerite would later share television coverage, Ruth Finney, Sylvia Porter and Dorothy Kilgallen. 87 Footnotes: Chapter One 1. Autobiography portion of Marguerite Higgins 's Application for Admission to Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism, September 1941. 2. James Trager, The People's Chronology: A Year-by ­ Year Record of Human Events from Prehistory to the Present (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1979), p. 799. 3 . Ibid ., p. 800. 4. Interviews with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979; Lt. Gen. William E. Hall, U.S.A.F., Ret., February 26, 1973; and letter to the author from Jean Stock Kelly, May 20, 1975. 5 . Ibid. 6. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1975; letter to the author from Anne Duhring Cooper, March 24, 1980; and Marguerite Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing (New York: Double day & Co., 1955), p. 26. 7. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 27. 8. Death Certificate No. 6005, Lawrence Daniel Higgins State of California Department of Public Health, ' November 30, 1964. 9. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 26. 10. Interviews with Gen. Hall, February 26, 1973; and Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. 11. Ibid. 12. Ibid. 13. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. 14. Interview with Gen. Hall, February 26, 1973. 15. Marshall Fishwick, The Hero, American Style (New York: David McKay Company, Inc., 1969), p. 6. 16. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 34. 1 7. Ibid. 18 . Ibid. 19. Official Transcript of Application for Admission for ..30 31 Lawrence Daniel Higgins to the University of California, Berkeley, August 27, 1915. 20. Autobiogr aphy portion of Marguerite Higgins's Application to Columbia University. 21. Carl Mydans, "Girl Correspondent," Life, October 2, 1950, p. 51. 22. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 36. 23. Autobiography portion of Marguerite Higgins's Application to Columbia University. 24. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 33. 25. Obituary, Marguerite Higgins, The Washington star, January 4, 1966. 26. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 35. 27. Autobiography; Application for Admission to Columbia. 28. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 115. 2 9. Ibid. , p. 3 5. 30. Scrapbooks, Marguerite Higgins Papers, George Arents Research Library, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York. 31. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 35. 32. Ibid., p. 36. 33. Ibid. 34. Interview with Gen. Hall, February 26, 1973. 35. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 39. 36. Autobiography; Application for Admission to Columbia. 37. Marguerite Higgins, Jessie Benton Fremont (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1962), p. 13. 38. Ibid., pp.34-34. 39. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 39. 32 40. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 19 79 ; and Gen. Hall, February 26, 1973. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 27. Ibid. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. Ibid. Letter to the author from Marjorie Barker Malmquist (Mrs. Lincoln C. Malmquist), October 28, 1979. Interviews with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979; and Gen. Hall, February 26, 1973. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, pp. 38-39. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5 1979 , . Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 37. Letter to the author from Jean Stock Kelly, May 20, 1975. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 38. Ibid. Ibid. Marguerite Higgins's Application for Admission to the University of California, Berkeley, June 29, 1937. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. Ibid. Ibid. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 39. Ibid. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 197 91 and letter to the author from Jean Stock Kelly, May 20, 1975. 61. Letter to the author from Jean Stock Kelly, May 20 , 1979. 33 62. 1937 Nods and Becks, Yearbook for the Anna Head School for Girls, p. 13. 63. Letter to the author, Jean Kelly Stock, May 20, 1975. 64. Ibid. 65. Letter to the author from Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. 66. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 38. 67. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 16. 68. Frank Luther Mott, American Journalism: A History of Newspapers in the United States Through 250 Years: 1690 to 1940 (New York: The MacMillan Company, 1941), p. 705. 69. Edwin Emery, The Press and Arne~ica: An Interpre­ tative History of the Mass Media (Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1972), pp. 518-519. 70. Ibid. 71. Autobiography, Application to Columbia University. 72. Marguerite Higgins, Our Vietnam Nightmare (New York: Harper and Row, 1965), p. 2. 73. Mott, American Journalism, p. 705. 74. Emery, The Press and America, p. 519. 75. Marion Marzolf, Up From the Footnote: A History of women Journalists (New York: Hastings House, 1977), p. 44. 76. Ibid. 77. Ibid. 78. Ibid., p. 45. 79. Ibid. , p. 46. 80 . John Hohenberg, The Pulitzer Pr~zes: A History of the Awards in Books, Drama , Music, and Journalism Based on the Private Files Over Six Decades (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974), p. 132. 34 81. Marzolf, Up From the Footnote, p. 48. 82. Ibid., p. 53. 83. Ibid., p. 54; John Chamberlain, "Marguerite Higgins: The Good Die Young," Kankakee Daily Journal, January 11, 1966. 84. Marzolf, Up From the Footnote, p. 54. 85. Ibid. 86. Meet the Press Transcript of December 13, 1953, Lawrence Spivak Papers, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 87. Marzolf, Up From the Footnote, p. 54. II. BERKELEY : THE MAKINGS OF A J OURNALIST On J une 29, 1937, Marguerite Hi ggins graduated from Anna Head' s Schoo l. She was sixteen . Her picture in the local newspapers is o f a be aut iful girl among graduating seniors, grace f u l i n a long white dre ss, sereni ty itself , ho lding a bouque t a s a de butan t e at a ny good fin i s hing h 1 . h 1 SC 00 m1g t . For Ma r g ueri t e and mos t of he r friends at Anna Head' s , the mos t i mportant obj e ctive s were t o g e t into c olle ge , join a sorority, and a s one of her f riends s a id, 2 t o meet some boys. Marguerite a pp l ied to the Univer- sity o f California, Berkele y, at the end of June, as did a numbe r o f f riends f r om the school. She had c ompleted four years of French and English, two of Latin and history, and a year each o f algebra, geometry, chemistry, p hysics and German. She wa s admitted to Berkeley's School of Le tters and Science, a ma j or in languages, in August. 3 She wrote little about her colle ge experie nces at Be rke ley e xce pt to say tha t funds were short and in the process o f obtaining an education she lear ne d how to survive financially through study. By this, she meant she learned the fine art of winning scholarships and a wa rds. 4 Perhaps because she was away from home, or b e cause there were many dis t ractions for Marguerite at Berkeley , li fe wa s not the grinding effort for schola rships t ha t 35 36 Anna He ad's had been. Expenses we re always critical, although tuition, room and board and miscellaneous e xpense s could be covered then for as little as $300 a year for a state resident. 5 Later on, in her applica­ tion for admission to Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism, Marguerite's Berkeley experience proved a strong recommendation for her maturity and dedication: "I was a good student and had an A average in high school. After my graduation from Anna Head in June 1937, I was fortunate enough to receive a scholar- ' ship to the University of California. In addition to the part-time jobs during the college semesters, I also worked Christmas and summer vacations. In this way, 6I became self-supporting while a college student." Expenses f or living in a sorority house were manage­ able, although Marguerite would not remain actively involved with the Gamma Phi Beta house as her interests extended, particularly in the realm of social and politi- cal activism. The former straight-A student was suffi- ciently involved in college activities for her grades to slip to a mixture of As, Bs and a occasional C, although she did graduate cum laude in 1941. 7 And while she seldom wrote of campus experiences otherwise , she often made reference to the cum laude designation, with obvious ' d 8 relish and great pr1 e . She and a friend from Anna Head's, Jean Kelly, went the ir separate ways in college, each joining different sororities. Jean Kelly Stock relates that other 37 differences between Marguerite and her contemporaries were emerging in this period. Even though their preparatory school days of writing for Anna Head's Nods and Becks were past, she relates, each applied in her freshman year for the same job -- a summer position at Yosemite; both were excited when they were accepted. By then , however, Jean Kelly's mother came to the conclusion that Marguerite's maturity outstripped Jean's, based on a conversation she overheard between the two girls. Marguerite reportedly insisted on the advantages of sexual experimentation, arguing, "You wouldn't buy a horse without riding him, would you?" Whether Marguerite said this for mere shock value or because Margueri te sincerely believed the analogy valid is not clear. In any case, Mrs. Kelly refused to allow Jean to accompany her one-time chum to Yosemite for the summer. 9 Although Marguerite joined Gamma Phi Beta, a social sorority on the Berkeley campus, she chose not to list her membership in her later application to graduate school.lo And despite Marguerite's later worldwide fame, the sorority apparently never featured her in any of its alumnae publications, according to its current 1 . t 11 a umnae coordina or. In general, Marguerite was never a joiner. Her membership affiliations were few and usually served a practical purpose, even in later life. More serious for her age than other 17-year-olds, she was 38 apparently more intensely interested in campus poli­ tics. 12 With the independence she was to show throughout he r life, she took to the informal campus speech circuit, speaking on issues of importance to her. One of these was the right of Communist speakers to be heard on campus. Never shy or reticent about her beliefs, she made impassioned speeches at the campus's Sather Gate on Telegraph Road -- practically, as some of her friends say, on a soap box side by side with students seen then as b . . d. l 13 eing quite ra ica. The sorority sisters increasingly thought her actions unbecoming and took it upon themselves to discipline her. Marguerite never received criticism lightly, though there would be plenty in her life. When disapproval of her behavior failed, the sorority employed ostracism. 14 But ostracism was not as effective a tool as it might have been. Marguerite sought more approval from her father than from any of her friends, and his loyalty was always with her, whatever the cause she embraced. In this case, he made it a special point to be supportive and thus mitigated the sorority's effectiveness in bringing her in check. Her collegiate objectives grad­ ually evolved beyond the social orientation of a post­ Depression sorority girl to the political orientation of a campus political activist . She clearly wished both 39 world s , but, as in later life , she could be exp e cted to choose with consis tency political powe r over socia l acceptance. One sorority siste r thought Margue r i t e "a ge neration ahe ad of her time." The rest of those who k ne w her we re much more interested in conforming; she was "clearly quite radical. 1115 Berkeley's journalism program had begun the year be f ore Marguerite entered. However, Marguerite did not enroll in any journalism classe s, at least in he r fresh- 16 man year. A French major, her program was full, and her objective was to be able to get a job after grad­ uation. 17 Her ideas about a career were amorphous at the time, although once she began newspaper work, no other career appealed. Like others on campus who were interested in the college newspaper, she signed up as a freshman to work on Berkeley's The Daily Californian. She had enjoyed working on school publications at Anna Head's, and the transition probably seemed quite natural. Anne Duhring, her friend from Head's, also joined the staff. 18 The competition was demanding, and frequent staff cuts kept everyone on their toes as they fought for coveted soph­ omore, junior and senior editorial staff appointments. Marguerite described herself making "a bee-line to~ Daily californian 19 in her determination to take a shot 20 at "running the newspaper." Anne Duhring Cooper 40 recalls that "Margue rite was very serious about it, from th b . . ..21 e eginning. Later, as upperclassmen, "the rest of us would try to figure out 'what made Marge run' -- she seemed to have a compelling need to stay ahead of the group, and worked herself ragged to excel ••• 1122 Marguerite was always quick to learn what it took to produce a winning performance. In an English class she and Anne Duhring took, the professor found great merit in Anne's use of recurring symbolism to illustrate the point she was making. The next week's "best paper," was, according to Mrs. Cooper, "building around an adaptation of the same device. It was Marge's. 1123 Such are the first obvious, overtly competitive actions attributable to Marguerite. Although she had felt keen competition at Anna Head's, and her behavior at the school in her own eyes had been extremely competitive, she had apparently not been viewed by her classmates as aggressive. 24 However, at Berkeley, many of the same friends generally agreed her competitiveness and aggressiveness were carried to a point of questionable taste. As Mrs. Cooper recounts these performances, Time and again, it seemed that Marge's single minded pursuit of a story b~i~d~d_her to the territorial assignments and sensitivities of her fellow report­ ers. There would be cries for her scalp, and she would be scolded, and_repentan25 and it would quiet down until the next time ••• This driving competitive instinct would characterize Marguerite's work throughout her career. It would elicit 41 comment b y admirers a nd critics, f ans and competitors , favo r a b le a nd unfavo r able, most o f whom would fi nd i t entirely predictable. Newsma n and war corre spondent Edmund Ant robus was a t Berkeley at t he s ame t ime as Marguerite. The fr iend o f one of Ma r gueri t e 's beaux , Antrobus recalls tha t s he seeme d t o posses s d r ive and ambition, his assessment because she intently sought advice about he r wri ting f rom t hei r mutual f r iend, though Antrobus knew of no special knowled ge the fri e nd had. 26 In t he first p a ragraph of News Is a Singular Thing, Ma rguerite wrote that, in addition to being a twenty­ year-old girl fresh out o f college, s he also possessed what she c a lle d "the dubious merit of having e dite d a 2 7 c o lle ge newspaper." That was stretching the facts somewhat . Technica l ly, Marguerite was not the editor of her college newspaper; she was one of five associate e ditors on the Daily Cal, 28 al t hough each of them d i d take a we e kly turn at being the night e ditor, a point noteworthy only because Marguerite throughout he r life stretched the facts to create impressions that put her at an advantage over others, sometime s much to annoyance o f the knowing. The comment that she had "edited a college newspaper" as though she had been the editor is particularly characteristic of Marguerite. It provides an i mportant perspective in assessing her accounts of 42 herself. Marguerite's interpretation of what happened in her life is her interpretation; often it may simply present the facts in such a way that a reader might easily jump to an incorrect conclusion. If Marguerite was misleading when she wrote about herself, it may be because the reader has not read carefully enough . On the other hand, it is e ntirely possible, and in some cases, quite likely, that Marguerite may have intentionally misled . Her copy, when she wanted it to be, was lucid ' sparkling and accurate. Clearly, she intended the reader to assume she had a role on the Daily Cal which, in fact, she did not have. She would not have been as unclear reporting some one else's role in perhaps one of her own stories. These early years at Berkeley are particularly significant in her professional development, for it was here for the first time that Marguerite's actions caused her to be disliked. This was a significant change. Because not only was she disliked, but she was aware she was doing things that made her disliked, and in a seeming new independence of spirit, she deviated not a whit from her practices. Indeed, on entering Berkeley she began to exhibit a whole new set of behavior patterns. She did what she felt was important for her to do, regardless of what others thought, and she in no way camouflaged her 43 motives. That turned out to be very difficult for many of her peers to accept. Conformity went by the wayside. 29 Communication between Marguerite and the Beta Gamma Phi sorority sisters deteriorated, particularly after the freshmen year when she dropped out Of th I • • • 30 e groups act1v1t1es . The parting may have been mutually agreeable, however, for her grooming, by some accounts, had gone to pieces. She, friends report, looked sloppy and somewhat unkempt, racing about the campus with uncombed hair and oblivious to the standards . 31 expected by her college contemporaries. She became heatedly involved in political causes, particularly those with a Marxist bent, just as many other sensitive and idealistic people at the time were In this era arising out of the Depression, there doing. were large numbers of very rational people looking for a new form of society that could provide an assurance for better living for everyone. Marguerite embraced these causes and spoke her piece wherever she could. 32 When Marguerite started out at The Daily Californian, her first job would have been as a "proof," or proofreader, as lower classmen traditionally start­ ed. 3 3 From time to time, the Daily Cal restructured itself as far as financing and control were concerned. Sometimes it functioned entirely independent of the school; sometimes it was sponsored by the Journalism 44 Department; sometimes it received partial support from the Associated Students of the University of Cali f ornia (ASUC). But its independence and freedom had always bee n jealously guarded. At the time that Marguerite joined the staff, it was strictly a student production. The sta f f, quite formally structured, rewarded high perfor- mance with select assignments and, in the students' senior year, with editorships appropriate to perfor­ mance. 34 Basically, freshmen, as lower classmen, tradition- ally read proof. Juniors supervised "beats" with lower classmen under them. And, in addition, juniors also served regularly on the night staff. At the top of the paper's hierachy were the seniors who made up the board -- the editor, managing editor, assistant editor and five associate editors. These were the coveted spots, and the staffers competed fiercely for the honor of serving on th . b d • 35 is oar as seniors. Marguerite's work on the Daily Cal was in addition to her sorority and campus political activities. Her schedule was a fairly reasonable one, usually made up of a fifteen to sixteen credit-hour program. Since her major was French, and it was the language she spoke fluently from childhood, she had a natural advantage in those classes. A Berkeley colleague who later went on to become a war correspondent himself, and who says that 45 "those of us who had known or known of her in school, were conscious of her success and I suspe ct envious," expresse d another annoyance that others probably shared: "One or both of Marguerite's parents were French, and I was told, she spoke French at home. That she made French her college major struck us super­ critical, ultra-idea1~stic critics as foul ball. Why not journalism?" In addition, when Marguerite was interested in mastering information on any subject, she had the ability to do so in very short order, approaching the subject with intensity and applying her intellect with perserver­ ance and drive. Her schedule, in fact, easily allowed time for her studies, the paper, politics, and the social 37 life she sought. In her four years at Berkeley, Marguerite registered for only one journalism course, and • 38 H f that was in her senior year. er per ormance demon- strated no special promise; she earned a undistinguished c. 39 As she would in later years, Marguerite saw herself as restless, impatient and given to taking things too hard, traits she pointed out are attributed by . . t 40 psychiatrists to 1nsecur1 y. When the Daily Cal eliminated the "women's editor" slot in 1940, the action was seen as a quite a break­ through for women on the paper. Nevertheless, when the appointments for that year's slots were announced Marguerite's senior year -- she lost out to three other women for the best positions. She was, however, named 46 one of the five associate editors and, as such, occasion­ ally served as night editor, putting the paper to bed. 41 By her senior year, she was also writing a column called "The Ins and Outs," which dealt mainly with foreign affairs. Typical articles included defense of the right of communists to speak on campus, so long as they remained within the law, a then debated draft bill, and the wisdom of selling steel to Japan . 42 By the spring of her senior year, she appeared in the Daily Cal's masthead as the paper's rewrite editor, a job she created for herself, according to Michael Emery, then a graduate student at Berkeley. Once she graduated, no one followed her as "rewrite editor." 43 The late Bruce Lee , assistant city editor with the Redwood City Tribune and long with the San Francisco Chronicle, was a staffer on the Daily Cal with Marguerite, and a member of the 1940 graduation class. Lee was also sports editor in his senior year, and thus a member of the board with Marguerite. Lee liked to report that he had pushed for Marguerite's dismissal from the board . Probably, he thought in retrospect, it was because he felt she had more extracurricular activities than could be handled simultaneously with responsibil­ ities on the Daily Cal . Lee described himself in those days at Berkeley as "a dedicated, 100-percent- 47 of-the-time-and-effort type," who would have found Marguerite's interest in things extraneous to the paper unacceptable. In later years, he liked to say, though it was hardly true, that he was "probably the only newspaper editor in history who wanted to fire a Pulitzer Prize winner." 44 Years later, when the memory of his at­ tempted ouster of Marguerite was dim, he recalled she was a warm, friendly person, a popular and attractive girl on campus. He was flattered when she remembered him at a 45 crowded gathering many years later. Marguerite's academic program at Berkeley included her French major, history, economics, and political science as well as art and music. In addition, she signed up for philosophy courses each semester in her 46 sophomore, junior and senior years. Stanley Moore was a teaching assistant and section leader in Berkeley's philosophy department. Considered by some of Marguerite's colleagues to be "quite polit­ ically far out," Stanley Moore no doubt attracted Marguerite for a number of reasons, but one seems espe­ cially probable. Throughout Marguerite's life, she was drawn to people in positions of power and authority. This was particularly true of men, who, by and large, occupy those places. But in addition to Stanley Moore's position as a young professor, an authority figure or leader in the classroom, he represented something else 48 that Marguerite valued -- social acceptance. Moore was the son of a wealthy and socially prominent family, and as such, provided a means for her to shed some sense of being t he "freak ," or the di ffe rent sort she often describes herself as being in the early years . Six years older than Marguerite, Stanley Moore was I making a name for himself as a promising young academi­ cian. He was awarded the Sutton Fellowship at Berkeley in 1939 -- a time when Marguerite held the University's La Verne Noyes and Irene Purington Scholarships, both of which rewarded competitive academic performance. 47 Moore received his Ph.D. in philosophy from Berkeley in 1940, and Marguerite graduated the following year with a bachelor's degree in French. By the fall of 1941, Marguerite, unable to find a full-time newspaper job in New York, had enrolled in Columbia's Graduate School of J 1 . 48 ourna ism. Moore, meantime, joined the faculty of Harvard university as an instructor and tutor in philo­ sophy. 49 According to Moore, they met initially while she was a student of his in a philosophy section at Berkeley.so They were acquaintances with mutual friends and sometimes encountered each other socially until he left for Harvard in the fall of 1940. Meeting him by chance on a Berkeley street the following summer, she told him of her plans to e nter Columbia in the fall, and they arranged to get 49 together. Moore also c onfirms that shortly after her arrival in New York they did meet, became lovers, and continued to see each other until he joined the Army in 1942 . 51 They were married on November 20, 1942, at St. Clement's Church, an Episcopalian chapel near the Berkeley campus, and the site of fashionable campus marriages of the time, according to Marguerite's friend, Jean Craig Clack, who attended the wedding. 52 Marguerite's parents were deeply disappointed that it was not a Catholic wedding. Nevertheless, they were present at the ceremony. The Moores were socially prominent in the San Francisco Piedmont area, and a reception for the newlyweds was held at their home following the st. 53 Clements' ceremony. After a Carmel honeymoon, Marguerite returned to New York, Stanley Moore to his Texas military post. 54 Subsequently, Moore spent six weeks at the Harvard Business School where he received his commission. He was then stationed in Connecticut until he shipped out for England in August 1943. "During this six-month period r came to New York for most weekends. And we spent some 1 ft .,55 days in Nantucket before I e . It was to be a marriage of short duration. has been written about it. Marguerite made few Little 50 references to it, although she did say in her 1955 auto­ biography that " . My marriage had been a wartime thing and had gone the way of many marriages built on a seven-day honeymoon followed by many years of s eparation. When we marr ied, my husband was on his way to wa r as a draftee, a private first-class. 5 Gn peace-time, he had been a philosophy instructor. It is true that Moore did sign up with the Air Force as the private first-class she described. However, characteristic of Marguerite' s tendency to describe the details of her personal life in what4ever light makes her position most favorable, she fails to mention, though she wri tes he r description from a 1955 perspective, that Moore eventually rose to the rank o f major before completing his tour of duty four years later. 57 In the beginning, there was a likely match between Moore's academic studies, publishing and teaching, and Marguerite's campus activism and aggressiveness. His publications in political philosophy focused on socialism and Marxism. Although he and Marguerite from all indica­ tions appeared to start out compatibly enough, five years would bring a sharp divergence in their points of view. 58 For Marguerite's part, deep and long-lasting im­ pressions would later result from her experiences in post World war II, and she was to become increasingly conser­ vative as she covered political developments in Europe. That conservatism became even more strongly entrenched 51 with her personally frightening e ncounters with t 59 otalitarian governments. She was disturbed by conditions where peoples were closely controlled. Though of liberal persuasion in her college year s , a conserva­ t ive tendency emerged and grew in intensity throughout her life. 60 J ean Craig Clack recalls Marguerite's writing to her from Europe during the Forties, professing her continuing love for Stanley Moore, but also expressing growing reservations about what appeared to be his increasingly socialistic bent. As the separation stretched over the years, reconciliation seemed more and more unlikely. 61 Ke n McCormick, Marguerite's editor later at Doubleday & Company, recalls their marriage as one that couldn't possibly last. He attributed its failure basically to the fact that Moore was a professorial stay-at-home, and . t' 62 Marguerite, by nature, peripate ic. Stanley Moore returned to the U.S. at the war's close, serving for a brief period as a lecturer on the Berkeley campus. Shortly thereafter, he was selected a Rockefeller Foundation Post war Fellow in a special fellowship category set up to provide assistance for those whose studies had been interrupted by the war. He sued Marguerite for divorce in 1947 on grounds of extreme cruelty. 6 3 According to Moore, their separation and eventual divorce was agreed to mutually. They 52 "considered a French divorce but decided it would be too complicated." Moore says that he had been in " friendly consultation with Larry," and the decree became final in 1948. 64 Marguerite's passing explanation of why the marriage did not work is interesting, but sheds little light on the nature of their relationship. By the time she wrote of the distinction between love and admiration and how it related to her relationship with Stanley Moore, as briefly mentioned in her autobiography, she had re­ married, this time choosing a high-ranking Air Force general. She said, " ... although hindsight is admittedly untrust­ worthy, it seemed, looking back, that in my first attempt at matrimony, I had felt admiration and affection but not love. Although my concept of love, like most people's, seems to change with the seasons of life and of the year, I am, for the purposes of this book, speaking of love in the sense of needing someone so much that it is more painful to be without him that it is to be with him (ir­ respective of how much_pain may be attached to being with him). I don't think I ever needed my first husband at all because there was g5ver the time or occasion for the need to develop. 1. 2 . 3. 4 . 5 . 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Footnotes: Chapte r Two Scrapbooks , Margue rite Higgins Papers, Ge orge Arents Rese a rch Library , Syracu se Universi t y , Sy racuse , New York. Le tter t o the author from Jean Kelly Stock (Mrs. John P. St ock), May 20, 1 975. Margueri t e Hi ggin~• s A~pl ica t ion for Admis s ion, Unive r sity of Cal ifornia, Be rke l ey , June 29, 1 937 . Margue rite Hi gg ins, News Is a Singu lar Thing (New York: Doub leday & Co. , Inc ., 195 5 ), p. 23 . Catalogs , Unive rsity o f Ca l i f o r n ia , Berke ley , 1936-1940. Autobiography p o r tion o f Margue rite Hi ggin s's Application fo r Admis sion t o Columbia Univers ity ' s Graduate Sc hool of Jour nalism, Se pte mbe r 1 941. Of ficial Tr ans cript of Re cord for Marguerite Higgins, Unive r sity o f Cali f o r nia, Berke l ey , July 16, 1975. Higgins, News I s a Singular Thing, p. 15 . Lette r to the author, Jean Ke lly Stock, May 20, 1975 . Autobiography, Applicati on t o Columbia . Letter to the author from Mar ge Shupert, Gamma Phi Beta a lumnae coordinator, January 8, 1982. Interview with Lt. Gen. William E. Hall, U.S.A.F., Ret., February 26, 1973. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979· and letter to the author from Ma rjori e Ba rke r ' Malmquist, October 28, 1979. Letter to the author, J e an Kelly Stock, May 20, 1975. Letter to the a uthor, Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. Official Transcript of Record f or Marguerite Higgins, University of California, Berkeley, July 16, 1975. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 16. 18. 54 Letter to the author, Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. 19. Autobiography, Marguerite Higgins's Application to Columbia. 20 . 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. Letter to the author, Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. Ibid. Ibid. Ibid. Letter to the author, Jean Kelly Stock, May 20 1975. Letter to the author, Anne Duhring Cooper, Nove mber 28, 1979. Letter to the author from Edmund Androbus , February 1, 1982. Higgins, News rs a Singular Thing, p. 15. , 27. 28. Letter to the author, Anne Duhring Cooper, March 24 , 1980. 29. Letter to the author, Jean Kelly Stock, May 20, 1975. 30. Ibid. 31. Letters to the author, Jean Kelly Stock, May 20 1975; and Anne Duhring cooper, March 24, 1980. ' 32. Letter to the author, Marjorie Barker Malmquist, October 28, 1979- 33. Letter to the author from Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. 34. Letter to the author from Michael Emery, July 8, 1975. 35. Letter to the author, Anne Duhring Cooper, November 28, 1979. 36. Letter to the author, Edmund Androbus, February 2 , 1982. 55 37. 38. Interview with Ge n. Hall, February 26, 19 73. Official Transcript, University of California, Berkeley, for Marguerite Higgins. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. so. 51. 52. 53. 54. Ibid. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, pp. 21-22. Letter to the author, Michael Emery, July 8, 1975. Ibid. Ibid. Letter to the author from Bruce Lee, July 9, 1975. Ibid. Official Transcript, University of California. University of California catalogs, 1937-1941. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 39. Letter to the author from Stanley Moore, April 19, 1982. Ibid. Ibid. Interview with Jean Craig Clack , December 5, 1979· • I and Divorce Complaint, Stanley W. Moore vs. Marguerite H. Moore, in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Alameda, No. 198745. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. Letter to the author from Stanley Moore, April 29, 1982. Ibid. 55. 56 . 57. 58. Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 39 . Ibid. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. 59. Interview with Peter Lisagor, December 12, 1972. 56 60. Interview with Lt. Gen. William E. Hall, February 26, 1973. 61. Interview with Jean Craig Clack, December 5, 1979. 62. Interview with Kenneth J. McCormick, March 13, 1973. 63. Divorce Complaint, Stanley W. Moore vs. Marguerite H. Moore, in the Superior Court of the State of California , in and for the County of Alameda, No. 1298745. 64. Letter to the author from Stanley Moore, April 29, 1982. 65 . Higgins, News Is a Singular Thing, p. 107. III. READYING FOR THE RACE : CUB REPORTER TO FORE I GN CORRESPONDENT In the summer of 1 941, following graduatio n from Berkeley , Margue ri te went t o work for the s mall (circulation 10,00 0) Va llej o Times-Hera ld in a t own south of San Franc isc o. She was a cub reporter, a job she would later de s cribe as a "summe r of p rocessing c l assified a ds. 111 When he r work in t he classified section was done , she wrote news s t o ries . Some times they were used, with her by-line, to mark he r o fficia l start in j ourna lism. Thi s taste o f " rea l ne wspa pering " made he r eager f or more recognit i on . Ultimate l y , the smal l Valle jo Times -He rald would not be e nough, fo r b y t he n her ambition was to be a r e po rter wi t h a maj or metropolitan daily or, better yet, a f o r e ign correspondent at some 2 e xotic overseas bureau . Journalism would p r ove a more satisfying career to her than the possibility o f a career teaching French, as h db • • 1 • t t 3 At th 1 f h a een her origina in en. e c ose o t e summe r of 1941, Marguerite ma de her way to New York, using the home of relatives in Long Island as a base until she found employment . On arriving in the City, and asking directions to the nearest newspape r, she found the N 'b 4 e w York Herald Triune. In those days, women r e porters we re not in any great demand at the Ne w York Herald Tribune, nor at any other major newspaper. In fact, as a newspaper opening prove d impossible to find throughout the city, Marguerite ha d 58 a pplie d to Columbia Unive r sity's Graduate School o f Journalism for the coming fall. By that t i me of the y ear, it seemed much too late to be granted admission. Dea n Ac ke rman, who was considering her application, doubte d that the admission deadlines could be met. In one of her earliest descriptions of the responsiveness of he r father in s upporting he r efforts, Marguerite tells of c alling him a t home on the West Coast, explaining that the lette rs of recommendation, transcripts and other documentation would be needed within 48 hours. He r father had them sent. She was admitted to Columbia's Journalism School that fall. 5 She described the furious spurt of energy required to gain admission, a step toward attaining her ambition: "By the time I reached New York ••• I told myself that this was very much of a last chance. On graduation from the University of California, I had given myself just one year in which to land a newspaper job. A career in journalism symbolized the epitome of excitement and adventure. Foreign correspondence and national reporting were particularly intriguing, I thought, because they offered the stimulation of being in a perpetual intellectual race against history, one's competitors, and time: the time it takes to meet a deadline and the time required to do the infinite reading and studying that equip you in the quest both for information and for the exercise of sound judgment. I have never lo~t this sense of ex~it~ment about newspapering. If I ever do, I'll quit. Realizing that money was going to be scarce, she returned repeatedly to the Herald Tribune, hoping to win some assignment, however small, on the paper. The only 59 possibil ity -- to be selected a s the Trib's Columbi a campus corre spondent - - had been seized by Murray Morgan, a J-school classmate. Then Time magazine offered Morgan, a n experience d newsman, a job, and he accepted. As soon as Morgan told Marguerite of his good fortune, she made her way t o the Trib, despite Morgan's warnings, "Engel told me he didn't want to hire a woman reporter!" 7 As it turned out, City Editor Lessing Engelking gave her the job despite his preference for a man. Later Engelking was to remark on her competitive nature, fire a nd zea1. 8 She credited such successes, howeve r, to "good fortune:" "It disappoints the youngsters who look for a sure calculated formula for so-called success, but I've always found that when the breaks finally came, it was either through such an accident o9 through the kind of luck that defies all formula. No doubt, Marguerite did consider herself "lucky." More likely, however, would have been her thought that "luck" was the more socially acceptable explanation a woman could offer for success in a traditionally male profession. Certainly, an ambitious male reporter, similarly successful, would hardly have attributed his S • l "l k breaks. " uccess primari y to uc Y Nor would he have been expected to do so. Nevertheless, the theme of good fortune underlying her success runs through Marguerite's work, particularly in her early work. she further described her good 60 f ortune in getting City Editor Lessing Enge l king's a ttention: Fortunately, luck prescribed that on this particular day this tall gangling city editor who hailed from Texas should be amicably disposed toward a young female job seeker who arrived unannounced and without -- as Engel drew out of me -- in fact, knowiyg a single soul in the newspaper world of New York. At the same time, in her journalism classes at Columbia, signs were emerging that she knew in a singular way what she wante d. Chamberlain, said: one of her instructors, John I was once Marguerite Higgins' teacher in a course c alled "Editorial Methods" which I gave at the Columbia School of Journalism in 1941-42. Since she knew right where she was going, I don't think I had any ef fect on he r .. Marguerite Higgins showed her ... go-for-broke style quite early. If she wanted to write 20 pages on a topic when one had only asked for 700 words, she would gladly risk getting a poor mark for ters1yess and compression just to have her complete say. It did not deter her that women we re not welcome in the newspaper business. She decided to make up for being female b y being better, an avenue many another woman journalist has taken. Being a bette r reporter often means being faster, more thorough and persistent. During the early days of her Herald Tribune career, she showed these characteristics, among others, was recognized for them, and she practiced her craft with relish. "Some of her Columbia classmates," John Chamberlain said, "thought that Maggie Higgins was arrogant." He said, "they used to quote her prediction that she would 61 some day be as well known in the newspaper world as columnist Dorothy Thompson." Chamberlain accepted her self-confidence : . this, as it turned out, was not mere bravado ; it was a statement of desire1,atched by a unique quality of iron in her will. The significant thing about Marguerite Higgins, Chamberlain said, "is that she could reach conclusions even against her own ideological preconceptions when exposure of facts dictated a change." 13 A number of Marguerite's early stories as a campus correspondent for the New York Herald Tribune provided opportunities for her to mark her mark. One example, often quoted, is the Chiang Kai-shek scoop, which represented an early triumph. In that case, Chiang Kai-shek was meeting a small group of Republican governors at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City -- some twelve in all. The press was not to be admitted. After the other reporters left the hotel, Marguerite remained, begging officials to permit one reporter. "Just me!" At t he last minute, she was permitted to stay, wrote the story for the Trib and as the only account of the meeting, garnered a "scoop" for the Trib over the other papers. 14 In the mid-Fifties, when Newsweek sought the answer to "What Makes Maggie Run?" they recalled the Chiang Kai-shek epis